Just pointing out the hypocrisy that if you want a team first type of politician, then Massie obviously wouldn't be your guy. But I understand your point of view from that perspective and respect it, though question whether conservativism is the best label for what you are advocating for.
To say he's an obstructionist and not principled is about as far from the truth of his intentions as could be and makes your argument weak.
Had you acknowledged that team over policy is the goal for the time period, then yes I would agree he's clearly being an obstructionist in that regard. And I absolutely agree that not letting Marxists take control of our gov would be a very high priority but not at the expense of conservativism. Sounds like we agree on the end goal for the most part, but differ on how to get there! That's what politics should be like if the D's would quit being so anti-American.
To say he's an obstructionist and not principled is about as far from the truth of his intentions as could be and makes your argument weak.
Had you acknowledged that team over policy is the goal for the time period, then yes I would agree he's clearly being an obstructionist in that regard. And I absolutely agree that not letting Marxists take control of our gov would be a very high priority but not at the expense of conservativism. Sounds like we agree on the end goal for the most part, but differ on how to get there! That's what politics should be like if the D's would quit being so anti-American.
Learn about the Texas Nationalist Movement
https://tnm.me
https://tnm.me