Nixon is underrated so,. Id vote for him over both Paxton and talarico
Paxton vs Talarico
170,327 Views |
1816 Replies |
Last: 4 min ago by ArbAg
Dan Carlin said:
Oh look, the GOP talking points are about nonsensical social issues which coincidentally ignore the atrocious behavior of their own candidate. Same old shtick since the 1980s
Wonder if Texans will fall for the sleight of hand and continue to vote for corruption
Talarico's social issues and his policy stances make him a poor choice for senate. Just awful at both.
Who?mikejones! said:
Nixon is underrated so,. Id vote for him over both Paxton and talarico
I'm a couple scotches in but Tricky Dick was the man. He didn't need any dirty tricks to beat McGovern. He was a paranoid politician that got really bad advice.
You're from down South,
And when you open your mouth,
You always seem to put your foot there.
And when you open your mouth,
You always seem to put your foot there.
You might be an America-hating communist troll when you post about you've been a conservative republican your whole life but now you cannot accept Paxton and need telaricco in the US Senate for six years.
I hope you meant that sarcastically!
And I'd Dems get majority we are in deep doodoo!
If Dems
It's a choice between a guy that makes mistakes and a guy who wants men in women's sports and thinks it's okay to cut off children's body parts. If you cans vote for a false preacher and the above mentioned, then you are sadly struggling with your belief system. I pray you will think about how dangerous Tallerico is to our society as a whole.
K2-HMFIC said:txags92 said:K2-HMFIC said:Who?mikejones! said:K2-HMFIC said:Who?mikejones! said:
Sure. You could abstain. Then you for sure will get what you absolutely don't want.
Again, you've got 2 choices and one is clearly, by a long amount, more likely to produce the results I want. The other is 1000% likely to produce the results i don't want.
So, abstain all you want. Its stupid and self defeating. If you want tceh to ruin your day twice, go for it
Better to abstain, wait six years to get the right person in office than elect Paxton and have him in office in perpetuity.
That's what the primary was for. Paxton won and now is your choice if you prefer anl candidate more oriented towards the right.
It's that or real disaster
Given the nature of party primaries its difficult to get someone out once they get in.
I mean the success rate is atrocious.
We are better of losing...and making up for it now than have the stain of Ken Paxton perpetually hanging over us.
You keep saying "we". Are you talking about the democrats? Because sure, voting in Talarico is surely better for them. There is no planet on which 6 years of Talarico in the senate representing Texas is better for the Rs.
I'll take 6 years of Talarico over 24 of Ken Paxton.
We know. You'd take Talerico over Cornyn or any other GOP candidate too.
That is just wrong!
Dan Carlin said:
Oh look, the GOP talking points are about nonsensical social issues which coincidentally ignore the atrocious behavior of their own candidate. Same old shtick since the 1980s
Wonder if Texans will fall for the sleight of hand and continue to vote for corruption
Numerous posters have told you reasons like federal bench appointments, 2nd amendment support, and blocking progressive legislation are reason for Paxton.
Why ignore them just to troll?
oh no said:
You might be an America-hating communist troll when you post about you've been a conservative republican your whole life but now you cannot accept Paxton and need telaricco in the US Senate for six years.
That poster is full of ***** He's not a conservative or a republican and his post history shows that.
I mean it's just wrong to vote Talarico!
Hating the One True God of the Bible isn't a social issue. It's eternal life versus eternal death.Dan Carlin said:
Oh look, the GOP talking points are about nonsensical social issues which coincidentally ignore the atrocious behavior of their own candidate. Same old shtick since the 1980s
Wonder if Texans will fall for the sleight of hand and continue to vote for corruption
"We need a communist freak show because Paxton wrote a letter" almost gave it away
oh no said:
You might be an America-hating communist troll when you post about you've been a conservative republican your whole life but now you cannot accept Paxton and need telaricco in the US Senate for six years.
You can't get much more concerned as a concerned moderate than that!
Apparently the SEC and another conference are saying they won't play Texas Tech either.
Whoop2 said:
Apparently the SEC and another conference are saying they won't play Texas Tech either.
They have individual contracts that may or may not havr buyouts/LS's. Conferences don't have that within league play. Conference owns the rights of their members.
LOL OLD
Who?mikejones! said:K2-HMFIC said:DG-Ag said:K2-HMFIC said:txags92 said:K2-HMFIC said:Who?mikejones! said:K2-HMFIC said:Who?mikejones! said:
Sure. You could abstain. Then you for sure will get what you absolutely don't want.
Again, you've got 2 choices and one is clearly, by a long amount, more likely to produce the results I want. The other is 1000% likely to produce the results i don't want.
So, abstain all you want. Its stupid and self defeating. If you want tceh to ruin your day twice, go for it
Better to abstain, wait six years to get the right person in office than elect Paxton and have him in office in perpetuity.
That's what the primary was for. Paxton won and now is your choice if you prefer anl candidate more oriented towards the right.
It's that or real disaster
Given the nature of party primaries its difficult to get someone out once they get in.
I mean the success rate is atrocious.
We are better of losing...and making up for it now than have the stain of Ken Paxton perpetually hanging over us.
You keep saying "we". Are you talking about the democrats? Because sure, voting in Talarico is surely better for them. There is no planet on which 6 years of Talarico in the senate representing Texas is better for the Rs.
I'll take 6 years of Talarico over 24 of Ken Paxton.
Good luck with that, comrade!
Folks aren't focused enough on the long game…we need to get the Republican Party right, and if we tolerate corruption, then we will become that.
Can't play the logn game if you don't play the short game. Talarico in the modern senate that is so likely to be a majority by only a couple votes either way would be both a short and long game disaster.
Nothing screams 'playing the long game' like voting for a freakshow and possibly ****ing up the opportunity to replace a couple of Supreme Court justices before Trump's term is over.
Truly a visionary
DonHenley said:
Red year wave based on what? Increasing inflation, higher prices, and directionless war in Iran?
People frustrated with libdems
“…What?”
- Joe Biden
- Joe Biden
DG-Ag said:Who?mikejones! said:
Nixon is underrated so,. Id vote for him over both Paxton and talarico
I'm a couple scotches in but Tricky Dick was the man. He didn't need any dirty tricks to beat McGovern. He was a paranoid politician that got really bad advice.
It's not paranoia if they really are out to get you...
Ellis Wyatt said:Hating the One True God of the Bible isn't a social issue. It's eternal life versus eternal death.Dan Carlin said:
Oh look, the GOP talking points are about nonsensical social issues which coincidentally ignore the atrocious behavior of their own candidate. Same old shtick since the 1980s
Wonder if Texans will fall for the sleight of hand and continue to vote for corruption
Whoop2 said:
It's a choice between a guy that makes mistakes and a guy who wants men in women's sports and thinks it's okay to cut off children's body parts. If you cans vote for a false preacher and the above mentioned, then you are sadly struggling with your belief system. I pray you will think about how dangerous Tallerico is to our society as a whole.
If only it was as easy to get a hall pass from the missus as it is for evangelicals to give to Paxton.
Dan Carlin said:Whoop2 said:
It's a choice between a guy that makes mistakes and a guy who wants men in women's sports and thinks it's okay to cut off children's body parts. If you cans vote for a false preacher and the above mentioned, then you are sadly struggling with your belief system. I pray you will think about how dangerous Tallerico is to our society as a whole.
If only it was as easy to get a hall pass from the missus as it is for evangelicals to give to Paxton.
K
Dan Carlin said:Whoop2 said:
It's a choice between a guy that makes mistakes and a guy who wants men in women's sports and thinks it's okay to cut off children's body parts. If you cans vote for a false preacher and the above mentioned, then you are sadly struggling with your belief system. I pray you will think about how dangerous Tallerico is to our society as a whole.
If only it was as easy to get a hall pass from the missus as it is for evangelicals to give to Paxton.
Who gave him a pass? We don't care enough to give him a pass, that's what you don't get
Libs have to make every contest about anything other than policy because they know their policy positions suck. It's really that simple.
yep. it's all deflection.Prosperdick said:
Libs have to make every contest about anything other than policy because they know their policy positions suck. It's really that simple.
This guy had a mistress at the end of his failed marriage and he wrote a letter to the big 12!! Therefore, you can't vote for him. How about tell us why we should vote for the other guy or abstain and help the other guy? Tell us why open borders and mass unfettered migration are good for us? How about tell us why our taxes aren't high enough yet and what our "fair share" is? Tell us how nationalized healthcare for all the lazy, addicted, and obese is good for me? Tell us what gives you confidence that a big benevolent government will be able to solve every problem for everyone and how socialism will work this time? Explain how defunding police and reimagining policing is going to lead to less crime. Explain how lowering standards based on superficial characteristics like skin pigment to force equity of outcome isn't going to lower quality? How are all these communist equity program going to help us? Why are transing kids, drag shows for kids, dudes in women's sports, dudes in the ladies room good things?
Just defend yours and telrico's positions. Sell us. Persuade us.
They can't. His stances are so bad they only deflect.
They never defend Talarico, they just go after Paxton.
They never defend Talarico, they just go after Paxton.
"Well, doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?" "A republic, if you can keep it" - Benjamin Franklin
Their candidate believes in mutilating children and allowing men to dominate all sports a forcing your daughters to look at *****es at school, but somehow Paxton having an affair is the line.Prosperdick said:
Libs have to make every contest about anything other than policy because they know their policy positions suck. It's really that simple.
Of course they also believe in forcing girls to be exposed to male predators. This is what godless degeneracy looks like.
I did see recently the freak came out (no pun intended) against Biden's open border policy. Interesting they can't find any clips of him criticizing Joe at the time only of him talking about a big ol' WELCOME MAT at the southern border.
I'm sure if a Dem becomes POTUS in '28 and runs on open borders he will certainly stick by his new found conservative principles.
I'm sure if a Dem becomes POTUS in '28 and runs on open borders he will certainly stick by his new found conservative principles.
If the Marxists gain control of US senate and retake the house they will refocus on obtaining "path to amnesty" that they always talk about. They probably already have enough free loading future socialist voters after they said F your safety and let in about 20 million more unvetted in four short years to add to the approx 20 million that were already here. Trump will only deport a fraction of what they let in and they know it. This country will permanently vote itself into socialism that it can never vote itself out of. Using poors to destroy ourselves for the benefit of only the elites and the bureaucrats and socialist politicians is how socialism works. These people pushing for this won't explain why it's a good thing. Only try to convince you that you should be appalled that Paxton had a mistress. It's full Orwellian "party over everything" for them too. Or you could say blu no matter who. Look at Jewish socialist Bernie supporting Nazi socialist Planter. Fing nuts.
Dan Carlin said:Whoop2 said:
It's a choice between a guy that makes mistakes and a guy who wants men in women's sports and thinks it's okay to cut off children's body parts. If you cans vote for a false preacher and the above mentioned, then you are sadly struggling with your belief system. I pray you will think about how dangerous Tallerico is to our society as a whole.
If only it was as easy to get a hall pass from the missus as it is for evangelicals to give to Paxton.
Democrats preaching morals to anyone is comical. It's like an atheist tell Catholics Pope Benedict is a bad guy.
it's worse than thatAlexNguyen said:Dan Carlin said:Whoop2 said:
It's a choice between a guy that makes mistakes and a guy who wants men in women's sports and thinks it's okay to cut off children's body parts. If you cans vote for a false preacher and the above mentioned, then you are sadly struggling with your belief system. I pray you will think about how dangerous Tallerico is to our society as a whole.
If only it was as easy to get a hall pass from the missus as it is for evangelicals to give to Paxton.
Democrats preaching morals to anyone is comical. It's like an atheist tell Catholics Pope Benedict is a bad guy.
I'll be voting for Paxton. But nominating him was a mistake, Cornyn would have waxed him, now this is probably going to be close.
And not only that, I'm a sinner so I can say that even though I'm forgiven, I'm no better than Paxton but as a Christian I can't support a false preacher who said the thing he thinks about after his family is trans kids. What the heck!
Featured Stories
See All
16:53
4h ago
3.0k
27:10
1d ago
4.0k
Aggies are building star-studded depth at receiver
by Olin Buchanan
16:57
5h ago
2.0k
2026 MLB Draft projections with analyst Joe Doyle
by David Nuño
DeepETX_Aggie
"A&M Biggest Spender of '27 Recruiting Cycle" per On3
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
56