This movie is surely awful for the Wonder Woman franchise and a complete disappointment, but it's nowhere near the level of Suicide Squad or Fantastic Four in terms of terrible comic book movies.
oragator said:
I have been avoiding this movie like the plague, given the reviews I have read here and elsewhere.
But now I'm wondering if I need to watch it out of morbid curiosity. I don't smoke weed, but maybe this movie is a good time to start.
The only way a movie gets made this terribly is by everyone saying "yes, that's great" to every stupid idea.Sex Panther said:
lol yeah, I cracked up at that. She pulled a Clark Kent I guess? I just went back and rewatched it... I can just see on the set someone pointing out over and over again how something doesn't make sense and Patty Jenkins saying repeatedly - "Nah...It's fine"
Quote:
7. Is WW immune from electrocution? I'm not an expert on her powers, but why didn't she get electrocuted when Kristen Wiig did?
FtBendTxAg said:
Rotten Tomatoes must be broken.
That is a decent point I guess. At least they tried something different.Quote:
Even though the whole wishing stone guy was pretty dumb, it was at least original. No aliens or gods to defeat at the end. I think, given better writing, it could have been interesting. What if the guy was actually trying to help people, not realizing he was also destroying the world by doing it? I think that would have made for a more interesting dilemma.
Its super original if you pretend Aladdin doesn't exist.double aught said:That is a decent point I guess. At least they tried something different.Quote:
Even though the whole wishing stone guy was pretty dumb, it was at least original. No aliens or gods to defeat at the end. I think, given better writing, it could have been interesting. What if the guy was actually trying to help people, not realizing he was also destroying the world by doing it? I think that would have made for a more interesting dilemma.
AustinAg2K said:
All that said, I think I liked it better than the first one, and better than any of the Justice League movies. Of course, take everything with a grain of salt, because I think Suicide Squad is probably my favorite of the recent (post-Nolan) DC movies.
dave94 said:AustinAg2K said:
All that said, I think I liked it better than the first one, and better than any of the Justice League movies. Of course, take everything with a grain of salt, because I think Suicide Squad is probably my favorite of the recent (post-Nolan) DC movies.
This statement makes zero sense. You basically said the entire movie was terrible but then said it was better than the first one? And all of the paragraphs of text were just to point out the bad and then say it was good? I'm so very confused.
I just read this article and found out there was an after credits scene. Did anyone stick around to actually watch it? I know I didn't.TCTTS said:
https://screencrush.com/wonder-woman-1984-continuity-issues/
That's actually hilarious. It was made very clear that Asteria died. It's like they knew the rest of the movie made no sense and were like "ah, screw it".M.C. Swag said:
lol it's nothing special. they just show Lynda Carter (OG wonder woman) casted as "Asteria" walking around a market square or whatever tf. Which, if you think about it, kinda ****s with the whole mythology of "their greatest warrior sacrificing herself. Like, even in the end credits they **** up their own story.
JJxvi said:
Smart writing could have made her appearance the result of an errant unrenounced wish.
AustinAg2K said:
Speaking of the armor, what was so great about it? It lasted all of thirty seconds before it was destroyed by Cheetah.
Reminds me of the B&I board where one of the day traders usually responds to himself on trade ideas that worked or didn't work to show the thought process.West Point Aggie said:TCTTS said:
Everything about this movie just continues to get dumber and dumber.
You replied to yourself?
West Point Aggie said:TCTTS said:
Everything about this movie just continues to get dumber and dumber.
You replied to yourself?
It reminded me of Rocky III when he spends 3 months training with Apollo to be faster than Clubber Lang and do the jab and move on him, then abandons that strategy in the first 90 seconds of the fight.AustinAg2K said:
Speaking of the armor, what was so great about it? It lasted all of thirty seconds before it was destroyed by Cheetah.
AustinAg2K said:
Speaking of the armor, what was so great about it? It lasted all of thirty seconds before it was destroyed by Cheetah.
Do we know they spent more than 3 minutes writing the script? I'm not certain they did.MuckRaker96 said:
I shouldn't be able to write a better plot in 3 minutes than they did in however many years that took.
Considering Jenkins has already said there are 2 other movies after this one I'm wondering if this going to be Star Wars ST all over again. No overarching story line with each movie being independent and contradicts the former one. I'm not sure how in the hell you even build off of this travesty.AustinAg2K said:Do we know they spent more than 3 minutes writing the script? I'm not certain they did.MuckRaker96 said:
I shouldn't be able to write a better plot in 3 minutes than they did in however many years that took.
Brian Earl Spilner said:AustinAg2K said:
Speaking of the armor, what was so great about it? It lasted all of thirty seconds before it was destroyed by Cheetah.
I really thought that armor would be her lifeline when she still didn't have her powers back. Doesn't it seem like that's what they were setting up?