Paxton vs Talarico

81,965 Views | 988 Replies | Last: 5 min ago by japantiger
aggietony2010
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logos Stick said:

Hullabaloonatic said:

To be fair, Talarico is also not a criminal or adulterer so he's got that going for him (to those who still care about moral character, which I know is not most of MAGA).



He's worse than that. He's a pervert and demonic.

You libs dgas about moral character. Monica's blue dress says HI. Biden raped a staffer and committed other gross acts with kids. LMFAO!


All else equal, I'll take someone who falls into natural vices over the unnatural any day of the week.
dmz233
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Killer_21 said:

AgBQ-00 said:



When the choice is maybe impropriety vs a literal Marxist globalist intent on destroying America. Yeah I'm going with the one who has done a great job as AG and supports the positions I support...

You support freeing child rapists?


When did Talerico free child rapists? I'm sure he supports them with his perversion.
Post removed:
by user
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gaeilge said:



Lol - "Too Low-T for Texas"
Gaeilge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SigAg6 said:

bobbranco said:

SigAg6 said:

bobbranco said:

SigAg6 said:

Logos Stick said:

SigAg6 said:

bobbranco said:

SigAg6 said:

Hullabaloonatic said:

To be fair, Talarico is also not a criminal or adulterer so he's got that going for him (to those who still care about moral character, which I know is not most of MAGA).

but but but policy

Are you wanting the full gamut of Democrat Socialist absurd policies?

Open borders?
Anti-semitism?
Force children to transition?
Let Johnny play dress up?
Teach children in detail about the 60 genders?


Those are not policies


Yes they are. Your party is the party of murder and depravity.

What do you think my party is? Why are you addressing me specifically?


It's a discussion forum.

We are here to discuss posts made and ask questions about posts made.

that was an insult, not a discussion

Are you voting for Talarico?

If so why?
Legalization of weed. Paxton wants a nanny state.


False. Dan Patrick wants a nanny state. It's Paxton's job, which he did, to carry out the enforcement of it.

An AG carrying out his duties!! OH NO!!

Next false statement?

I say this as one of the more vocal supporters of legalization on this board. But blaming Paxton ain't it.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SigAg6 said:

bobbranco said:

SigAg6 said:

bobbranco said:

SigAg6 said:

Logos Stick said:

SigAg6 said:

bobbranco said:

SigAg6 said:

Hullabaloonatic said:

To be fair, Talarico is also not a criminal or adulterer so he's got that going for him (to those who still care about moral character, which I know is not most of MAGA).

but but but policy

Are you wanting the full gamut of Democrat Socialist absurd policies?

Open borders?
Anti-semitism?
Force children to transition?
Let Johnny play dress up?
Teach children in detail about the 60 genders?


Those are not policies


Yes they are. Your party is the party of murder and depravity.

What do you think my party is? Why are you addressing me specifically?


It's a discussion forum.

We are here to discuss posts made and ask questions about posts made.

that was an insult, not a discussion

Are you voting for Talarico?

If so why?

Legalization of weed. Paxton wants a nanny state.


mmmkay. One of those guys.
Post removed:
by user
Gaeilge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Look above his post for your discussion
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SigAg6 said:

bobbranco said:

SigAg6 said:

bobbranco said:

SigAg6 said:

bobbranco said:

SigAg6 said:

Logos Stick said:

SigAg6 said:

bobbranco said:

SigAg6 said:

Hullabaloonatic said:

To be fair, Talarico is also not a criminal or adulterer so he's got that going for him (to those who still care about moral character, which I know is not most of MAGA).

but but but policy

Are you wanting the full gamut of Democrat Socialist absurd policies?

Open borders?
Anti-semitism?
Force children to transition?
Let Johnny play dress up?
Teach children in detail about the 60 genders?


Those are not policies


Yes they are. Your party is the party of murder and depravity.

What do you think my party is? Why are you addressing me specifically?


It's a discussion forum.

We are here to discuss posts made and ask questions about posts made.

that was an insult, not a discussion

Are you voting for Talarico?

If so why?

Legalization of weed. Paxton wants a nanny state.


mmmkay. One of those guys.

Yeah, nice discussion.


What is there to discuss with you other than bud?
4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SigAg6 said:

bobbranco said:

SigAg6 said:

bobbranco said:

SigAg6 said:

Logos Stick said:

SigAg6 said:

bobbranco said:

SigAg6 said:

Hullabaloonatic said:

To be fair, Talarico is also not a criminal or adulterer so he's got that going for him (to those who still care about moral character, which I know is not most of MAGA).

but but but policy

Are you wanting the full gamut of Democrat Socialist absurd policies?

Open borders?
Anti-semitism?
Force children to transition?
Let Johnny play dress up?
Teach children in detail about the 60 genders?


Those are not policies


Yes they are. Your party is the party of murder and depravity.

What do you think my party is? Why are you addressing me specifically?


It's a discussion forum.

We are here to discuss posts made and ask questions about posts made.

that was an insult, not a discussion

Are you voting for Talarico?

If so why?
Legalization of weed. Paxton wants a nanny state. He and Dan "Granny" Patrick need to go.

You can always rely on potheads to consider the big picture
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And the goober incel charlatan will get to fight the below until election day.

4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Martin Q. Blank said:



agent-maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So on the down low-T is for legalizing weed? Hadn't heard that before. Just another Christian value, right?
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's not going to be close. It will be 10-15, imho. I was hoping the Dems would invest/burn some significant soft money ($15-20 million) in the scam artist but I am not seeing that happening at this point. They are going to focus on Maine/Michigan/Georgia/NH and elsewhere, imho.
Gaeilge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4 said:

SigAg6 said:

bobbranco said:

SigAg6 said:

bobbranco said:

SigAg6 said:

Logos Stick said:

SigAg6 said:

bobbranco said:

SigAg6 said:

Hullabaloonatic said:

To be fair, Talarico is also not a criminal or adulterer so he's got that going for him (to those who still care about moral character, which I know is not most of MAGA).

but but but policy

Are you wanting the full gamut of Democrat Socialist absurd policies?

Open borders?
Anti-semitism?
Force children to transition?
Let Johnny play dress up?
Teach children in detail about the 60 genders?


Those are not policies


Yes they are. Your party is the party of murder and depravity.

What do you think my party is? Why are you addressing me specifically?


It's a discussion forum.

We are here to discuss posts made and ask questions about posts made.

that was an insult, not a discussion

Are you voting for Talarico?

If so why?
Legalization of weed. Paxton wants a nanny state. He and Dan "Granny" Patrick need to go.

You can always rely on potheads to consider the big picture


This…I'm a huge proponent of legalization! But trying to declare Paxton as a key hold up in it is nonsensical! He has a duty to sue the **** out of cities/municipalities that try to skirt state law. It is imperative for maintaining state sovereignty over the municipalities! It cannot be that local governments have the ability to override state law!
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DG-Ag said:

He reminds me of "Damien" from "The Omen." Only creepier.

Issac from Children of the Corn
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Texas Tribune out with the first hit piece on Paxton.

https://www.texastribune.org/2026/05/19/ken-paxton-waco-plea-deal-child-sex-abuse-texas-attorney-general/
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Killer_21
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://dailycallernewsfoundation.org/2026/05/26/pedophile-goes-free-early-after-texas-ags-plea-deal-prosecutors-say-their-hands-were-tied/


nah it's paxton who supports and frees them
Post removed:
by user
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Does a senator set the state's policy on marijuana?
Gaeilge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He's never taken a public position on it because his duty has been to enforce the law of the state!

Your faux outrage over the matter hasn't even been addressed by him.
Post removed:
by user
hunter2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Post removed:
by user
Gaeilge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SigAg6 said:

He didn't have to sue Dallas.


Yes he did!! What don't you understand about the state, TEXAS, needing to sue the city when they tried to subvert STATE LAW!!

You are either ignorant or intentionally obtuse on the duties of the State AG! It was his job to sue Dallas!
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What is wrong with this fru fru moron?
I don’t get enough credit for the things I manage not to say.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I didn't think Grapesoda was this desperate.
Post removed:
by user
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You clearly didn't read the article.

And, unfortunately, that jury could not reach a unanimous verdict, resulting in a hung jury by a vote of seven to five, with seven voting to convict."

"Nonetheless, our office was prepared to re-try the case and seek a conviction. However, following his experience in the first trial, the child made clear that he would not voluntarily testify at a second trial … the child emphasized that he preferred to move on with his life and prioritize his mental and emotional health over subjection to the unimaginably difficult position of once again testifying against the man who abused him,"
I don’t get enough credit for the things I manage not to say.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He legitimately looks terrified or scared standing in front of that flag.
I don’t get enough credit for the things I manage not to say.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
annie88 said:

You clearly didn't read the article.




They never do. But will look the other way when their church cult actively grooms and abuses children.
Gaeilge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So you're obtuse. Got it!

The city cannot usurp state law. You're mad about the position. I get it. I'm not a fan of it either. But Paxton did exactly what he was elected to do and what his duties as State AG required him to do. His job is to enforce the law as AG, not to make the law.

Your argument is nonsensical and you're wrapped up in your personal feels on the matter.

He did his job that he was elected to do. That's why he's getting my vote and many others on November.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SigAg6 said:

bobbranco said:

SigAg6 said:

bobbranco said:

SigAg6 said:

bobbranco said:

SigAg6 said:

Logos Stick said:

SigAg6 said:

bobbranco said:

SigAg6 said:

Hullabaloonatic said:

To be fair, Talarico is also not a criminal or adulterer so he's got that going for him (to those who still care about moral character, which I know is not most of MAGA).

but but but policy

Are you wanting the full gamut of Democrat Socialist absurd policies?

Open borders?
Anti-semitism?
Force children to transition?
Let Johnny play dress up?
Teach children in detail about the 60 genders?


Those are not policies


Yes they are. Your party is the party of murder and depravity.

What do you think my party is? Why are you addressing me specifically?


It's a discussion forum.

We are here to discuss posts made and ask questions about posts made.

that was an insult, not a discussion

Are you voting for Talarico?

If so why?

Legalization of weed. Paxton wants a nanny state.


mmmkay. One of those guys.
Yeah, nice discussion.


So just because of ****ing pot, you're gonna vote for a weirdo ass, lying piece of crap who would do everything he can to destroy Texas.

How can drugs be this important to your life?
I don’t get enough credit for the things I manage not to say.
Killer_21
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
annie88 said:

You clearly didn't read the article.

And, unfortunately, that jury could not reach a unanimous verdict, resulting in a hung jury by a vote of seven to five, with seven voting to convict."

"Nonetheless, our office was prepared to re-try the case and seek a conviction. However, following his experience in the first trial, the child made clear that he would not voluntarily testify at a second trial … the child emphasized that he preferred to move on with his life and prioritize his mental and emotional health over subjection to the unimaginably difficult position of once again testifying against the man who abused him,"

Soooo it's a good thing the self admitted pedophile was released because of a hung jury? That's your argument?

"Hoffman pleaded guilty in April to indecent assault and displaying harmful materials to a minor for sexually abusing his son's close friend repeatedly over a three-year period"
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Killer_21 said:

annie88 said:

You clearly didn't read the article.

And, unfortunately, that jury could not reach a unanimous verdict, resulting in a hung jury by a vote of seven to five, with seven voting to convict."

"Nonetheless, our office was prepared to re-try the case and seek a conviction. However, following his experience in the first trial, the child made clear that he would not voluntarily testify at a second trial … the child emphasized that he preferred to move on with his life and prioritize his mental and emotional health over subjection to the unimaginably difficult position of once again testifying against the man who abused him,"

Soooo it's a good thing the self admitted pedophile was released because of a hung jury? That's your argument?

"Hoffman pleaded guilty in April to indecent assault and displaying harmful materials to a minor for sexually abusing his son's close friend repeatedly over a three-year period"


Nobody is jumping for joy about this other than you and those not voting for Paxton.

I don't know of any poster that wants this child rapist free. I would prefer he be slit open, bound and dropped in a hog farm.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.