flown-the-coop said:
Tea Party guys had to tone it way down which reflects the majority of the conservatives DO NOT lean towards Tea Party ideals and certainly not libertarian.
Being a conservative with Tea Party or libertarian leanings means they are conservative first and lean towards Tea Party or libertarian at times. Which is a significant majority of conservatives (note conservative <> republican). Not the other way around like it sounds like you are misinterpretting it. And the Tea Party guys did not last because the current system is team v team and the two teams will not allow a third team to take over. More importantly there are voters that enable the team v team system, cough cough ; ) .
Quote:
I respect your position on Tea Party (not simply in your username but in your posting), I simply don't agree with it.
I know and that's ok. I interpret your position as team over policy because you still have faith in the GOP and RINO's within. I don't fault you there but think it's naive, but I can respect it because I think we both at least want similar outcomes but disagree on how to achieve them. That's just good politics.
Quote:
My issue with Massie are his antics and actions. Period. He was elected as a Republican, campaigned as a Republican, used the money and network of Republicans, then gets to DC and works to undermine the agenda of his Republican leaders by antagonizing, undermining
Well that's a two way street so once again, your gripe is solely directed at Massie when the R's campaigned on one thing and then don't follow through. Massie calling them out on that could be viewed as undermining the the team, but again we shouldn't be supporting a team v team system when "our team" isn't even following through with what they campaigned on.
Quote:
and siding with the enemy.
Massie does not side with the D's, but rather votes for a policy that him and his constituents believe in, for the most part. The D's want to move left with big gov. Massie wants to move right with small gov. If the GOP wants to move right with big gov, Massie and the D's may not want to go along with that but that does not mean Massie is siding with the D's.
The only way one can make that assumption is if they view politics as team A vs team B AND want to keep politics that way rather than fix it. Again, not poking fun at you since I think our end goal beliefs have significant overlap, but we just disagree on how to get there.
Learn about the Texas Nationalist Movement
https://tnm.me