regional jet crash? (American Airlines) at Reagan (DCA)

190,023 Views | 1557 Replies | Last: 18 hrs ago by titan
Pinochet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
titan said:

FTAG 2000 said:

HtownAg19 said:

Rockdoc said:

I'm really falling to understand why ATC wasn't continuously screaming their heads off 15 to 20 seconds before the collision. Maybe they were and I missed it.


Helicopter reported CRJ in sight and were instructed to fly behind it. From that far away in the tower at night there's no way they would've been able to see they were on a direct course for the plane


Forget pilot comments. The ATC computer was yelling collision avoidance alert for a good 20 seconds before the crash. Plenty of time to intervene if they were paying attention to scope.
So that screen video is genuine. So this sounds like it means Artificial or automated traffic control would have prevented this indeed.

No. That's not the conclusion you should draw. You should draw the conclusion that the helicopter pilot misidentified and told a controller he had another airplane in sight. We aren't going to IFR separation minimums at all times. And AI isn't going to change the pilot in the cockpit.
johnnyblaze36
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Can someone please provide a quick legend of all the acronymns/abbreviations being used throughout this thread? It's very difficult to read through and understand what the hell is going on.

titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
CanyonAg77 said:

Blackhawks have radar????

They arent fighters, they dont have a radar to track planes, do they?
.
I would be stunned if they do not have radar.

WW II torpedo planes had radar. Today's helos are bigger in some ways.
PrestigeWorldwideAg12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DCA closed until 5am EST Friday now
Catag94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CanyonAg77 said:

Blackhawks have radar????

They arent fighters, they dont have a radar to track planes, do they?
.


ATC does!
chickencoupe16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
johnnyblaze36 said:

Can someone please provide a quick legend of all the acronymns/abbreviations being used throughout this thread? It's very difficult to read through and understand what the hell is going on.


Google is your friend unless you want to post the specific acronyms you're confused on.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
titan said:

CanyonAg77 said:

Blackhawks have radar????

They arent fighters, they dont have a radar to track planes, do they?
.
I would be stunned if they do not have radar.

WW II torpedo planes had radar. Today's helos are bigger in some ways.


They do not. Basically nothing in the air other than fighters or awacs have radar to detect aircraft. Good lord, people
91AggieLawyer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FTAG 2000 said:

annie88 said:

FTAG 2000 said:

Per NBC 4 Washington: both crash sites located.

Wrecks are closer to Anacostia-Bolling side of the Potomac. CRJ is "split in 2" in about 7 feet of water. The helicopter is bobbing upside down, varying between submerged and not. Divers are in the water and searching.

Water temp is 35 degrees. Roughly 25 minutes too before anyone alive in the water would die from hypothermia. They aren't pulling anyone out of the river alive at this point.

Don't know if it's true, but some reports saying that many of the passengers were still strapped in their seats underwater, which wouldn't be surprising. But take that with a grain of salt. Because we don't know.

Just a horrible, horrible thing. And the night time is making it so much harder to deal with.

Many of the people on Titanic survived the sinking but the water got them. So the cold water absolutely making this even more tragic, if that's possible.


I'm a dive instructor on the side of my day job. Just doing quick math on the water there at 35 degrees.

Anyone who survived into the water had two minutes to get their bearings before cold water shock and hypothermia started to set in. Which means loss of spatial awareness and full motor control. If they got out of the plane they had 25-30 minutes depending on body weight to get pulled out of water before succumbing to water temps.



You probably know more than I do about, but I'll give you my experience in cold water.

When I went river rafting at 17 years old in Colorado (probably close to the best physical shape of my life), I jumped in the water to help move the raft either to shore or away from shore (I can't recall) for/after lunch. It didn't take anywhere near 2 minutes for the shock of the cold water to start to affect me -- probably more like 45 seconds. And that was without the absolute shock of a plane crash or similar event, a fall, etc., and no injuries. When the water temp, which was likely far higher than 35 degrees at the time -- probably in the high 40s at the absolute coldest -- started getting to me, I was mostly unable to do much of anything. I could still maintain myself in the water (i.e. tread), hold on to the raft, but that was about it. I needed help to pull myself into the boat, and 2 buddies did just that (thus, I'm thinking we were leaving after lunch, but it doesn't matter). I'm pretty sure I was able to speak but had I gone the full 2 minutes, I'm not sure I would have been.

No one knows the power of a) water and b) COLD water unless they've been in it. Further, there's a tremendous difference between being in water in temps in the 60s (potentially VERY cold swimming pool in the early spring/late fall) and 50s (oceans/some lakes), and even a bigger difference between the 50s and lower. Its sort of like a logarithmic relationship rather than a linear one. While I have no doubt survival instincts and adrenaline would buy them a lot of time, you have to experience all that to believe it.
bthotugigem05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ATC = Air Traffic Control
CRJ-700 = the airline jet involved (stands for Canadair Regional Jet, although now own by Bombardier)
PSA = haven't seen this yet, but the jet was operated by PSA on behalf of American Airlines under their American Eagle brand.
DCA = one of the three airports in the Washington DC area. Today it is called Reagan National Airport, and if you ever call it Reagan around someone who lived there before the name changed they will immediately reply "oh you mean National?"
VMC = minimum control speed
Class B = this isn't an acronym but refers to Class B airspace, which exists around most large airports in the USA.

annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FTAG 2000 said:

annie88 said:

FTAG 2000 said:

Per NBC 4 Washington: both crash sites located.

Wrecks are closer to Anacostia-Bolling side of the Potomac. CRJ is "split in 2" in about 7 feet of water. The helicopter is bobbing upside down, varying between submerged and not. Divers are in the water and searching.

Water temp is 35 degrees. Roughly 25 minutes too before anyone alive in the water would die from hypothermia. They aren't pulling anyone out of the river alive at this point.

Don't know if it's true, but some reports saying that many of the passengers were still strapped in their seats underwater, which wouldn't be surprising. But take that with a grain of salt. Because we don't know.

Just a horrible, horrible thing. And the night time is making it so much harder to deal with.

Many of the people on Titanic survived the sinking but the water got them. So the cold water absolutely making this even more tragic, if that's possible.


I'm a dive instructor on the side of my day job. Just doing quick math on the water there at 35 degrees.

Anyone who survived into the water had two minutes to get their bearings before cold water shock and hypothermia started to set in. Which means loss of spatial awareness and full motor control. If they got out of the plane they had 25-30 minutes depending on body weight to get pulled out of water before succumbing to water temps.
Yeah, it was a bad deal all around. Horrible. I'd like to believe that most of them didn't realize what was going on. Or were dead on impact.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Pinochet said:

titan said:

FTAG 2000 said:

HtownAg19 said:

Rockdoc said:

I'm really falling to understand why ATC wasn't continuously screaming their heads off 15 to 20 seconds before the collision. Maybe they were and I missed it.


Helicopter reported CRJ in sight and were instructed to fly behind it. From that far away in the tower at night there's no way they would've been able to see they were on a direct course for the plane


Forget pilot comments. The ATC computer was yelling collision avoidance alert for a good 20 seconds before the crash. Plenty of time to intervene if they were paying attention to scope.
So that screen video is genuine. So this sounds like it means Artificial or automated traffic control would have prevented this indeed.

No. That's not the conclusion you should draw. You should draw the conclusion that the helicopter pilot misidentified and told a controller he had another airplane in sight. We aren't going to IFR separation minimums at all times. And AI isn't going to change the pilot in the cockpit.
Something is still missing there though. It has to be pretty common at airports like that there are multiple jets in the air and not far apart. There must be standard ways of making sure someone is talking about the same aircraft -- its the old "make sure the other knows when you say right side, you mean their actual left side or not, as the case may be" and of course the relative degree bearings with 0 assumed in front.

Something was still botched.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
titan said:

CanyonAg77 said:

Blackhawks have radar????

They arent fighters, they dont have a radar to track planes, do they?
.
I would be stunned if they do not have radar.

WW II torpedo planes had radar. Today's helos are bigger in some ways.
It's amazing when you think of the changes in radar from World War II. I mean, think about just fuzzy little dots that were showing coming towards Pearl Harbor compared to what they would see today. I believe they thought it was a group of inbound American planes coming from the coast.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
GAC06 said:

titan said:

CanyonAg77 said:

Blackhawks have radar????

They arent fighters, they dont have a radar to track planes, do they?
.
I would be stunned if they do not have radar.

WW II torpedo planes had radar. Today's helos are bigger in some ways.


They do not. Basically nothing in the air other than fighters or awacs have radar to detect aircraft. Good lord, people
They don't?? That's truly surprising. Then again, it never comes up -- no way to really know.
MsDoubleD81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Google
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PrestigeWorldwideAg12 said:

DCA closed until 5am EST Friday now
DCA=Washington Reagan National Airport
EST=Eastern Standard Time
Pinochet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Catag94 said:

Pinochet said:

Catag94 said:

1) VFR HC should not have been there.
2) once there, Vectors could have/should have been given to create separation.

ATC failure here IMHO.


It's a ridiculous opinion but ok. Nothing wrong with another aircraft being there in VMC. See and avoid. Helicopter even said he saw the other aircraft and would pass behind. Until the last second when the RJ descended, they had vertical separation as well. Our airspace doesn't (and shouldn't) run on some weird 3 mile separation standard in VMC. To think it should is a misunderstanding of how all the radar and GPS surveillance systems work and work together.


I'm not sure you're following why I say the HC shouldn't bee there.
You do realize the HC was roughly 150-300' AGL in the glide path of a normal approach (visual or otherwise) to a runway inside of 1 mile of the threshold. What ATC would authorize a VFR craft to do that? It is Class B airspace after all.

If the HC is going to be 300' AGL, get him further from the airport. Or, put him over the center of the airport - somewhere out of approach paths.

What the hell is ridiculous about that? It's what the ATC in DFW class B does everyday.

I've seen them take helicopters through the B plenty. If it's VMC and they maintain their own obstacle clearance, it's common.
agdaddy04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Happens all the time up here in small bodies of water. People go on their SUPs w/o life jacket and fall off. They'll find them dead a few hours later. The cold water is no joke.
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pinochet said:

Catag94 said:

Pinochet said:

Catag94 said:

1) VFR HC should not have been there.
2) once there, Vectors could have/should have been given to create separation.

ATC failure here IMHO.


It's a ridiculous opinion but ok. Nothing wrong with another aircraft being there in VMC. See and avoid. Helicopter even said he saw the other aircraft and would pass behind. Until the last second when the RJ descended, they had vertical separation as well. Our airspace doesn't (and shouldn't) run on some weird 3 mile separation standard in VMC. To think it should is a misunderstanding of how all the radar and GPS surveillance systems work and work together.


I'm not sure you're following why I say the HC shouldn't bee there.
You do realize the HC was roughly 150-300' AGL in the glide path of a normal approach (visual or otherwise) to a runway inside of 1 mile of the threshold. What ATC would authorize a VFR craft to do that? It is Class B airspace after all.

If the HC is going to be 300' AGL, get him further from the airport. Or, put him over the center of the airport - somewhere out of approach paths.

What the hell is ridiculous about that? It's what the ATC in DFW class B does everyday.

I've seen them take helicopters through the B plenty. If it's VMC and they maintain their own obstacle clearance, it's common.
Helo seemed to be following the Potomac. I wonder if it is common practice to have them fly a corridor down the river
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agdaddy04 said:

Happens all the time up here in small bodies of water. People go on their SUPs w/o life jacket and fall off. They'll find them dead a few hours later. The cold water is no joke.
Cold in general is no joke. Think of all the people who die each year on all the mountains around the world like Everest, and even up in the Montana/Wyoming areas and many others in the US. And some of them are very experienced hikers and climbers. I think on average at least 10 to 20 people die each year in these places. Some of that has to do with the oxygen, of course but cold weather, water or snow can be brutal.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Very common
Catag94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I've flown VFR through B plenty. They still give vectors for traffics to VFR traffic. And I've never seen them put VFR traffic in the approach path of a runway unless the altitude was well separated from potential approaching/departing aircraft.

So, I would have expected ATC to vector that HC away from that possibility.

As others have told the conspiracy theorists here, to much had to happen just right for that to be intentional. This is true and also means very little vectoring from ATC would have avoided this.

I also can imagine blind spots for both and misidentification being a possible issue for the HC.

However, I still say ATC is responsible for allowing him to be even close to that exact spot.

ETA: again, the HC was basically straight down the runway extended line .75 miles from the threshold, 300 ' above the ground. This is nuts.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
annie88 said:

agdaddy04 said:

Happens all the time up here in small bodies of water. People go on their SUPs w/o life jacket and fall off. They'll find them dead a few hours later. The cold water is no joke.
Cold in general is no joke. Think of all the people who die each year on all the mountains around the world like Everest, and even up in the Montana/Wyoming areas and many others in the US. And some of them are very experienced hikers and climbers. I think on average at least 10 to 20 people die each year in these places. Some of that has to do with the oxygen, of course but cold weather, water or snow can be brutal.
THIS. Its one reason find the whole global warming pumped up hysteria so absurd --- its the change to a few degrees colder than can really start wrecking civilization. Technology can counterbalance heat easier.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?



"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Coppell97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S

Wonder if President Trump is basing that on any kind of telemetry that is better than the three videos we have seen? Or even a better video?
chickencoupe16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Coppell97 said:


For all the good of Trump, he often says what he thinks almost as soon as he thinks it. He might as well have copied and pasted from this thread.
AggieFlyboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GAC06 said:

titan said:

CanyonAg77 said:

Blackhawks have radar????

They arent fighters, they dont have a radar to track planes, do they?
.
I would be stunned if they do not have radar.

WW II torpedo planes had radar. Today's helos are bigger in some ways.


They do not. Basically nothing in the air other than fighters or awacs have radar to detect aircraft. Good lord, people


No, they have TCAS (Traffic Avoidance Collision System)…every airplane has a Transponder that sends out a signal. Every Commercial aircraft has TCAS which can pickup and display other aircraft positions to the pilot. Radar in commercial aircraft is primarily used for WX avoidance. HH-60s don't have TCAS or radar, but they still send out a signal, which is how ATC tracks them.

Radar would be unnecessary
IDaggie06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Coppell97 said:




Dumb Trump. Way too soon for this type of post.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Coppell97 said:


He is saying it was flying in a straight line and asking why it didn't try to avoid the collision.

Why has been discussed in this thread from the beginning.

If Trump had been told it was intentional, it would have said so.

Nick Sortor loves his click bait tweets.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
titan said:


Wonder if President Trump is basing that on any kind of telemetry that is better than the three videos we have seen? Or even a better video?
Well, if he said that, he's not technically wrong, it should've been a prevented we just don't know what the actual problem was. But when you factor in human error, tragedy can always be very close behind.
Marauder Blue 6
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FTAG 2000 said:

Damn. In the chaos after the crash another American jet told to abort landing flew right over the White House. Great job, dc ATC

https://www.flightaware.com/live/flight/JIA5347/history/20250129/2349Z/KRSW/KIAD


The flight path in the link clearly shows that it did not fly "right over" the White House.
BoxingAg84
How long do you want to ignore this user?
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
chickencoupe16 said:

Coppell97 said:


For all the good of Trump, he often says what he thinks almost as soon as he thinks it. He might as well have copied and pasted from this thread.
That's certainly a risk, and I hope not. Its way too soon if so. HOWEVER, for all we know he has a fourth or fifth video closer to the quality of the Francis Scott Key bridge one ---- which makes clear what he is saying is true. Even one of these just a good bit closer would have been enough for me to tell if either T-boned the other. But we are too far away. Maybe he has seen one that is better?
chickencoupe16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
titan said:

chickencoupe16 said:

Coppell97 said:


For all the good of Trump, he often says what he thinks almost as soon as he thinks it. He might as well have copied and pasted from this thread.
That's certainly a risk, and I hope not. Its way too soon if so. HOWEVER, for all we know he has a fourth or fifth video closer to the quality of the Francis Scott Key bridge one ---- which makes clear what he is saying is true. Even one of these just a good bit closer would have been enough for me to tell if either T-boned the other. But we are too far away. Maybe he has seen one that is better?
He could have. Who knows? He could have the heads of the alphabet agencies standing in the Oval Office right now. He could also be scrolling through X as he lays in bed.

This is a big deal to us, but I'm not sure it moves the needle for the President quite as much. I imagine him seeing it on X, sending a few texts for details, maybe making a call or two, and then tweeting right before he falls asleep.

P.S. Can I still say tweeting? Should it be X-ing?
ETFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Catag94 said:

Pinochet said:

Catag94 said:

1) VFR HC should not have been there.
2) once there, Vectors could have/should have been given to create separation.

ATC failure here IMHO.


It's a ridiculous opinion but ok. Nothing wrong with another aircraft being there in VMC. See and avoid. Helicopter even said he saw the other aircraft and would pass behind. Until the last second when the RJ descended, they had vertical separation as well. Our airspace doesn't (and shouldn't) run on some weird 3 mile separation standard in VMC. To think it should is a misunderstanding of how all the radar and GPS surveillance systems work and work together.


I'm not sure you're following why I say the HC shouldn't bee there.
You do realize the HC was roughly 150-300' AGL in the glide path of a normal approach (visual or otherwise) to a runway inside of 1 mile of the threshold. What ATC would authorize a VFR craft to do that? It is Class B airspace after all.

If the HC is going to be 300' AGL, get him further from the airport. Or, put him over the center of the airport - somewhere out of approach paths.

What the hell is ridiculous about that? It's what the ATC in DFW class B does everyday.
Helicopter routes. Check out Route 1/4 on this chart. Notice the altitude restriction for those routes (200' near 33 approach). How high was the heli?

https://aeronav.faa.gov/visual/12-26-2024/PDFs/Balt-Wash_Heli.pdf


Balt-Wash_Heli.pdf



 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.