***Iran [Military Action Thread]***[See Staff Note in OP]

426,479 Views | 2439 Replies | Last: 2 sec ago by Fitch
The Fall Guy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Science Denier said:

Who?mikejones! said:



At this point, do other countries attacking Iran actually help? Seems like piling on a carcass to get brownie points.


Let them do it
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

From the article:
Quote:

Israeli and US strikes hit the building of a body tasked with electing Iran's new supreme leader, local media reports.
"The American-Zionist criminals attacked the Assembly of Experts building in Qom," south of Tehran, says the Tasnim news agency.
Local media shows footage of the building severely damaged in the strikes. Iran's supreme leader ayatollah Ali Khamenei was killed in US and Israeli strikes on Saturday.

LOL. Mossad is so far up in their junk, even know what they are thinking. I wouldn't be surprised at this point if they did not know which of these guys have polyps in their colons that need to be checked out.


there are now cases of Mossad operatives (not agents) being put into positions who do not even know who the other Mossad operatives working alongside them are!

the intel that the IDF has on what is going on is unreal- to hit individual buildings in a city of 10 million people.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Fall Guy said:

Science Denier said:

Who?mikejones! said:



At this point, do other countries attacking Iran actually help? Seems like piling on a carcass to get brownie points.


Let them do it


and it actually DOES help in the real world not just propaganda

Iran is twice the size of Texas, there are a lot of places to hide ballistic missiles and launchers

you need to have constant fighter bomber sweeps over a massive territory to be on station right when the launchers drive out of their tunnel hideouts.
jamey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bonfarr said:

jamey said:

bonfarr said:

Not for taking out ballistic missiles but for drone defense it matters.


The APKWS does not appear to be for drone defense. Its just a cheap missile used against lightly armored targets



No here is a Houthi drone shot down with one of these missiles.



https://www.twz.com/air/laser-guided-rockets-now-primary-anti-drone-weapon-for-usaf-jets-in-middle-east



So they took a air to surface use missile and are trying to use it against drones with multiple and scores of hits. Sounds very beta
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Who?mikejones! said:

I think Trump was basically broadcasting to the Iranian people to be ready to take over and made a calculation that if we degrade the iran govt to a certain degree, we wouldnt need to worry about the regime change part of this

The differences between Iran and Iraq/Afghanistan is Iran had a singular identity before. They were a Persian state, unlike a group of disparate tribes and identities in Iraq/Afghanistan. Much easier in the aftermath as they won't be trying to cobble together a coalition.

Having said that, the goals for Iran are pretty simple: no nukes, cut ballistic missiles severely, no more proxies in funding nor support and inspections allowed to verify these.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

More job openings in Tehran.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Fall Guy said:

Science Denier said:

Who?mikejones! said:



At this point, do other countries attacking Iran actually help? Seems like piling on a carcass to get brownie points.


Let them do it


Agreed. Iranian government is a dead horse that i have no proven seeing beaten.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
The Collective
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Fall Guy said:

Science Denier said:

Who?mikejones! said:



At this point, do other countries attacking Iran actually help? Seems like piling on a carcass to get brownie points.


Let them do it


The bigger point is them joining and attacking vs. calling for peace in the area to stop them from being attacked. Politically, the former is huge in my mind.
bonfarr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It looks like we are engaging Kurdish Separatist Militias and encouraging them to join the fight against the IRGC which they have been fighting for a long time. They are armed and have experience but if there is a regime change I am not sure how it all plays out. Most Iranians are wary of the Kurds because they want to keep fighting until they have an autonomous territory for all of their people scattered across the ME and there is recent friction between Kurdish leadership and Reza Pahlavi. If they join the fight in a big way and there is regime change what are they going to demand? They aren't just going to skulk back across the border into Iraq.
Sims
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Who?mikejones! said:

I think Trump was basically broadcasting to the Iranian people to be ready to take over and made a calculation that if we degrade the iran govt to a certain degree, we wouldnt need to worry about the regime change part of this

The differences between Iran and Iraq/Afghanistan is Iran had a singular identity before. They were a Persian state, unlike a group of disparate tribes and identities in Iraq/Afghanistan. Much easier in the aftermath as they won't be trying to cobble together a coalition.

Having said that, the goals for Iran are pretty simple: no nukes, cut ballistic missiles severely, no more proxies in funding nor support and inspections allowed to verify these.

I'd be willing to bet the biggest impediment(s) to an ascendant Persian state is Israel and the Emirates. They want destabilization in the larger countries to undermine their ability to project power outside of their own countries. They don't want chaos, but they also don't want self-supported powers in the region to overshadow them.
Fitch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guy on the ground in Israel

jagsdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Holeee crap, that B 52 is a huge beast! Plus rotating cruise missiles as well as , I suppose a pay load of whatever bombs? Christ. You know I've tried keeping up with this on the news, but I keep coming back to this thread. Just more information, more up to date. You guys are doing yeoman work, I tell you!
bonfarr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jamey said:

YouBet said:

jamey said:

ttu_85 said:

jamey said:

OldArmy71 said:

I cannot conceive of the resources Iran must have used to build so many missiles and drones. It really is staggering.


The drones are like $20K, really cheap. A PAC3 missile is in the millions

Yep bad math. very bad math. We need some new math- or to be more accurate bring back good math. Time to put American innovation to the test. Hunter killer drones, giant tracked multi barreled shot gunesk weapons for low flying drone swarms, Jammers, EMP, microwav emitters. Get creative America. Call the sci-fi writers and get ideas.

What a fun job that would be. The hard part would be getting the cheap components in mass we no longer build and putting together the fabrication we no longer have.



We've been watching the drone war in Ukraine developing for years. Id hope we're ahead of the curve but it doesnt seem like it


Makes sense though. Ongoing action in a theater of war requires you to adapt and improve on the fly, constantly. Good thing here is that we can leapfrog the tech several generations at once.


Its a very slow process though thats encumbered by government oversight requirements.

Perhaps someone like Anduril who bypasses much of the process by developing weapons on their own dime has a foot in the door
The news cycle is so fast I'm not surprised if this has been overlooked, but our new LUCAS drone system, which made its debut on Saturday, is literally a reengineered copy of Iran's Shahed drone that uses mesh networks with Starshield so that all of the LUCAS drones can communicate with each other on targeting and surveillance. The original Shahed drone is basically the equivalent of a German V1; it follows GPS coordinates to the target, and that's it. Our version is a smart weapon system that is cheaper to produce and more effective in every way. So yes, we have already leapfrogged drone tech and we're ahead of the curve right now.
Silvertaps
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Israel intelligence is on point with knowing the location of EVERY person that matters politically in Iran every second of a day. Impressive!
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


The Fall Guy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/airstrikes-hit-mehrabad-airport-in-tehran-iranian-reports/

Israel hit the Mehrabad airport in Tehran
sts7049
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
benchmark said:

Opening Hormuz is important to everyone ... but particularly to China. About 40% of China's total oil imports pass through Hormuz. But we're also waching a high stakes chess game. China calls "check" with their rare-earth policy ... the US calls "check" with a potentially new Venezuela/Iran policy.

this keeps coming up. hormuz is open, but shippers' insurance rates is another matter. depends on who is willing to take that kind of risk.
halfastros81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This latest strike sends a very powerful message to the clerics and the IRGC imo. "Your'e done" is the message.
BBRex
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:




Having a stronger alliance with the Gulf States and controlling Venezuelan oil output would be huge. Especially with a U.S. friendly regime in Iran.


(Side note: While a war on Reuters might not be a bad idea, I don't think that's what they meant. Hyphens join, so no space. Dashed divide, so add spaces around. Personal pet peeve I can't let slide.)
jagsdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Think my grandson is probably on one of those.
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jagsdad said:

Think my grandson is probably on one of those.

Godspeed to him and his fellow servicemen
Old May Banker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Think my grandson is probably on one of those.

May God bless him and keep him safe from harm.
Gaeilge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
China is going to have to self-insure the oil going through the Hormuz, which I don't think will be an issue for them. But marine traffic through the Hormuz will slow dramatically more until the war risk coverage is extended back to the area.
FrozenInYesterday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Serious question. What is the negative side to flying C-130's/Bomber's over the country and randomly dropping crates of AK's and ammos indiscriminately across the nation in the hopes that some of them get into the hands of protestors that use them against IRGC. Have yet to understand why we don't do this. Would it encourage crime that could be seen as negative on the global stage? I honestly think this may be the most helpful thing we could do right now to help push our intended goals.
The Fall Guy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/turkey-says-making-intense-efforts-to-end-mideast-war/

Screw Turkey. Plus China is now chiming in to stop the war
MagnumLoad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FrozenInYesterday said:

Serious question. What is the negative side to flying C-130's/Bomber's over the country and randomly dropping crates of AK's and ammos indiscriminately across the nation in the hopes that some of them get into the hands of protestors that use them against IRGC. Have yet to understand why we don't do this. Would it encourage crime that could be seen as negative on the global stage? I honestly think this may be the most helpful thing we could do right now to help push our intended goals.

Agree, but it can't be randomly. Must be planned.
agsalaska
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
halfastros81 said:

This latest strike sends a very powerful message to the clerics and the IRGC imo. "Your'e done" is the message.

Yea I don't know how they can function at all now. They can't even move without getting attacked. And they get attacked when standing still.

deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jamey said:

bonfarr said:

jamey said:

bonfarr said:

Not for taking out ballistic missiles but for drone defense it matters.


The APKWS does not appear to be for drone defense. Its just a cheap missile used against lightly armored targets



No here is a Houthi drone shot down with one of these missiles.



https://www.twz.com/air/laser-guided-rockets-now-primary-anti-drone-weapon-for-usaf-jets-in-middle-east



So they took an air to surface use missile and are trying to use it against drones with multiple and scores of hits. Sounds very beta


They took an unguided rocket. And added guidance to it. It's an innovative solution.
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FrozenInYesterday said:

Serious question. What is the negative side to flying C-130's/Bomber's over the country and randomly dropping crates of AK's and ammos indiscriminately across the nation in the hopes that some of them get into the hands of protestors that use them against IRGC. Have yet to understand why we don't do this. Would it encourage crime that could be seen as negative on the global stage? I honestly think this may be the most helpful thing we could do right now to help push our intended goals.
Well, a possible negative is having the IRGC militias picking them up and using them on the protesters. Hoping the guns get into the right hands is a pretty terrible idea.
Sundance86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
With all the planning that has gone into this, one would assume the agents would have pre positioned caches of these in Iran in advance with plans of who to distribute to
FrozenInYesterday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The IRGC already have guns so it's not like giving them more AK's will move the needle in their favor in my opinion. Drop them randomly in cities and across the desert. if we drop 10,000 guns at random and 5% - 10% get into the hands of people that want to use them against the regime I would imagine it as a net positive. The only negative I see is the IRGC deciding to kill site unseen any citizen that they think may grab one and the U.S. being blamed for their citizens being indiscriminately killed
92AG10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
deddog said:

jamey said:

bonfarr said:

jamey said:

bonfarr said:

Not for taking out ballistic missiles but for drone defense it matters.


The APKWS does not appear to be for drone defense. Its just a cheap missile used against lightly armored targets



No here is a Houthi drone shot down with one of these missiles.



https://www.twz.com/air/laser-guided-rockets-now-primary-anti-drone-weapon-for-usaf-jets-in-middle-east



So they took an air to surface use missile and are trying to use it against drones with multiple and scores of hits. Sounds very beta


They took an unguided rocket. And added guidance to it. It's an innovative solution.


APKWS isn't new technology.
jamey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
92AG10 said:

deddog said:

jamey said:

bonfarr said:

jamey said:

bonfarr said:

Not for taking out ballistic missiles but for drone defense it matters.


The APKWS does not appear to be for drone defense. Its just a cheap missile used against lightly armored targets



No here is a Houthi drone shot down with one of these missiles.



https://www.twz.com/air/laser-guided-rockets-now-primary-anti-drone-weapon-for-usaf-jets-in-middle-east



So they took an air to surface use missile and are trying to use it against drones with multiple and scores of hits. Sounds very beta


They took an unguided rocket. And added guidance to it. It's an innovative solution.


APKWS isn't new technology.


Yeah, it does not appear new, other than its being used air to air instead of air to surface.

I would think the requirement to have a plane in the area is limiting, unlike surface to air methods that are always on guard duty
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.