***** Official Trump 47 Admin Court Battles *****

318,853 Views | 3057 Replies | Last: 5 hrs ago by FTAG 2000
TRM
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 6:40p, 12/25/25
AG
I view this as a good thing. Congress needs to codify it rather than rely on administrative rules.
Reply Quote
1
FatZilla
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 6:46p, 12/25/25
AG
will25u said:

Only seeing this ruling in West Virginia, not the country. Is there another ruling? Seen some posts say the judges spouse is mixed up in the food dye industry? If so, sounds like a clear conflict of interest violation and a requirement for recusal.
Reply Quote
4
1 edit
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FatZilla • 10:35p, 12/25/25
AG
FatZilla said:
will25u said:

Only seeing this ruling in West Virginia, not the country. Is there another ruling? Seen some posts say the judges spouse is mixed up in the food dye industry? If so, sounds like a clear conflict of interest violation and a requirement for recusal.

The judge will just certify a class of people that includes all Americans that eat food.
Reply Quote
1
Rapier108
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:10p, 12/26/25
Obama judge of course.
Reply Quote
5
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:41p, 12/26/25
Reply Quote
7
Hubert J. Farnsworth
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TRM • 9:42p, 12/26/25
TRM said:
I view this as a good thing. Congress needs to codify it rather than rely on administrative rules.


Congress is useless. They aren't going to do anything but try to run out the clock. That includes a good number of worthless republicans as well.
Reply Quote
3
TRM
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Hubert J. Farnsworth • 9:49p, 12/26/25
AG
Unfortunately that's what I think it will take because I foresee several rulings along the lines of Loper Bright saying it's up to the judicial branch to determine Congressional ambiguities in the law.
Reply Quote
richardag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 10:13p, 12/26/25
will25u said:

These people are absolutely insane.
the Democratic Party leadership has thoroughly corrupted the judicial system. Conservatives need to obtain a super majority and begin impeachment of these activist judges. I know this won't happen but it should.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Reply Quote
7
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to richardag • 4:28a, 12/27/25
AG
Note, Judge Anne M. Nardacci was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on November 30, 2022, by a vote of 52-44, in the lame duck session after the election.

This was mostly a party-line vote, with Democrats supporting and most Republicans opposing. (A separate cloture vote to end debate passed 52-45 earlier that day, of course Republicans were too timid/genteel to demand a roll call vote).

But wait, the two exceptions? Susan Collins (of course), and JOHN CORNYN. I hold so much contempt for that sleaze bag. He must be expunged in the primary next year. Anyone voting for him again in that race is out of their mind. He also was the co-sponsor of the HOPE for Afghan SIV's act, which he once bragged about but deleted that post on his social media this month.

Terrible legislation, terrorists in our communities, and horrible judges=John Cornyn specials. /rant. Thanks for listening.
Reply Quote
4
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:19a, 12/27/25
I guarantee you Cornyn is more than happy he cast that vote. He has never shown that he actually opposes illegal immigration.
Reply Quote
4
techno-ag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 9:40a, 12/27/25
AG
will25u said:

The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Reply Quote
6
flown-the-coop
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ellis Wyatt • 11:17a, 12/27/25
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:
I guarantee you Cornyn is more than happy he cast that vote. He has never shown that he actually opposes illegal immigration.

Cornyn is the epitome of an empty suit. Well, it's empty except for whatever he's lined his pockets with.

He's toast. Though none of the R challengers excite me.

Rs won't lose this seat in 2026 but if they turn out empty suits like Cornyn and antagonists like MTG, Randy and Lil Randy, we let the libs sneak back in control.

100% support of Trump agenda or GTFO.
Reply Quote
6
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:46p, 12/27/25
Reply Quote
1
flown-the-coop
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 6:19p, 12/27/25
AG
will25u said:
no more juries from DC. Can be selected from any state. Only fair.
Reply Quote
8
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 8:06p, 12/27/25
AG
will25u said:

Quote:
"As jurors, we have an enormous amount of power to decide whether this administration and its agenda are right or wrong," said Alex Dodds, a Free DC co-founder who attended the session.

Well...not really.

As jurors, you get to decide if the prosecution presented enough evidence to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The administration and its agenda is not part of that decision.

But, I kinda hope a bunch of those activist jurors lie when they state they can be objective. And then get convicted of perjury.

It just might stop that...most of the "activists" would be 110% ****ed if they got sent to prison for a felony. They're used to bleating and throwing tantrums to get their way....
Reply Quote
1
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to flown-the-coop • 8:10p, 12/27/25
AG
flown-the-coop said:
will25u said:

no more juries from DC. Can be selected from any state. Only fair.

I wonder what the actual legal systems says about this...DC isn't a state, so it IS essentially under federal control.

Of course, my view lately has been to force the cession of all parts of DC that are residential/commercial and not federal property to both VA and MD. I know the original reasoning for DC but it's been *******ized over the past 250 years.
Reply Quote
3
flown-the-coop
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ag with kids • 8:19p, 12/27/25
AG
Maybe Ms hawg knows, but it's its own district, no?

But maybe in resolving the slice yellowstone issue we discussed before, then maybe they can fix the problem by adding that to DC and we can staff the area with some intelligent, fair minded jurors.
Reply Quote
1
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:06a, 12/30/25

Reply Quote
9
1 edit
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 7:52a, 12/30/25
AG
It's a fascinating argument that executive branch agencies can't share data amongst themselves. Democrats making this argument, despite always wanting more/bigger government (essentially 'I want a bigger, but also more dysfunctional and compartmentalized one') is one of the greater examples of legal cognitive dissonance I can recall.

I'm impressed the judge took only 7 pages to toss it away though.
Reply Quote
12
flown-the-coop
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:05a, 12/30/25
AG
It's legal cognitive dissonance because it is what is required to perpetuate their fraud and theft on the American taxpayer.

Rs are fairly deep into this as well. We have laws, systems, tools and supposedly a free press that would put an end to this. But when Elon tried to shine even the smudges of light on the fraud, they firebombed his property and tried to destroy his businesses and customers.
Reply Quote
7
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:24a, 12/30/25
Congress abdicates its responsibilities to the Executive.
Republican President uses those powers.
Congress D's outcry.
Lawfare against Executive.
Conservative majority on SCOTUS.

EQUALS... More power to Unitary Executive.

They may be slowing down Trump, but in the end they are getting their arses handed to them at SCOTUS which is codifying the "extra" Executive power.

The executive Power shall be vested in "A" President of the United States of America.
The President "MUST" "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed"
Reply Quote
6
1 edit
techno-ag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 10:13a, 12/30/25
AG
will25u said:


Things are looking up.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Reply Quote
4
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 10:48a, 12/30/25
AG
will25u said:
Congress abdicates its responsibilities to the Executive.
Republican President uses those powers.
Congress D's outcry.
Lawfare against Executive.
Conservative majority on SCOTUS.

EQUALS... More power to Unitary Executive.

They may be slowing down Trump, but in the end they are getting their arses handed to them at SCOTUS which is codifying the "extra" Executive power.

The executive Power shall be vested in "A" President of the United States of America.
The President "MUST" "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed"


I almost think this was expected by the planners who implemented a lot of these policies. And the left fell into their trap.
Reply Quote
4
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 11:02a, 12/30/25
AG
nortex97 said:
It's a fascinating argument that executive branch agencies can't share data amongst themselves. Democrats making this argument, despite always wanting more/bigger government (essentially 'I want a bigger, but also more dysfunctional and compartmentalized one') is one of the greater examples of legal cognitive dissonance I can recall.

I'm impressed the judge took only 7 pages to toss it away though.

The only prohibition I was aware of was the IRS sharing info from tax returns with law enforcement for non tax related crimes. And the reason for that was the compelling nature of having to file tax returns would violate the 5th.
Reply Quote
3
flown-the-coop
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 11:53a, 12/30/25
AG
So in theory I could report my standing on the corner straight slinging rocks sales to the IRS and they cannot turn it over to the FBI / DEA.

But I never trusted they could keep those truly silo-ed.
Reply Quote
1
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to flown-the-coop • 12:01p, 12/30/25
AG
flown-the-coop said:
So in theory I could report my standing on the corner straight slinging rocks sales to the IRS and they cannot turn it over to the FBI / DEA.

But I never trusted they could keep those truly silo-ed.

Yes. Go back further and Al Capone. Had he paid taxes on his illegally earned income, he could not be prosecuted for it. Underreporting of income versus maintaining a more lavish lifestyle gets investigated as tax evasion, not illegal gambling or dealing drugs or other illegal conduct.

Also think how hard it is to bring down Mafia members. If their tax info was freely shared, would be a lot easier for law enforcement to connect the dots.

But because of the compulsion present to file tax returns, that is viewed as a 5th amendment issue and cannot be used for non tax related crimes. Please note non tax related crimes.
Reply Quote
3
flown-the-coop
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 12:06p, 12/30/25
AG
Thanks Hawg. Still hard to trust that if you freely disclosed illegal activities in your tax returns that you would go "unnoticed". As with Trump, even the IRS illegally sharing can get you messed up.

I think I'll just report it as farming income and related merchandising.
Reply Quote
1
techno-ag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 12:09p, 12/30/25
AG
Good thing these aren't citizens, then.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Reply Quote
1
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to techno-ag • 12:12p, 12/30/25
AG
techno-ag said:
Good thing these aren't citizens, then.

That's not the IRS. They have different rules.

No one is forced to apply for assistance from Medicaid. That's the difference. When financial information is supplied as part of the application process, not a 5th A issue as it is voluntary.
Reply Quote
4
flown-the-coop
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 12:17p, 12/30/25
AG
That's a good point of distinction on voluntary versus compulsory self reporting. Trying to think of any other compulsory self reporting that occurs at the federal level.
Reply Quote
1
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to flown-the-coop • 3:36p, 12/30/25
AG
flown-the-coop said:
That's a good point of distinction on voluntary versus compulsory self reporting. Trying to think of any other compulsory self reporting that occurs at the federal level.

Selective Service...

Of course, because of the misogyny and patriarchy of America, it only applies to women.

This is to FORCE the women from being included.

Proving yet again, that MEN are the problem.
You can turn off signatures, btw
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to flown-the-coop • 3:41p, 12/30/25
AG
flown-the-coop said:
That's a good point of distinction on voluntary versus compulsory self reporting. Trying to think of any other compulsory self reporting that occurs at the federal level.

Depends. If one is talking about running for office? Disclosures under campaign finance laws. Want to charge a foreign client for lobbying services in the US? FARA registration. Want to be a plain ol' lobbyist on K-Street? register. Those are all voluntary endeavors. But income taxes are universal and compulsory.
Reply Quote
2
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to flown-the-coop • 3:53p, 12/30/25
AG
flown-the-coop said:
Thanks Hawg. Still hard to trust that if you freely disclosed illegal activities in your tax returns that you would go "unnoticed". As with Trump, even the IRS illegally sharing can get you messed up.

I think I'll just report it as farming income and related merchandising.

You don't write "cocaine sales" under "Miscellaneous Income" on your tax form.

It is under dividends from LLCs or Sub-S Corps and the like. Although back in the 80s the use of miscellaneous income was common. First husband was a tax attorney with some...shall we say...questionable clients. he would not sign their tax returns as the preparer unless they fully disclosed everything, legal and illegal.

Also back in the 80s the bank regulations were much looser on reporting money laundering, not that banks couldn't do so they were just not compelled to do so. Now there are things like SARs that require reporting. But again, voluntary activity to conduct banking business with a financial institution.

Sure the rules have tightened up since then fostering the use of shell companies and the like but the principle remains the same.

Now that is not the same as saying that a referral for tax related crimes cannot lead to other criminal activity as it frequently can and does but a referral from the IRS on just a non-tax related won't fly very far.
Reply Quote
2
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:51a, 12/31/25
AG

He would never do that.
Coming soon:

Maybe should be on the MN Somali daycare thread, but it does involve US DoJ cases so I dunno.
Reply Quote
5
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:58p, 12/31/25
Reply Quote
6
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.