regional jet crash? (American Airlines) at Reagan (DCA)

190,004 Views | 1557 Replies | Last: 18 hrs ago by titan
fc2112
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So will all the helo goal tenders find their way back?
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Quote:

This wasn't just one mistake, it was a cascade of failures. 67 lives gone.

Cascade of failures... RIP
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Swiss Cheese
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
doubledog said:



Quote:

This wasn't just one mistake, it was a cascade of failures. 67 lives gone.

Cascade of failures... RIP
Every single crash is.

Take out just one thing and the accident never happens.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
txags92 said:

Jetpilot86 said:

The answer will be restricted helo ops as visual landings are happening on that runway.
Yeah, seems like allowing them to proceed on visual separation, particularly at night, is prone to allowing aircraft to get way too close to each other.
Made worse by the apparent lack of visual ques. "Do you have the CRJ in sight NOT being followed by any # such as "at " your hand, clock, bearing, whatever, just seems inadequate and would not take many more words.

Sounds like at bare minimum they need to up the "look for" info given to any aircraft. That there was even a possibility they were looking at the wrong airliner imo is largely due to that lack of direction to look/confirm.

NOT saying that is the cause here --- its just something that is an obvious source of risk.

Looks like it is mostly if not entirely helo's fault or failure (if instruments) and also a certain lack of urgency on traffic control.
FrioAg 00:
Leftist Democrats "have completely overplayed the Racism accusation. Honestly my first reaction when I hear it today is to assume bad intentions by the accuser, not the accused."
rwtxag83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Any government helicopter operating in that area should be flying nap of the earth for all practical purposes. Day or night, those pilots should have a much better guage of their altitude visually. They should know by looking out the front that their altitude exceeds the established maximum.

Common sense should take over when you are flying right through a final approach lane for heavy traffic of commercial aircraft. They should have been so low they could almost drag through the water.

It's a very small area in relative terms for a high performance aircraft to pass through. Go to nearly minimum allowable altitude for a minute or two until you pass through the dangerous area.

How freaking hard is this? It seems pretty straightforward to me.

Army helicopter pilots are by far the best I served with, but I think they royally ****ed this up. This should NEVER happen.

Greater love hath no man than this....
Kenneth_2003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
IF that tweet is correct that bird should have NEVER been in the air.

Check this Blancolirio where he chats up some Cali NG guys that stopped in at his local airfield during a training. Same/similar Lima model and he discusses the barometric altimeters.



EDIT.. He confirms NTSB said they had a 100ft discrepancy between the two barometric altimeters.
He said and gets a thumbs up from the NG pilot they should be within 50ft, and should be within 75ft of the known field elevation when set

Or is that for IFR only and they were flying VFR?
Blackhorse83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
As a former Army Aviator I am still following this closely. I found this article very interesting and disturbing as it appears to shed some light on the capabilities of the current Army Aviation organization.

Exclusive: Army Was Sending Junior Pilots Straight from Flight School to Fly Top DC Missions Until 2023

"In fact, the aviator said, the Army was so strapped for experienced pilots that up through 2023 it was sending its most junior pilots fresh out of flight school to fly these specialized missions. At one point, an estimated 40 percent of the pilots assigned to these missions, which can include evacuating leaders in the event of an attack, were on their first assignment, the aviator said."

"The aviator said flight school standards have gone down just to push out more pilots, and that flying time has been cut in half compared to 20 years ago."
Scouts Out
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
...and let's be honest: enlistments plummeted because of all the nonsense the Biden social engineers were foisting on the military. From covid "vaccines" to sensitivity training, DEI, whatever. I can't tell you how many complaints I heard from people who had been in for a long time.




chickencoupe16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's more than problematic but this has been the way of the American military since its inception; huge increase in personnel, funding, training, leadership, and experience during war then piss it all away during peacetime. It should change, but it won't, especially with weapon systems only becoming more and more expensive to build and maintain.
TX_COWDOC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
KGF?
www.southpawprecision.com
Type 07 FFL / Class 2 SOT
Nightforce Optics Dealer
AGM Night Vision Dealer
AgLiving06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

BREAKING: The NTSB just dropped the Blackhawk helicopter's black box recordings from the deadly Washington, DC crash with a commercial jetand it's a jaw-dropper. Here's what it tells us:

Altitude Chaos: The chopper's altimeter was offway off. Pilot read 300 feet, instructor saw 400, but the real number? 278 feetwell above the 200-foot ceiling. They were flying blind on bad data.

Help me understand this?

Is this saying the pilots thought they were higher above the ceiling than they actually were? This doesn't help their case since they should have been below 200 on their own readings right?
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgLiving06 said:

Quote:

BREAKING: The NTSB just dropped the Blackhawk helicopter's black box recordings from the deadly Washington, DC crash with a commercial jetand it's a jaw-dropper. Here's what it tells us:

Altitude Chaos: The chopper's altimeter was offway off. Pilot read 300 feet, instructor saw 400, but the real number? 278 feetwell above the 200-foot ceiling. They were flying blind on bad data.

Help me understand this?

Is this saying the pilots thought they were higher above the ceiling than they actually were? This doesn't help their case since they should have been below 200 on their own readings right?
They are saying that the altimeters used by the pilot and copilot were calibrated 100' differently from each other, and their actual altitude was 178' above what the pilot was seeing and 78' above what the instructor was seeing. So the pilot was seeing an altimeter that told her she was 100' above the ceiling (within the +/- 150 that I believe the Army allows), the copilot saw them at 200' above the ceiling (outside the +/- 150), and their actual altitude was over twice as high as they were cleared to be.
Kenneth_2003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Over on Mover & Gonkey (YouTube), Gonkey felt she was behind the aircraft and both he and Wombat thought the IP (I think both have worked as instructors) felt he was too hands off
TexasAggiesWin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Sounding like/looking like the Blackhawk crew was flying at absolutely the wrong altitude although they had indications that their instruments were off. It also seems like the standard response by the Blackhawk crew to ATC in this situation regarding other traffic, regardless of what ATC said, was "Traffic in sight" so that the Blackhawk could continue on their own maintaining visual separation. I say that because the speed in which they answer that they have the traffic in sight, at most a second after the ATC advises them of traffic, sounds like a 'canned' response rather than them actually looking for and identifying other air traffic.
frorge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Has there been any indication of how the majority of passengers were found in the wreckage?

Ie still in seatbelts assuming quick impact related death or chaotically pilled in a fuselage like the were fighting to escaped
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hitting the water at 130+mph, I doubt anyone was conscious after impact.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S

If its true the crj had time to just start to try to pull up, the instinct of passengers would be to hunker down, not jump up. Grim scene either way.
FrioAg 00:
Leftist Democrats "have completely overplayed the Racism accusation. Honestly my first reaction when I hear it today is to assume bad intentions by the accuser, not the accused."
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.