***** Official Trump 47 Admin Court Battles *****

424,947 Views | 3454 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by nortex97
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 9:52a, 4/14/26
AG
Good.

Great; Bozoberg spanked.


USA Pirro noted he is illegally blocking grand jury investigation into Federal Reserve.
Reply Quote
11
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 10:09a, 4/14/26
AG
What a beatdown on the bald clown:


Quote:
An intrusive criminal contempt investigation...dead end. Justice cannot rely on the unstated intentions of a district judge.

It's almost as though I could have written this order.
Reply Quote
8
Aggie Jurist
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 10:10a, 4/14/26
AG
It is long past time for Roberts to address Boasberg.
Reply Quote
22
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 10:20a, 4/14/26
nortex97 said:
What a beatdown on the bald clown:

Quote:
An intrusive criminal contempt investigation...dead end. Justice cannot rely on the unstated intentions of a district judge.

It's almost as though I could have written this order.

Boasberg is a criminal and has proven himself to be such on numerous occasions. At the very least, he has repeatedly obstructed justice. He has done much more, though.
Reply Quote
12
Tailgate88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aggie Jurist • 11:10a, 4/14/26
AG
Aggie Jurist said:
It is long past time for Roberts to address Boasberg.


Help us IANALs out … is the above from Roberts to Boasberg? I can't tell from the X posts who authored it.

Either way glad to see that d**khead get spanked. He ought to be impeached.
Reply Quote
4
Aggie Jurist
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Tailgate88 • 11:19a, 4/14/26
AG
Quote:
Help us IANALs out … is the above from Roberts to Boasberg? I can't tell from the X posts who authored it.

Either way glad to see that d**khead get spanked. He ought to be impeached.

no, the above is from the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, but Roberts has oversight responsibility for the District Court judges and needs to exercise some.
Reply Quote
11
Logos Stick
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aggie Jurist • 11:31a, 4/14/26
Aggie Jurist said:
It is long past time for Roberts to address Boasberg.


The guy needs to be removed from the bench!
Reply Quote
6
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aggie Jurist • 11:37a, 4/14/26
AG
Aggie Jurist said:
Quote:
Help us IANALs out … is the above from Roberts to Boasberg? I can't tell from the X posts who authored it.

Either way glad to see that d**khead get spanked. He ought to be impeached.

no, the above is from the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, but Roberts has oversight responsibility for the District Court judges and needs to exercise some.

This is the SECOND writ of mandamus the DC Circuit Court of Appeals has issued to Boasberg.

That should open up Roberts' eyes that Boasberg is doing something pretty bad...
Reply Quote
12
FTAG 2000
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Logos Stick • 11:48a, 4/14/26
AG
Logos Stick said:
Aggie Jurist said:
It is long past time for Roberts to address Boasberg.


The guy needs to be removed from the bench!

You misspelled hung.
Reply Quote
9
Prosperdick
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FTAG 2000 • 11:57a, 4/14/26
AG
FTAG 2000 said:
Logos Stick said:
Aggie Jurist said:
It is long past time for Roberts to address Boasberg.


The guy needs to be removed from the bench!

You misspelled hung.

I think it's spelled hanged. Yes, grammar police here.
Reply Quote
6
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Prosperdick • 12:52p, 4/14/26
AG
Prosperdick said:
FTAG 2000 said:
Logos Stick said:
Aggie Jurist said:
It is long past time for Roberts to address Boasberg.


The guy needs to be removed from the bench!

You misspelled hung.

I think it's spelled hanged. Yes, grammar police here.

Reply Quote
12
txags92
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ag with kids • 1:12p, 4/14/26
AG
Ag with kids said:
Prosperdick said:
FTAG 2000 said:
Logos Stick said:
Aggie Jurist said:
It is long past time for Roberts to address Boasberg.


The guy needs to be removed from the bench!

You misspelled hung.

I think it's spelled hanged. Yes, grammar police here.


Brings to mind the guy sitting on his front porch with a beer watching his wife as she mowed the front yard while wearing short shorts and a thin tank top. An old lady walking by on the sidewalk looks at his wife sweating while she works and then glares at the guy who is drinking the beer. "You ought to be hung!" she spat at him. "I am" he said back with a smile. "Why do you think she is the one mowing the grass?"
Reply Quote
8
1 edit
Prosperdick
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:24p, 4/14/26
AG
I think we can all agree that Boasberg is hung like a tic tac if he even still has any genitalia.
Reply Quote
5
Rapier108
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:19p, 4/14/26
The dissenting judge in the Boasberg ***** slap, J. Michelle Childs, is another Biden appointed DEI judge.

Wrote an 80 page ranting dissent.
Reply Quote
7
1 edit
Aggie Jurist
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rapier108 • 2:36p, 4/14/26
AG
Quote:
The dissenting judge in the Boasberg ***** slap, J. Michelle Childs, is another Biden appointed DEI judge.

Actually quite disappointed in Childs. She was in line for the SCOTUS slot KBJ took. Childs was seen as too moderate - and my experience before her proved that out. She was a good, even-handed District Court Judge (for a Dem). I actually obtained some favorable rulings in her court.

She was put on the DC Circuit as a consolation to Jim Clyburn who wanted her on SCOTUS. Terribly sad to me that she chose to carry Biden/Obama/Boesberg's water in such a ridiculous case that required mandamus.
Reply Quote
9
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aggie Jurist • 4:54p, 4/14/26
AG
While utterly wrong, Childs' opinion is at least written in proper legal English, and is not filled with vacuous one word exclamations and wholly irrelevant references. No one can hold a candle to justice DEI, imho.

Ship putting out an article tomorrow;

Personally, I doubt it goes en banc.
Reply Quote
5
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:05p, 4/15/26
Reply Quote
5
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:41p, 4/15/26
AG
I triple dog dare anyone to watch this without laughing.

I also saw that Sotomayor actually issued a public apology for her public insult of Kavanaugh. Credit to her for that.
Reply Quote
11
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 5:49p, 4/15/26
AG
Quote:
I also saw that Sotomayor actually issued a public apology for her public insult of Kavanaugh. Credit to her for that.

C.J. Roberts probably chewed her azz out about that. The reputation of the Court is always foremost to him. If Scalia and RBG could put aside partisan disagreements to be collegial, surely a "Wise Latina" can.
Reply Quote
4
We fixed the keg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 6:39p, 4/15/26
AG
I have no words ... Definition of DEI. Completely unqualified to be a judge, forget sitting on the Supreme Court. Maybe because its IRS rape-day, but I am too disgusted to laugh.
Reply Quote
8
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to We fixed the keg • 6:58p, 4/15/26
AG
Well, sorry. And of course it is the SCOTUS emergency docket where judicial restraint should be shown, per clown DEI, yet not this stuff.


Disappointed to see Ship take this position, even if it's just dispassionate. I'd think any semblance of intent by Roberts to not affirm such a ruling would be conveyed on this one, if it exists.
Reply Quote
1
We fixed the keg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 8:36p, 4/15/26
AG
I meant no disrespect. I appreciate your contributions to this thread immensely, but if even if I would never hit a woman, 'I would sure shake the hell outta her." Hat tip to Chris Rock

Reply Quote
4
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to We fixed the keg • 9:08p, 4/15/26
AG
No worries sir, I laughed so much at her (as usual) I couldn't help but assume others would. I suspect that in private discussions, the serious Democrat-communists are thoroughly embarrassed by her.

In all seriousness, criminal referral of Ciaramella could just be an interesting prosecution, with a new AG and a lot of politics around the fake impeachments (which might be expunged, in a sane world).

Reply Quote
4
We fixed the keg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 9:31p, 4/15/26
AG
All these 'orange-man-bad' cheerleaders backing these actions and convincing themselves that the ends justify the means without stopping to think the levers could be flipped and the monster they support today could be the one ruining their lives tomorrow.

'Hidden/secretive FISA courts will make us safer and never be used maliciously against Americans] ... and now that its in existence it is just another tool in the bad actors toolkit.
Reply Quote
5
1 edit
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to We fixed the keg • 8:21a
AG
Yes, and the power of FISA/secret courts etc. is exactly why they now toss the label at trump of being a 'king' or autocrat etc.

Separately, update: the NYT still exists in some parallel world of legal reasoning/history.


But I suppose as with justice DEI, little things like 'jurisdiction' and 'judicial restraint' don't apply to district court judges, to the NYT.
Reply Quote
4
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.