VP at Pierce and Pierce said:
I've posted this several times but I have been told by multiple people that don't know each other that Jerry is cash poor. One guy has ties to another nfl franchise and another guy rubs elbows with his family as they are all Arkansas big cigars. He's leveraged to the hilt and not all of his business ventures are a huge hit and some eat into cash while not generating a lot of cash.
That may be true, I have no idea. My point is it's irrelevant to this discussion. Jerry being cash poor has nothing to do with him waiting longer to sign guys. For one, that's just a fundamental misunderstanding of how players are paid. Two, waiting longer to sign contracts leads to requiring MORE money especially up front. In their world where owner cash flow determines their ability to sign contracts, a cash poor owner just wouldn't be re-signing guys. Jerry resigns his guys to a fault and does so in a manner that usually costs him more money. Signing them later at greater cost that would outweigh the extra interest on their invested cash, again in the scenario where that's how things worked (it isn't). And again, Dallas' annual net revenue is greater than the net returns of most NFL owners entire portfolio. If Jerry is cash poor then he's leveraged to an incredible degree.
The whole argument is just nonsensical.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full
Medical Disclaimer.