obama judge micro manages trump to return illegal abrego garcia

89,457 Views | 1075 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by will25u
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rgvag11 said:

A lengthy processes that was not afforded to the person in this case?
This person went before a judge in 2019. He lost and was ordered deported. He appealed. He lost the appeal, too.

So, now you want him to get some EXTRA SPECIAL due process that NO ONE ELSE gets....
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

rgvag11 said:

A lengthy processes that was not afforded to the person in this case?
There is no reason for these district courts to enter TROs or prelim injunctions without a hearing. They can hold off ruling and set a time and date for a hearing. Create a record.

Here, the district courts did not immediately set those hearings, so the record upon appeal is very sparse, if one exists at all. And that makes appellate review very difficult.
The district courts are doing this on purpose - to MAKE it difficult...
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

aggiehawg said:

rgvag11 said:

A lengthy processes that was not afforded to the person in this case?
There is no reason for these district courts to enter TROs or prelim injunctions without a hearing. They can hold off ruling and set a time and date for a hearing. Create a record.

Here, the district courts did not immediately set those hearings, so the record upon appeal is very sparse, if one exists at all. And that makes appellate review very difficult.
The district courts are doing this on purpose - to MAKE it difficult...
Yeah but it was always a dilatory tactic, no more. And that wears out their welcome in the appellate courts pretty fast as we are beginning to see. Whatever benefit of the doubt appellate courts were granting their inferior court colleagues has worn thin and now they are being told to cut out this crap.
Troy91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yep, it has been a series of delay tactic without merit. They are running out of moves to stall with emergencies.

This is finally getting to courts that value ruling correctly over ruling quickly.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Ag with kids said:

aggiehawg said:

rgvag11 said:

A lengthy processes that was not afforded to the person in this case?
There is no reason for these district courts to enter TROs or prelim injunctions without a hearing. They can hold off ruling and set a time and date for a hearing. Create a record.

Here, the district courts did not immediately set those hearings, so the record upon appeal is very sparse, if one exists at all. And that makes appellate review very difficult.
The district courts are doing this on purpose - to MAKE it difficult...
Yeah but it was always a dilatory tactic, no more. And that wears out their welcome in the appellate courts pretty fast as we are beginning to see. Whatever benefit of the doubt appellate courts were granting their inferior court colleagues has worn thin and now they are being told to cut out this crap.
BigRobSA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag with kids said:

rgvag11 said:

A lengthy processes that was not afforded to the person in this case?
This person went before a judge in 2019. He lost and was ordered deported. He appealed. He lost the appeal, too.

So, now you want him to get some EXTRA SPECIAL due process that NO ONE ELSE gets....


How can you not feel for this wife-beating terrorist not getting his super-extra-special due process?!

And by that, of course, I mean my size 17s in his beech ass.
rgvag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigRob is going to really appreciate the
"First They Came" poem someday.
BigRobSA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rgvag11 said:

BigRob is going to really appreciate the
"First They Came" poem someday.


I'd be mistaken for KKK before I'd ever be mistaken as MS13.
rgvag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's quite an honor, Rob
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rgvag11 said:

BigRob is going to really appreciate the
"First They Came" poem someday.
So if you invaded another country and their solution was to fly you back home to your original country, you think the country you invaded should be required to fly you back, at their expense, house and feed you indefinitely, at their expense, provide you a lawyer, at their expense, then fly you back home, at their expense?

But you somehow think that opposing the above means US citizens should fear detention and deportation without due process?

What an absolutely bizarre take.
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:

rgvag11 said:

BigRob is going to really appreciate the
"First They Came" poem someday.
So if you invaded another country and their solution was to fly you back home to your original country, you think the country you invaded should be required to fly you back, at their expense, house and feed you indefinitely, at their expense, provide you a lawyer, at their expense, then fly you back home, at their expense?

But you somehow think that opposing the above means US citizens should fear detention and deportation without due process?

What an absolutely bizarre take.


According to CM, no amount of your tax dollars and freedom are too much to give away for the benefit of Future Democrat Voters
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bull***** Protecting criminals from justice has never been one of this nation's principles.


At least not until the modern era of the DOJ and the FBI.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

Bull***** Protecting criminals from justice has never been one of this nation's principles.


At least not until the modern era of the DOJ and the FBI.


Due process is to protect the innocent from getting railroaded.

******ed libs have turned it upside down and want to use it to prevent criminals from being punished.
Keller6Ag91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rgvag11 said:

That's quite an honor, Rob


Keep fighting the good fight of the entitled.

You're on the wrong side of this issue.
Gig'Em and God Bless,

JB'91
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rgvag11 said:

That's quite an honor, Rob
It's too bad you don't understand his joke...

It's funny...
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who else is shocked by this development???!??!


I'm Gipper
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Loyal employee trusted and respected by his boss / jefe. Kilmar has quite the resume.
93MarineHorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigRobSA said:

rgvag11 said:

BigRob is going to really appreciate the
"First They Came" poem someday.


I'd be mistaken for KKK before I'd ever be mistaken as MS13.
Coming for Rob would be no simple matter. They'd need one of those cranes to pull him out of the house!
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?

I'm Gipper
BigRobSA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
93MarineHorn said:

BigRobSA said:

rgvag11 said:

BigRob is going to really appreciate the
"First They Came" poem someday.


I'd be mistaken for KKK before I'd ever be mistaken as MS13.
Coming for Rob would be no simple matter. They'd need one of those cranes to pull him out of the house!


I make Bill Brasky look small.
damiond
How long do you want to ignore this user?


leftist courts can pound sand
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
happy days
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Babylon Bee makes the jokes!

Maybe Broasberg should enjoin the all of us from laughing at him..
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Still not back



Never coming back.

I'm Gipper
Queso1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
These guys don't care. They're getting their publicity.
FrioAg 00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They are trying desperately to keep this story alive, because it rallies their base. They've convinced themselves he had a right to be in the US, he is an innocent hard working father and Trump deported him "illegally". They are convinced Trump is defying a SCOTUS order, which really confirms what they want to believe about him being a dictator.



Of course, he wasn't here legally. He was a gang member, a human trafficker, a domestic abuser and a general leach on society. He was deported to his home, as he should have been, and the US has absolutely no jurisdiction over what happens to him the second he left our soil.

Now, I'm sure Trump enjoys that El Salvador has said no to returning him, but enjoying it doesn't mean anything legally. SCOTUS issued an order to do something that he doesn't actually have the authority to do. So the "so now what" is a pretty good question that Trump is willing to let sit there on the table.


I, for one, enjoy the screeching and mental gymnastics that liberals are still trying in the name of some awful human.
lcraggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:




He is a non citizen of the US. You don't represent him anymore.
Rangers Lead the Way, NSDQ


Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No, Glenn Ivey. You do not represent him.

He's a Salvadoran. In El Salvador.
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

No, Glenn Ivey. You do not represent him.

He's a Salvadoran. In El Salvador.
A U.S. Congressman does not know who he represents.. Typical Democrat.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
To be fair, the Democrat party more accurately represents the interests of the CCP, than any actual Americans.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
lcraggie said:

will25u said:




He is a non citizen of the US. You don't represent him anymore.
I guess he doesn't understand that other countries don't just bend the knee to liberal demands...
Deerdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DarkBrandon01 said:

EX TEXASEX said:

BINGO


Quote:

A review of Abrego Garcia's 2019 case before a federal immigration judge revealsas noted by Vice President Vancethat the court found sufficient evidence to determine that the El Salvadoran national was, in fact, a member of MS-13. The court's determination is the equivalent of a conviction.
https://thenationalpulse.com/2025/04/01/ms-13-hoax-alert-media-democrats-spin-gang-member-deportation-into-maryland-father-of-3-sob-story/


What crime did he commit while being in MS-13? I can put on blue bandanna and say i'm a crip and that doesn't make me a criminal.


well there was that tour guide gig where he was stopped in Tn hauling other illegal "tourists", and Biden's thugs let him go, but human trafficking probably is not illegal to you.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Deerdude said:

DarkBrandon01 said:

EX TEXASEX said:

BINGO


Quote:

A review of Abrego Garcia's 2019 case before a federal immigration judge revealsas noted by Vice President Vancethat the court found sufficient evidence to determine that the El Salvadoran national was, in fact, a member of MS-13. The court's determination is the equivalent of a conviction.
https://thenationalpulse.com/2025/04/01/ms-13-hoax-alert-media-democrats-spin-gang-member-deportation-into-maryland-father-of-3-sob-story/


What crime did he commit while being in MS-13? I can put on blue bandanna and say i'm a crip and that doesn't make me a criminal.


well there was that tour guide gig where he was stopped in Tn hauling other illegal "tourists", and Biden's thugs let him go, but human trafficking probably is not illegal to you.


Being in the country illegally is also a crime
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.