obama judge micro manages trump to return illegal abrego garcia

89,459 Views | 1075 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by will25u
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gradin said:

Semantics. "facilitate" his return
Not "effectuate". SCOTUS made it clear what they did and did not mean. Its not "semantics" in a legal ruling. Stop watching MSNBC. In no case is he ever coming back to the US
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Matt Hooper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And as had been pointed out repeatedly not only the Scotus NOT say the Illegal Alien must be brought back, SCOTUS specifically told the lower court to stay out of the executive branch's article II lane.


Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gradin said:

Semantics. "facilitate" his return
Words have meaning. You are intentionally misleading with your posts.

The President has no power to compel a sovereign foreign nation to turn over one of its citizens, a terrorist no less, to the United States. It is sheer lunacy that anyone would advocate for such a thing.
Gradin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I actually don't really watch MSNBC. I read news articles and legal experts thoughts.

Not sure why many of you are so offended by letting him get due process which is a right in the Constitution for even non citizens. I know conservatives want to argue he doesn't deserve it but that is their feelings. Even the Supreme Court said is allowed due process. I'm literally reading the ruling right now.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gradin said:

I actually don't really watch MSNBC. I read news articles and legal experts thoughts.

Not sure why many of you are so offended by letting him get due process which is a right in the Constitution for even non citizens.
Define what due process rights the Constitution gives non-citizens.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gradin said:

I actually don't really watch MSNBC. I read news articles and legal experts thoughts.

Not sure why many of you are so offended by letting him get due process which is a right in the Constitution for even non citizens. I know conservatives want to argue he doesn't deserve it but that is their feelings. Even the Supreme Court said is allowed due process. I'm literally reading the ruling right now.
He had his due process. He was ruled deportable in court. Again, educate yourself on the facts
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Quote:

Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin revealed on Wednesday that deported illegal alien and alleged MS-13 gang member Kilmar Abrego Garcia was with two other MS-13 members when he was arrested in 2019, and was found to have "rolls of cash and drugs" on him. Garcia crossed the border into the United States illegally in 2012 and when he was arrested in 2019, claimed he had to flee El Salvador as a teenager to escape gang violence.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just trolling. Nothing more.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
captkirk said:

Gradin said:

I actually don't really watch MSNBC. I read news articles and legal experts thoughts.

Not sure why many of you are so offended by letting him get due process which is a right in the Constitution for even non citizens. I know conservatives want to argue he doesn't deserve it but that is their feelings. Even the Supreme Court said is allowed due process. I'm literally reading the ruling right now.
He had his due process. He was ruled deportable in court. Again, educate yourself on the facts
Exactly
Gradin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:

Gradin said:

Semantics. "facilitate" his return
Words have meaning. You are intentionally misleading with your posts.

The President has no power to compel a sovereign foreign nation to turn over one of its citizens, a terrorist no less, to the United States. It is sheer lunacy that anyone would advocate for such a thing.


He did this before his due process though. It's super obvious that they took him away as quickly as possible which even the government admitted they did it in error initially. And El Salvador has already returned people back to the US so it's BS that they don't have the power to do it now.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gradin said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

Gradin said:

Semantics. "facilitate" his return
Words have meaning. You are intentionally misleading with your posts.

The President has no power to compel a sovereign foreign nation to turn over one of its citizens, a terrorist no less, to the United States. It is sheer lunacy that anyone would advocate for such a thing.


He did this before his due process though.
False. Can you argue in good faith?
Gradin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:

Gradin said:

I actually don't really watch MSNBC. I read news articles and legal experts thoughts.

Not sure why many of you are so offended by letting him get due process which is a right in the Constitution for even non citizens.
Define what due process rights the Constitution gives non-citizens.


Literally the 5th amendment
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gradin said:

I actually don't really watch MSNBC. I read news articles and legal experts thoughts.

Not sure why many of you are so offended by letting him get due process which is a right in the Constitution for even non citizens. I know conservatives want to argue he doesn't deserve it but that is their feelings. Even the Supreme Court said is allowed due process. I'm literally reading the ruling right now.



No one is doubting that you can read, however reading and comprehension are not one and the same.
"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gradin said:

I actually don't really watch MSNBC. I read news articles and legal experts thoughts.

Not sure why many of you are so offended by letting him get due process which is a right in the Constitution for even non citizens. I know conservatives want to argue he doesn't deserve it but that is their feelings. Even the Supreme Court said is allowed due process. I'm literally reading the ruling right now.
Ah yes, the "experts", like the covid "experts" and russian collusion "experts". Lots of "experts" around
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gradin said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

Gradin said:

I actually don't really watch MSNBC. I read news articles and legal experts thoughts.

Not sure why many of you are so offended by letting him get due process which is a right in the Constitution for even non citizens.
Define what due process rights the Constitution gives non-citizens.


Literally the 5th amendment
He had his day in court, you are way behind
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nope.

Are you insinuating that every illegal alien should go through the grand jury process and a full trial? Why have we never done that before you started defending international terrorists?
Gradin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-administration-lies-kilmar-abrego-garcia-explained-1235318906/

I see why other non-conservatives barely post here. I know that y'all see that as a compliment but I've had PMs with other non-conservatives warning me to stop posting here because it's pointless.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gradin said:

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-administration-lies-kilmar-abrego-garcia-explained-1235318906/
Rollingstone, you just played yourself, take the L.



Rolling Fing Stone, JFC, troll alert
Slicer97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Who the hell takes Rolling Stone seriously as a news source for anything other than the entertainment industry?
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gradin said:

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-administration-lies-kilmar-abrego-garcia-explained-1235318906/


You're using rolling stone as a source?

Question ... why do you really think Democrats are so interested in this? They actually seem much more concerned about this than iillegal immigrants who kill US citizens.

Why do they care so much about this guy?
Slicer97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gradin said:

I see why other non-conservatives barely post here. I know that y'all see that as a compliment but I've had PMs with other non-conservatives warning me to stop posting here because it's pointless.
It's because y'alls arguments rarely have merit.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Quote:


It's because y'alls arguments rarely have merit.
That's how it is for people who stand up for illegal aliens who terrorize Americans. There is no logical argument. They have to resort to lies.
Slicer97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yep.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pretty good break down on why the judges have downplayed Garcia's MS13 ties. Which I might add is a big reason why most MSM and Democrats are dying on this 90-10 hill.

But most people just hear what the MSM says and run with it.

Garcia is a MS13 TERRORIST and should be treated as such.

Would ask everyone contributing to this thread to read and understand this thread.



"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
2000AgPhD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Due process for an illegal works like this:

1. You establish the identity of the individual.
2. You determine that the individual is in the country illegally.
3. At that point, having violated the laws of the country, he is eligible for deportation

Literally and legally, that is it - and it has already happened in this guy's case. The government and the executive branch owe him nothing more than that, and had every right to deport him.
Get Off My Lawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2000AgPhD said:

Due process for an illegal works like this:

1. You establish the identity of the individual.
2. You determine that the individual is in the country illegally.
3. At that point, having violated the laws of the country, he is eligible for deportation

Literally and legally, that is it - and it has already happened in this guy's case. The government and the executive branch owe him nothing more than that, and had every right to deport him.
You mean, if an illegal jumps the fence into the arms of a Border Patrol agent they don't get to just declare "due process!" and get released into the country for as long as they have active cases/appeals?!!

The fact that foreigners belong to other nations makes them… different?!?

No!
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Florida State shooting will likely make this far less important to Democrats ...
2000AgPhD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Get Off My Lawn said:

2000AgPhD said:

Due process for an illegal works like this:

1. You establish the identity of the individual.
2. You determine that the individual is in the country illegally.
3. At that point, having violated the laws of the country, he is eligible for deportation

Literally and legally, that is it - and it has already happened in this guy's case. The government and the executive branch owe him nothing more than that, and had every right to deport him.
You mean, if an illegal jumps the fence into the arms of a Border Patrol agent they don't get to just declare "due process!" and get released into the country for as long as they have active cases/appeals?!!

The fact that foreigners belong to other nations makes them… different?!?

No!
Only under Democrat administrations, apparently.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gradin said:

Semantics. "facilitate" his return
That's not semantics.

The district court discussed "facilitate" and "effectuate" as 2 separate things.

Facilitate is setting things up to receive him here.

Effectuate is actively accomplishing it.

SCOTUS said the judge potentially over stepped her bounds with the latter.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gradin said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

Gradin said:

Semantics. "facilitate" his return
Words have meaning. You are intentionally misleading with your posts.

The President has no power to compel a sovereign foreign nation to turn over one of its citizens, a terrorist no less, to the United States. It is sheer lunacy that anyone would advocate for such a thing.


He did this before his due process though. It's super obvious that they took him away as quickly as possible which even the government admitted they did it in error initially. And El Salvador has already returned people back to the US so it's BS that they don't have the power to do it now.
His due process was done in 2019. He's deportable because of that.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Was. He gone.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
samurai_science said:

Gradin said:

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-administration-lies-kilmar-abrego-garcia-explained-1235318906/
Rollingstone, you just played yourself, take the L.



Rolling Fing Stone, JFC, troll alert
That story was so full of garbage it needs its own landfill...
sam callahan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Damn, I miss reading actual written discussions rather than trying to decipher tangled tweets.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's why it is so ****ing absurd that people are stanning for this thug. They're literally saying American will not be able to deport anyone.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.