***** Official Trump 47 Admin Court Battles *****

424,947 Views | 3454 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by nortex97
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good.

Great; Bozoberg spanked.


USA Pirro noted he is illegally blocking grand jury investigation into Federal Reserve.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What a beatdown on the bald clown:


Quote:

An intrusive criminal contempt investigation...dead end. Justice cannot rely on the unstated intentions of a district judge.

It's almost as though I could have written this order.
Aggie Jurist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It is long past time for Roberts to address Boasberg.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97 said:

What a beatdown on the bald clown:

Quote:

An intrusive criminal contempt investigation...dead end. Justice cannot rely on the unstated intentions of a district judge.

It's almost as though I could have written this order.

Boasberg is a criminal and has proven himself to be such on numerous occasions. At the very least, he has repeatedly obstructed justice. He has done much more, though.
Tailgate88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie Jurist said:

It is long past time for Roberts to address Boasberg.


Help us IANALs out … is the above from Roberts to Boasberg? I can't tell from the X posts who authored it.

Either way glad to see that d**khead get spanked. He ought to be impeached.
Aggie Jurist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Help us IANALs out … is the above from Roberts to Boasberg? I can't tell from the X posts who authored it.

Either way glad to see that d**khead get spanked. He ought to be impeached.

no, the above is from the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, but Roberts has oversight responsibility for the District Court judges and needs to exercise some.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggie Jurist said:

It is long past time for Roberts to address Boasberg.


The guy needs to be removed from the bench!
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie Jurist said:

Quote:

Help us IANALs out … is the above from Roberts to Boasberg? I can't tell from the X posts who authored it.

Either way glad to see that d**khead get spanked. He ought to be impeached.

no, the above is from the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, but Roberts has oversight responsibility for the District Court judges and needs to exercise some.

This is the SECOND writ of mandamus the DC Circuit Court of Appeals has issued to Boasberg.

That should open up Roberts' eyes that Boasberg is doing something pretty bad...
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logos Stick said:

Aggie Jurist said:

It is long past time for Roberts to address Boasberg.


The guy needs to be removed from the bench!

You misspelled hung.
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FTAG 2000 said:

Logos Stick said:

Aggie Jurist said:

It is long past time for Roberts to address Boasberg.


The guy needs to be removed from the bench!

You misspelled hung.

I think it's spelled hanged. Yes, grammar police here.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Prosperdick said:

FTAG 2000 said:

Logos Stick said:

Aggie Jurist said:

It is long past time for Roberts to address Boasberg.


The guy needs to be removed from the bench!

You misspelled hung.

I think it's spelled hanged. Yes, grammar police here.

txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

Prosperdick said:

FTAG 2000 said:

Logos Stick said:

Aggie Jurist said:

It is long past time for Roberts to address Boasberg.


The guy needs to be removed from the bench!

You misspelled hung.

I think it's spelled hanged. Yes, grammar police here.



Brings to mind the guy sitting on his front porch with a beer watching his wife as she mowed the front yard while wearing short shorts and a thin tank top. An old lady walking by on the sidewalk looks at his wife sweating while she works and then glares at the guy who is drinking the beer. "You ought to be hung!" she spat at him. "I am" he said back with a smile. "Why do you think she is the one mowing the grass?"
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think we can all agree that Boasberg is hung like a tic tac if he even still has any genitalia.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The dissenting judge in the Boasberg ***** slap, J. Michelle Childs, is another Biden appointed DEI judge.

Wrote an 80 page ranting dissent.
Aggie Jurist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

The dissenting judge in the Boasberg ***** slap, J. Michelle Childs, is another Biden appointed DEI judge.

Actually quite disappointed in Childs. She was in line for the SCOTUS slot KBJ took. Childs was seen as too moderate - and my experience before her proved that out. She was a good, even-handed District Court Judge (for a Dem). I actually obtained some favorable rulings in her court.

She was put on the DC Circuit as a consolation to Jim Clyburn who wanted her on SCOTUS. Terribly sad to me that she chose to carry Biden/Obama/Boesberg's water in such a ridiculous case that required mandamus.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
While utterly wrong, Childs' opinion is at least written in proper legal English, and is not filled with vacuous one word exclamations and wholly irrelevant references. No one can hold a candle to justice DEI, imho.

Ship putting out an article tomorrow;

Personally, I doubt it goes en banc.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I triple dog dare anyone to watch this without laughing.

I also saw that Sotomayor actually issued a public apology for her public insult of Kavanaugh. Credit to her for that.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I also saw that Sotomayor actually issued a public apology for her public insult of Kavanaugh. Credit to her for that.

C.J. Roberts probably chewed her azz out about that. The reputation of the Court is always foremost to him. If Scalia and RBG could put aside partisan disagreements to be collegial, surely a "Wise Latina" can.
We fixed the keg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I have no words ... Definition of DEI. Completely unqualified to be a judge, forget sitting on the Supreme Court. Maybe because its IRS rape-day, but I am too disgusted to laugh.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well, sorry. And of course it is the SCOTUS emergency docket where judicial restraint should be shown, per clown DEI, yet not this stuff.


Disappointed to see Ship take this position, even if it's just dispassionate. I'd think any semblance of intent by Roberts to not affirm such a ruling would be conveyed on this one, if it exists.
We fixed the keg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I meant no disrespect. I appreciate your contributions to this thread immensely, but if even if I would never hit a woman, 'I would sure shake the hell outta her." Hat tip to Chris Rock

nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No worries sir, I laughed so much at her (as usual) I couldn't help but assume others would. I suspect that in private discussions, the serious Democrat-communists are thoroughly embarrassed by her.

In all seriousness, criminal referral of Ciaramella could just be an interesting prosecution, with a new AG and a lot of politics around the fake impeachments (which might be expunged, in a sane world).

We fixed the keg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
All these 'orange-man-bad' cheerleaders backing these actions and convincing themselves that the ends justify the means without stopping to think the levers could be flipped and the monster they support today could be the one ruining their lives tomorrow.

'Hidden/secretive FISA courts will make us safer and never be used maliciously against Americans] ... and now that its in existence it is just another tool in the bad actors toolkit.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yes, and the power of FISA/secret courts etc. is exactly why they now toss the label at trump of being a 'king' or autocrat etc.

Separately, update: the NYT still exists in some parallel world of legal reasoning/history.


But I suppose as with justice DEI, little things like 'jurisdiction' and 'judicial restraint' don't apply to district court judges, to the NYT.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.