Paxton vs Talarico

84,493 Views | 1008 Replies | Last: 7 min ago by Sweep4-2
Tergdor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The democrats who claim to care about the mental wellbeing of children wanted to force a child to testify against his will after a 7-5 hung jury in the first trial. His testimony is essential to the case (long term abuse). That's what you're missing.

People can criticize the plea deal all they want but when the defense knows that the key witness is not willing to testify they have a ton of leverage in negotiations.

Prosecutors having to take lesser plea deals due to witnesses not cooperating is pretty common. If this is the albatross Talarico is going to try to hang his hat on he's going to fail.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
annie88 said:

SigAg6 said:

bobbranco said:

SigAg6 said:

bobbranco said:

SigAg6 said:

bobbranco said:

SigAg6 said:

Logos Stick said:

SigAg6 said:

bobbranco said:

SigAg6 said:

Hullabaloonatic said:

To be fair, Talarico is also not a criminal or adulterer so he's got that going for him (to those who still care about moral character, which I know is not most of MAGA).

but but but policy

Are you wanting the full gamut of Democrat Socialist absurd policies?

Open borders?
Anti-semitism?
Force children to transition?
Let Johnny play dress up?
Teach children in detail about the 60 genders?


Those are not policies


Yes they are. Your party is the party of murder and depravity.

What do you think my party is? Why are you addressing me specifically?


It's a discussion forum.

We are here to discuss posts made and ask questions about posts made.

that was an insult, not a discussion

Are you voting for Talarico?

If so why?

Legalization of weed. Paxton wants a nanny state.


mmmkay. One of those guys.

Yeah, nice discussion.


So just because of ****ing pot, you're gonna vote for a weirdo ass, lying piece of crap who would do everything he can to destroy Texas.

How can drugs be this important to your life?


But seriously, weed is totally not addictive!
jrdaustin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

Cornyn being friends with them pales in comparison to how much they hate Trump.!

Which senator was going to change their mind because of Cornyn's friendship?


As I said, above, regardless of eventual outcome, he should have done all he could to push for it. He chose not to.



If Cornyn had ever thought himself capable of being Majority Leader, my expectation was for him to change McConnell's mind, and be public about it.

Cornyn wasn't just Mitch's friend. He was his loyal lieutenant and whip. So now as McConnell rides into the sunset burning bridges as he goes, Cornyn should have whipped McConnell, saying "I've had your back for all these years, and now it's time you have mine."

First privately, then publicly.

THAT was my expectation from Cornyn. And Paxton actually teed up the ball for him.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tergdor said:

The democrats who claim to care about the mental wellbeing of children wanted to force a child to testify against his will after a 7-5 hung jury in the first trial. His testimony is essential to the case (long term abuse). That's what you're missing.

People can criticize the plea deal all they want but when the defense knows that the key witness is not willing to testify they have a ton of leverage in negotiations.

Prosecutors having to take lesser plea deals due to witnesses not cooperating is pretty common. If this is the albatross Talarico is going to try to hang his hat on he's going to fail.

It's all they really have.

Anything else about Paxton is old news, so the standard fallback the Democrats now use against Republicans is to scream "pedophile!" and "Epstein!"
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dan Carlin said:

Rapier108 said:

Dan Carlin said:

AozorAg said:

Dan Carlin said:

dmz233 said:

Tone2002 said:

Ag87H2O said:

Jesse Woods said:

Who do I vote for if my single issue is less corruption? Explain to me like I'm a 5 year old.






I was going to say he is a known Adulterer so that whole
Christian conservative goes out of the window.


And Talarico supports trans children, so that throws all of Christianity out the window for him.


Absolutely, cuz Jesus was like "let all the children come to me... except those ones"

There is no such thing as trans children. Nice straw man. Good lord.


When do trans people become trans people?

No such thing as "trans." They are mentally ill and need help, both psychologically and spiritually, the latter not by someone like Talarico.


The medical and scientific community disagrees with you, but since that clearly doesn't matter to you perhaps we should consult the flying spaghetti monster.



Ok, well, from the beginning of time until 4 years ago, the scientific and medical community believed that trans-whatever was mental illness. There is a huge portion of that community that still believes that. The other part succumbed to the woke mind virus when we had this social contagion of trans degeneracy. You choose to believe that side because of the mind virus.

The cure is to work on the mind of the sick individuals to line their mind up with their true gender and sex, not hack off their body parts and fill them full of drugs.
Bull Meachem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bobbranco said:

There it is 'Epstein class'.

The MAP loving party's feeble moniker.


It's about a guy sentenced 25 to life only serving a month and then not having to register as a sex offender in Texas. It sounds too outrageous to be true, which is why I asked.

And MAGA created this Epstein bull**** themselves and it got out of their control.
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bull Meachem said:

Please tell me what I'm missing here.



Adam Hoffman was charged with continuous sexual abuse of a young child, which is a Class A Felony, and carries aa 25 year to life sentence. The AG's office was handling the case because the local DA's office had recused themselves (rightfully so, as Hoffman was a local attorney who had dealings with the local DA). At trial, the jury hung 7-5 in favor of a finding of guilty. There were some inconsistencies in the child's testimony, and allegations that Waco PD had botched the investigation at the outset. The AG's office offered a deal of two counts that were Class A Misdemeanors, which would have a sentencing maximum of 1 year, but offered a sentence of time served (I believe he had spent 1 day in jail at the time). They supposedly offered the deal because the child was unwilling to testify at the second trial (this fact is somewhat in dispute). Hoffman took the deal, and when it came to sentencing, the judge was rightfully pissed and increased the sentence to 60 days, the most the judge could do. Hoffman was released from jail this week after serving 29 days.

If the whole thing seems a little gross to you, you're not alone.
Bull Meachem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thank you.

I believe it to be lying but what does Talarico mean when he says that he was supposed to serve 25 to life.
TommyBrady
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
IDGAF About Paxton's baggage if its a vote between someone who will actually vote for conservative issues versus voting for that demonic little ***** who will try to further his evil views then voting for Paxton is easy.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If the same case had been handled by the DA in Travis, Dallas, Harris, or Bexar County, and the outcome was the same; the people clutching pearls right now and yelling about Epstein, would be praising the DA for not forcing a child victim to go through another trial after he refused to do so.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Gigem314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jrdaustin said:

amercer said:

They believe that eggs (and probably gas) shouldn't be so expensive

Bullcrap!

Gas was double what it is today during the Biden administration, and loyal Dems didn't seem to care.

They were blaming Republicans for it back then too. It's all they know how to do.

They don't give a damn about helping anyone in this country that makes a living for themself.
Bull Meachem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TommyBrady said:

IDGAF About Paxton's baggage if its a vote between someone who will actually vote for conservative issues versus voting for that demonic little ***** who will try to further his evil views then voting for Paxton is easy.


Can't we hold our people accountable and still not vote for the other guy? Imagine what sort of government we would get if we did that.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bull Meachem said:

TommyBrady said:

IDGAF About Paxton's baggage if its a vote between someone who will actually vote for conservative issues versus voting for that demonic little ***** who will try to further his evil views then voting for Paxton is easy.


Can't we hold our people accountable and still not vote for the other guy? Imagine what sort of government we would get if we did that.

You can do what you want, I will vote R. You are using your imagination on how you want the world to be instead of dealing with how things actually are.

samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TommyBrady said:

IDGAF About Paxton's baggage if its a vote between someone who will actually vote for conservative issues versus voting for that demonic little ***** who will try to further his evil views then voting for Paxton is easy.

This is all that matters.
TyHolden
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Let's see what he eats today...

I hope I did not offend anybody with this post. If I did, please come see me at my address in my profile so we can talk.
TommyBrady
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bull Meachem said:

TommyBrady said:

IDGAF About Paxton's baggage if its a vote between someone who will actually vote for conservative issues versus voting for that demonic little ***** who will try to further his evil views then voting for Paxton is easy.


Can't we hold our people accountable and still not vote for the other guy? Imagine what sort of government we would get if we did that.

He won the primary it wasn't like he was anointed. The primary was that chance and instead the voters decided that Cornyn needed to be held accountable. In 6 years the voters will decide again.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J. Walter Weatherman said:

Dan Carlin said:

Rapier108 said:

Dan Carlin said:

AozorAg said:

Dan Carlin said:

dmz233 said:

Tone2002 said:

Ag87H2O said:

Jesse Woods said:

Who do I vote for if my single issue is less corruption? Explain to me like I'm a 5 year old.






I was going to say he is a known Adulterer so that whole
Christian conservative goes out of the window.


And Talarico supports trans children, so that throws all of Christianity out the window for him.


Absolutely, cuz Jesus was like "let all the children come to me... except those ones"

There is no such thing as trans children. Nice straw man. Good lord.


When do trans people become trans people?

No such thing as "trans." They are mentally ill and need help, both psychologically and spiritually, the latter not by someone like Talarico.


The medical and scientific community disagrees with you, but since that clearly doesn't matter to you perhaps we should consult the flying spaghetti monster.


The "medical and scientific community", along with all liberals, lost all credibility when they wanted to shut the entire world down for a bad flu.

Correct. Plenty of medical and scientific community all over the world recommend treating it as mental health issue.
David_Puddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dan Carlin said:

David_Puddy said:

Dan Carlin said:

David_Puddy said:

Jesse Woods said:

Who do I vote for if my single issue is less corruption? Explain to me like I'm a 5 year old.


Depends on whether you consider slandering The Bible as corruption I guess.


You just went full theocracy. Never go full theocracy.


He asked a question and I answered it. Do you think that preaching falsities about The Bible is more or less corrupt than cheating on your spouse? Because they're both a sin last time I checked. Of you want to split religion and politics fine, then my answer will always be policies. I think we all know what policies that Talafreako would try and push forward…..no thanks


I think "falsities about the bible" is your own religious belief, as is whatever you define "sin". Corruption is a pretty straightforward definition however that doesn't require intervention by invisible sky fairies.


What planet are you posting from? If you don't believe in Christianity, then I'm done conversing with you.

Spreading lies about The Bible is cut and dry and is what Talarico is doing. In no version of The Bible does it say that there are 6 genders. It clearly says that there are 2. In no version of The Bible does it glorify abortion. In no version of The Bible does it discuss it being ok to change the biological gender that God himself created you as in his own image. If you disagree, then you can go ahead and point me to the chapter and verse IN ANY VERSION of The Bible where it says any of this nonsense this lunatic Talarico is spreading.

Corruption is defined as "the abuse of entrusted power or authority for private or personal gain. It encompasses dishonest, unethical, or illegal behaviors." By the very definition, Talarico is corrupt. I'm really not sure how to make it any more cut and dry for you, bub.

Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wasn't it the medical and scientific community that said told us it was deadly to go out of doors for any reason during COVID…except to protest and loot?
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bull Meachem said:

Thank you.

I believe it to be lying but what does Talarico mean when he says that he was supposed to serve 25 to life.

The first trial was for a Class A Felony that carried a 25 to life sentence. The jury hung 7-5 in favor of guilty. But he was never sentenced. IMHO, I think the AG's office didn't handle the case well, but I also think they were hamstrung a little by a sloppy Waco PD investigation.
David_Puddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And Dan, it seems like you don't believe in Jesus (I'll pray that you come to the light one day), and in that case, why would you vote for someone who goes against your beliefs? Do you believe that there are 6 genders? I'm genuinely confused as to why you'd be advocating and voting for a "pastor" who goes against your fundamental beliefs in the first place. Doesn't make a lick of sense.
AlexNguyen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bull Meachem said:

TommyBrady said:

IDGAF About Paxton's baggage if its a vote between someone who will actually vote for conservative issues versus voting for that demonic little ***** who will try to further his evil views then voting for Paxton is easy.


Can't we hold our people accountable and still not vote for the other guy? Imagine what sort of government we would get if we did that.

It's a binary choice in November for the pragmatic. Ideals mean nothing if your vote or lack thereof means Chuck Schumer or Hakeem Jefferies becomes the majority leaders in their chambers.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:

Dan Carlin said:


The medical and scientific community disagrees with you, but since that clearly doesn't matter to you perhaps we should consult the flying spaghetti monster.
The opinions of leftist hacks are not medical science. But you probably didn't know that.

Deep down in their subconscious somewhere they know what the truth is but their dem overlords have done such a complete job of brainwashing them, they can't consciously admit to the truth. It's sad but there's lots of them out there and they vote.
Dan Carlin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
David_Puddy said:

And Dan, it seems like you don't believe in Jesus (I'll pray that you come to the light one day), and in that case, why would you vote for someone who goes against your beliefs? Do you believe that there are 6 genders? I'm genuinely confused as to why you'd be advocating and voting for a "pastor" who goes against your fundamental beliefs in the first place. Doesn't make a lick of sense.


I also fundamentally don't support corruption, cheating on your spouse, and giving sweetheart deals to pedophile buddies. There is no way to find a candidate you are truly 100% in agreement with unless you're looking in the mirror. So give your vote to the one that is best aligned to the direction you want things to go.

Me, I'm ready to push out the cult of Trump and all its acolytes.
Iraq2xVeteran
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I hope Ken Paxton exposes James Talarico's numerous ridiculous tweets and actions in advertisements and paint his association with former President Obama as too liberal for Texas. I think Paxton will win by 3-5% to keep this Senate seat red.
Dan Carlin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
David_Puddy said:

Dan Carlin said:

David_Puddy said:

Dan Carlin said:

David_Puddy said:

Jesse Woods said:

Who do I vote for if my single issue is less corruption? Explain to me like I'm a 5 year old.


Depends on whether you consider slandering The Bible as corruption I guess.


You just went full theocracy. Never go full theocracy.


He asked a question and I answered it. Do you think that preaching falsities about The Bible is more or less corrupt than cheating on your spouse? Because they're both a sin last time I checked. Of you want to split religion and politics fine, then my answer will always be policies. I think we all know what policies that Talafreako would try and push forward…..no thanks


I think "falsities about the bible" is your own religious belief, as is whatever you define "sin". Corruption is a pretty straightforward definition however that doesn't require intervention by invisible sky fairies.


What planet are you posting from? If you don't believe in Christianity, then I'm done conversing with you.

Spreading lies about The Bible is cut and dry and is what Talarico is doing. In no version of The Bible does it say that there are 6 genders. It clearly says that there are 2. In no version of The Bible does it glorify abortion. In no version of The Bible does it discuss it being ok to change the biological gender that God himself created you as in his own image. If you disagree, then you can go ahead and point me to the chapter and verse IN ANY VERSION of The Bible where it says any of this nonsense this lunatic Talarico is spreading.

Corruption is defined as "the abuse of entrusted power or authority for private or personal gain. It encompasses dishonest, unethical, or illegal behaviors." By the very definition, Talarico is corrupt. I'm really not sure how to make it any more cut and dry for you, bub.




To summarize, disagreeing with what your fundie church says about its sky fairie = corruption, but outright bribery is not. Cool.

Blessed be the fruit!
rgag12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Who holds a napkin to eat a rib??
rednecked
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Prosperdick said:



bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bull Meachem said:

bobbranco said:

There it is 'Epstein class'.

The MAP loving party's feeble moniker.


It's about a guy sentenced 25 to life only serving a month and then not having to register as a sex offender in Texas. It sounds too outrageous to be true, which is why I asked.

And MAGA created this Epstein bull**** themselves and it got out of their control.


Epstein and Maxwell were perverts. Their sex parties were well known. The entire political establishment dropped the ball. The first tainted was Clinton. But keep pushing the demonic narrative from the MAP enabling party.
Bull Meachem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TommyBrady said:

Bull Meachem said:

TommyBrady said:

IDGAF About Paxton's baggage if its a vote between someone who will actually vote for conservative issues versus voting for that demonic little ***** who will try to further his evil views then voting for Paxton is easy.


Can't we hold our people accountable and still not vote for the other guy? Imagine what sort of government we would get if we did that.

He won the primary it wasn't like he was anointed. The primary was that chance and instead the voters decided that Cornyn needed to be held accountable. In 6 years the voters will decide again.


Voting isn't the only way to hold him accountable. Imagine if we protested and let our voices be heard, no matter who is in office. Unfortunately, we just revert to "He was better than the other choice." or pull a MAGA/ Dems and completely change their opinions based on what their dear leader says.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bull Meachem said:

Thank you.

I believe it to be lying but what does Talarico mean when he says that he was supposed to serve 25 to life.

Rigby and Talarico should spend 25 to life for the child abuse in their cult.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
David_Puddy said:


Corruption is defined as "the abuse of entrusted power or authority for private or personal gain. It encompasses dishonest, unethical, or illegal behaviors." By the very definition, Talarico is corrupt. I'm really not sure how to make it any more cut and dry for you, bub.



bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rockdoc said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

Dan Carlin said:


The medical and scientific community disagrees with you, but since that clearly doesn't matter to you perhaps we should consult the flying spaghetti monster.

The opinions of leftist hacks are not medical science. But you probably didn't know that.

Deep down in their subconscious somewhere they know what the truth is but their dem overlords have done such a complete job of brainwashing them, they can't consciously admit to the truth. It's sad but there's lots of them out there and they vote.


Don't forget about the age old case of male feminists created while under the spell of the v.
Cinco Ranch Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Me, I'm ready to push out the cult of Trump and all its acolytes.

Likewise, I'm ready to see the end of communism, socialism, and the Democrat Party as the proven failures that they are.
Gaeilge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Betting markets not giving much confidence to Talarico. Paxton has picked up 5pts in 36hrs
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.