Paxton vs Talarico

86,450 Views | 1022 Replies | Last: 8 min ago by Teslag
4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
murphyag said:

samurai_science said:

njohn87 said:

Let's be honest, the bloated philanderer he's running against shouldn't anyone's ideal model of masculinity either.


No one cares about the wife cheating anymore, Democrats think it's a wedge issue but it's not

True Christians should still care about wife cheating. The Ten Commandments aren't just a suggestion.

Of course they do.

Now that we've determined each of the choices we have to vote for in November are not perfect people, and both are sinners, which one represents your convictions the most?

That's the only question that needs to be asked at this point.

Unless there is a third, perfect candidate somewhere I'm unaware of?
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
murphyag said:

samurai_science said:

njohn87 said:

Let's be honest, the bloated philanderer he's running against shouldn't anyone's ideal model of masculinity either.


No one cares about the wife cheating anymore, Democrats think it's a wedge issue but it's not

True Christians should still care about wife cheating. The Ten Commandments aren't just a suggestion.

But they should ignore promotion of abortion, homosexuality, transgenderism, and distorting the words of the Bible into pretzels in order to fit his twisted political narrative?

Talarico is a flawed human being just like Paxton, and likely more so. I know that Democrats had dreams of using preacher Talarico to take the high ground and draw a moral distinction between he and Paxton, but that was an epic strategic blunder, and every time you try it will backfire big time.

As has been said, those in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who said they don't?
Kenneth_2003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Squadron7 said:

samurai_science said:

njohn87 said:

Let's be honest, the bloated philanderer he's running against shouldn't anyone's ideal model of masculinity either.


No one cares about the wife cheating anymore, Democrats think it's a wedge issue but it's not


50 years of "imbalance of power theory in workplace sexual relations" went into the bin in a nanosecond after Leader of The Free World and POTUS Bill Clinton got caught getting BJ's from a WH intern.

It was a watershed moment just like when the experts in white coats told us it was okay to gather outside during COVID as long as it was to protest the correct things.

Can't really go back from those things.


Bill Clinton?

Hell... What about FDR? Kennedy? Senator Kennedy, Edwards...
AggiePetro07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oh no said:

njohn87 said:

Let's be honest, the bloated philanderer he's running against shouldn't anyone's ideal model of masculinity either.
let's be honest, the unaccomplished fruity sacrilegious communist nut bar is running against a guy who has a track record of litigating against federal overreach and fighting for state sovereignty, border security, election integrity, and against human trafficking, over-regulation, etc.

Let's also be honest about him being acquitted in his impeachment trial.

Let's also be honest that his dating status at the end of his marriage pales in comparison to the policies of baby murdering, transing kids, open borders, DEI equity of outcomes reparations and the taxing and spending policies of the freak's party platform.
murphyag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag87H2O said:

murphyag said:

samurai_science said:

njohn87 said:

Let's be honest, the bloated philanderer he's running against shouldn't anyone's ideal model of masculinity either.


No one cares about the wife cheating anymore, Democrats think it's a wedge issue but it's not

True Christians should still care about wife cheating. The Ten Commandments aren't just a suggestion.

But they should ignore promotion of abortion, homosexuality, transgenderism, and distorting the words of the Bible into pretzels in order to fit his twisted political narrative?

Talarico is a flawed human being just like Paxton, and likely more so. I know that Democrats had dreams of using preacher Talarico to take the high ground and draw a moral distinction between he and Paxton, but that was an epic strategic blunder, and every time you try it will backfire big time.

As has been said, those in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

Who said any of that? I was replying to the guy that said that no one cares about wife cheating anymore.
Brutal Puffin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Whoop2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He without sin, throw a stone. We are ALL sinners! I'm a Christian and I will vote for a sinner but cannot even consider a false preacher! Warned about them in the Bible!
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tergdor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dude couldn't even get a real cowboy hat for the picture, had to get a gardening hat
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dem senate candidates




And they program the masses to be appalled at Paxton's failed marriage
The Ex Officio Director
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tergdor said:

Dude couldn't even get a real cowboy hat for the picture, had to get a gardening hat

Dude does like playing with hard stems.

I'll see myself out now.
There is only one constant, one universal, it is the only real truth: causality. Action. Reaction. Cause and effect.
jrdaustin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
murphyag said:

samurai_science said:

njohn87 said:

Let's be honest, the bloated philanderer he's running against shouldn't anyone's ideal model of masculinity either.


No one cares about the wife cheating anymore, Democrats think it's a wedge issue but it's not

True Christians should still care about wife cheating. The Ten Commandments aren't just a suggestion.

Yet, commandments are broken by all. I know I have broken some. And then asked for forgiveness.

That said, I DO care about wife cheating. Not a fan of it, and that's one I haven't broken. But, I have had coworkers who unfortunately have, and I have not gone on some tirade expecting them to lose their job.

I would never expect someone to be refused to be hired because of an infidelity, as I would never expect someone to lose a job simply because they are gay. Now, if their lifestyle choices inhibit their ability to DO the job, then that's another story.
J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4 said:

murphyag said:

samurai_science said:

njohn87 said:

Let's be honest, the bloated philanderer he's running against shouldn't anyone's ideal model of masculinity either.


No one cares about the wife cheating anymore, Democrats think it's a wedge issue but it's not

True Christians should still care about wife cheating. The Ten Commandments aren't just a suggestion.

Of course they do.

Now that we've determined each of the choices we have to vote for in November are not perfect people, and both are sinners, which one represents your convictions the most?

That's the only question that needs to be asked at this point.

Unless there is a third, perfect candidate somewhere I'm unaware of?


Yep. Unfortunately we're stuck with a guy who is definitely a scumbag in his personal life and who (allegedly) also has a ton of shady business deals in his past but will vote correctly, vs a fake Christian who supports abortion and kids getting sex changes, and who would vote lockstep with Schumer on everything.

Wish Conservatives could have done better but it is what it is at this point and shouldn't be a hard choice in November for basically anyone. Which is why you won't hear one of our few democrats on here even attempt to defend Talarico's insane policy positions.
Jaxson11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
J. Walter Weatherman said:

4 said:

murphyag said:

samurai_science said:

njohn87 said:

Let's be honest, the bloated philanderer he's running against shouldn't anyone's ideal model of masculinity either.


No one cares about the wife cheating anymore, Democrats think it's a wedge issue but it's not

True Christians should still care about wife cheating. The Ten Commandments aren't just a suggestion.

Of course they do.

Now that we've determined each of the choices we have to vote for in November are not perfect people, and both are sinners, which one represents your convictions the most?

That's the only question that needs to be asked at this point.

Unless there is a third, perfect candidate somewhere I'm unaware of?


Yep. Unfortunately we're stuck with a guy who is definitely a scumbag in his personal life and who (allegedly) also has a ton of shady business deals in his past but will vote correctly, vs a fake Christian who supports abortion and kids getting sex changes, and who would vote lockstep with Schumer on everything.

Wish Conservatives could have done better but it is what it is at this point and shouldn't be a hard choice in November for basically anyone. Which is why you won't hear one of our few democrats on here even attempt to defend Talarico's insane policy positions.

What does Talarico do for a living? How does he generate income?
MemphisAg1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
J. Walter Weatherman said:

4 said:

murphyag said:

samurai_science said:

njohn87 said:

Let's be honest, the bloated philanderer he's running against shouldn't anyone's ideal model of masculinity either.


No one cares about the wife cheating anymore, Democrats think it's a wedge issue but it's not

True Christians should still care about wife cheating. The Ten Commandments aren't just a suggestion.

Of course they do.

Now that we've determined each of the choices we have to vote for in November are not perfect people, and both are sinners, which one represents your convictions the most?

That's the only question that needs to be asked at this point.

Unless there is a third, perfect candidate somewhere I'm unaware of?


Yep. Unfortunately we're stuck with a guy who is definitely a scumbag in his personal life and who (allegedly) also has a ton of shady business deals in his past but will vote correctly, vs a fake Christian who supports abortion and kids getting sex changes, and who would vote lockstep with Schumer on everything.

Wish Conservatives could have done better but it is what it is at this point and shouldn't be a hard choice in November for basically anyone. Which is why you won't hear one of our few democrats on here even attempt to defend Talarico's insane policy positions.

It's really the same position I was in when Trump got the R nomination this last time around. Similar ethical issues and baggage to Paxton but still head and shoulders above Kamala. The choice was obvious and easy.

I say this not to dig at Trump or Paxton -- they are who they are -- but instead to highlight just how awful the Dem candidates are these days. Their platform is so hideous that it makes me run right toward repugnant Republican candidates I would normally reject.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
murphyag said:

Ag87H2O said:

murphyag said:

samurai_science said:

njohn87 said:

Let's be honest, the bloated philanderer he's running against shouldn't anyone's ideal model of masculinity either.


No one cares about the wife cheating anymore, Democrats think it's a wedge issue but it's not

True Christians should still care about wife cheating. The Ten Commandments aren't just a suggestion.

But they should ignore promotion of abortion, homosexuality, transgenderism, and distorting the words of the Bible into pretzels in order to fit his twisted political narrative?

Talarico is a flawed human being just like Paxton, and likely more so. I know that Democrats had dreams of using preacher Talarico to take the high ground and draw a moral distinction between he and Paxton, but that was an epic strategic blunder, and every time you try it will backfire big time.

As has been said, those in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

Who said any of that? I was replying to the guy that said that no one cares about wife cheating anymore.

I dont care, I am voting for him to destroy Democrats not teach me about morality. Also, you dont get to define what a "True Christian" is, that is one of the dumbest takes I have see on here in a while.
murphyag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jrdaustin said:

murphyag said:

samurai_science said:

njohn87 said:

Let's be honest, the bloated philanderer he's running against shouldn't anyone's ideal model of masculinity either.


No one cares about the wife cheating anymore, Democrats think it's a wedge issue but it's not

True Christians should still care about wife cheating. The Ten Commandments aren't just a suggestion.

Yet, commandments are broken by all. I know I have broken some. And then asked for forgiveness.

That said, I DO care about wife cheating. Not a fan of it, and that's one I haven't broken. But, I have had coworkers who unfortunately have, and I have not gone on some tirade expecting them to lose their job.

I would never expect someone to be refused to be hired because of an infidelity, as I would never expect someone to lose a job simply because they are gay. Now, if their lifestyle choices inhibit their ability to DO the job, then that's another story.

My grandpa and father used to always say "A father who cheats on his wife is also cheating on his children and that a man who cheats on his children won't think twice about screwing other people over in life." I swear I must have heard them saying that a thousand times when Bill Clinton was running for president the first time and throughout his presidency. And grandpa and dad weren't wrong. I'm in my 50's and over the years I have observed the same thing with guys I have worked with who were cheaters. It is a sad state of affairs that morals and decency aren't more widely valued.
murphyag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
samurai_science said:

murphyag said:

Ag87H2O said:

murphyag said:

samurai_science said:

njohn87 said:

Let's be honest, the bloated philanderer he's running against shouldn't anyone's ideal model of masculinity either.


No one cares about the wife cheating anymore, Democrats think it's a wedge issue but it's not

True Christians should still care about wife cheating. The Ten Commandments aren't just a suggestion.

But they should ignore promotion of abortion, homosexuality, transgenderism, and distorting the words of the Bible into pretzels in order to fit his twisted political narrative?

Talarico is a flawed human being just like Paxton, and likely more so. I know that Democrats had dreams of using preacher Talarico to take the high ground and draw a moral distinction between he and Paxton, but that was an epic strategic blunder, and every time you try it will backfire big time.

As has been said, those in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

Who said any of that? I was replying to the guy that said that no one cares about wife cheating anymore.

I dont care, I am voting for him to destroy Democrats not teach me about morality. Also, you dont get to define what a "True Christian" is, that is one of the dumbest takes I have see on here in a while.

I'm not defining anything. We have God, Jesus, the Bible, and the Ten Commandments to do that for us.
Old Army Ghost
How long do you want to ignore this user?
murphyag said:

jrdaustin said:

murphyag said:

samurai_science said:

njohn87 said:

Let's be honest, the bloated philanderer he's running against shouldn't anyone's ideal model of masculinity either.


No one cares about the wife cheating anymore, Democrats think it's a wedge issue but it's not

True Christians should still care about wife cheating. The Ten Commandments aren't just a suggestion.

Yet, commandments are broken by all. I know I have broken some. And then asked for forgiveness.

That said, I DO care about wife cheating. Not a fan of it, and that's one I haven't broken. But, I have had coworkers who unfortunately have, and I have not gone on some tirade expecting them to lose their job.

I would never expect someone to be refused to be hired because of an infidelity, as I would never expect someone to lose a job simply because they are gay. Now, if their lifestyle choices inhibit their ability to DO the job, then that's another story.

My grandpa and father used to always say "A father who cheats on his wife is also cheating on his children and that a man who cheats on his children won't think twice about screwing other people over in life." I swear I must have heard them saying that a thousand times when Bill Clinton was running for president the first time and throughout his presidency. And grandpa and dad weren't wrong. I'm in my 50's and over the years I have observed the same thing with guys I have worked with who were cheaters. It is a sad state of affairs that morals and decency aren't more widely valued.
facts

maga is either going to turn texas blue or elect a man that have no qualms cheating on his constituents
Old Army has gone to hell.
MemphisAg1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
murphyag said:

jrdaustin said:

murphyag said:

samurai_science said:

njohn87 said:

Let's be honest, the bloated philanderer he's running against shouldn't anyone's ideal model of masculinity either.


No one cares about the wife cheating anymore, Democrats think it's a wedge issue but it's not

True Christians should still care about wife cheating. The Ten Commandments aren't just a suggestion.

Yet, commandments are broken by all. I know I have broken some. And then asked for forgiveness.

That said, I DO care about wife cheating. Not a fan of it, and that's one I haven't broken. But, I have had coworkers who unfortunately have, and I have not gone on some tirade expecting them to lose their job.

I would never expect someone to be refused to be hired because of an infidelity, as I would never expect someone to lose a job simply because they are gay. Now, if their lifestyle choices inhibit their ability to DO the job, then that's another story.

My grandpa and father used to always say "A father who cheats on his wife is also cheating on his children and that a man who cheats on his children won't think twice about screwing other people over in life." I swear I must have heard them saying that a thousand times when Bill Clinton was running for president the first time and throughout his presidency. And grandpa and dad weren't wrong. I'm in my 50's and over the years I have observed the same thing with guys I have worked with who were cheaters. It is a sad state of affairs that morals and decency aren't more widely valued.

I agree with all of that. I wouldn't vote for Paxton in a normal world.

But when it's him and a Democrat who supports abortion, men in womens' dressing rooms, and all those other vulgarities that the Dem party promotes, then it becomes a choice of the lesser of two evils.

And in this instance, I'll vote for Paxton and move on. No way in hell I'm voting for a Democrat.
Aggie97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good news for Paxton is that his divorce trial is cancelled. Which means Mrs. Paxton is about to get paid

https://www.wfaa.com/article/news/local/texas/ken-paxton-angela-paxton-divorce-trial-canceled/287-a9eda81d-9e6d-462a-a6ad-f2661effc1f5
Scotty Appleton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
murphyag said:

samurai_science said:

murphyag said:

Ag87H2O said:

murphyag said:

samurai_science said:

njohn87 said:

Let's be honest, the bloated philanderer he's running against shouldn't anyone's ideal model of masculinity either.


No one cares about the wife cheating anymore, Democrats think it's a wedge issue but it's not

True Christians should still care about wife cheating. The Ten Commandments aren't just a suggestion.

But they should ignore promotion of abortion, homosexuality, transgenderism, and distorting the words of the Bible into pretzels in order to fit his twisted political narrative?

Talarico is a flawed human being just like Paxton, and likely more so. I know that Democrats had dreams of using preacher Talarico to take the high ground and draw a moral distinction between he and Paxton, but that was an epic strategic blunder, and every time you try it will backfire big time.

As has been said, those in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

Who said any of that? I was replying to the guy that said that no one cares about wife cheating anymore.

I dont care, I am voting for him to destroy Democrats not teach me about morality. Also, you dont get to define what a "True Christian" is, that is one of the dumbest takes I have see on here in a while.

I'm not defining anything. We have God, Jesus, the Bible, and the Ten Commandments to do that for us.


Well, I wish they would get busy doing it because the depravity and degeneration from people that believe the crap that Talarico does gets worse by the day.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
murphyag said:

Ag87H2O said:

murphyag said:

samurai_science said:

njohn87 said:

Let's be honest, the bloated philanderer he's running against shouldn't anyone's ideal model of masculinity either.


No one cares about the wife cheating anymore, Democrats think it's a wedge issue but it's not

True Christians should still care about wife cheating. The Ten Commandments aren't just a suggestion.

But they should ignore promotion of abortion, homosexuality, transgenderism, and distorting the words of the Bible into pretzels in order to fit his twisted political narrative?

Talarico is a flawed human being just like Paxton, and likely more so. I know that Democrats had dreams of using preacher Talarico to take the high ground and draw a moral distinction between he and Paxton, but that was an epic strategic blunder, and every time you try it will backfire big time.

As has been said, those in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

Who said any of that? I was replying to the guy that said that no one cares about wife cheating anymore.

He will answer for whatever sins he committed in life to an authority higher than the voters of Texas. I am not selecting a man to marry my sister, i am voting for a guy to represent Texas in Washington. And I don't give a damn what he did in his marriage when the alternative is voting for an absolute weirdo who is the antithesis of everything I stand for.
Aston 91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie97 said:

Good news for Paxton is that his divorce trial is cancelled. Which means Mrs. Paxton is about to get paid



Won't be surprised if he tries to get the taxpayers to pay this settlement, just like he did in the whistleblower suit to avoid having to go under oath and tell the truth or perjure himself.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aston 91 said:

Aggie97 said:

Good news for Paxton is that his divorce trial is cancelled. Which means Mrs. Paxton is about to get paid



Won't be surprised if he tries to get the taxpayers to pay this settlement, just like he did in the whistleblower suit to avoid having to go under oath and tell the truth or perjure himself.


Terrible troll attempt.
flyrancher
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Every vote you cast should be for the least of the evils, based only on their policy stances. Ignore what they say they will do, that is propaganda. Look at what they have actually promoted and done in their past.

If you use any other method to decide your vote, you are part of our political problem.
flyrancher
Aston 91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Call it a troll attempt if you want, but I wouldn't put anything past this guy. When given the opportunity to present his side of the story under oath, he chose not to respond and allow a default judgment that taxpayers have to pay. Also had a donor pay for a kitchen renovation and mistress. Seems within the realm of possibility that he'd somehow try to pass off some of the legal costs of his divorce to others.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Y'all had your chance to prove it and failed. Stop this.
Aston 91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The only failure was in the Senate Republicans to put principle over party. There was plenty of evidence to prove the allegations.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I was trying to give you the benefit of the doubt, my apologies.

it is nowhere in the realm of possibility that paxton would try to get taxpayers to pay the settlement. nowhere near.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oh, right. You'll prove it next time. Still waiting.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aston 91 said:

Aggie97 said:

Good news for Paxton is that his divorce trial is cancelled. Which means Mrs. Paxton is about to get paid



Won't be surprised if he tries to get the taxpayers to pay this settlement, just like he did in the whistleblower suit to avoid having to go under oath and tell the truth or perjure himself.

Would you say that we should hold all officeholders that use taxpayer money for settlements to account? Should they all be barred from public service?
Line Ate Member
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flyrancher said:

Every vote you cast should be for the least of the evils, based only on their policy stances. Ignore what they say they will do, that is propaganda. Look at what they have actually promoted and done in their past.

If you use any other method to decide your vote, you are part of our political problem.
This. Slow societal decay so our children and grandchildren may not have to deal with all of the bullcrap we are seeing now
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aston 91 said:

The only failure was in the Senate Republicans to put principle over party. There was plenty of evidence to prove the allegations.

Can you think of any other examples of a legislative body failing to put principals over party with relation to legal settlements? Why should Paxton, alone, be held accountable for such things?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.