if we're gonna let the "talarico is a secret gay pedophile" thing continue based on vibes, then in the interest of being fair and balanced paxton gives the vibe of someone hiding a trans porn addiction he's deeply ashamed of.
Paxton vs Talarico
178,191 Views |
1936 Replies |
Last: 4 hrs ago by samurai_science
Aggie Dad Sip said:Cinco Ranch Aggie said:
Don't matter any more at all? I mean, I can see that viewpoint if you just awoke from a coma that started a century ago. Did you ever hear the name Bill Clinton getting blowjobs in the Oval Office? JFK bringing in women not named Jackie to bang?
Ok, so we agree that character and integrity are quaint old fashioned ideals that have no place in American politics. So why bring someone's morals into the equation at all?
In 2026 if a candidate supports a voter's political positions he could be a devil worshipping trans cannibal with swastikas for hands and they'd joyfully skip to the polls to cast their vote for him/her.
Are you talking about that democrat from Maine?
Old McDonald said:
if we're gonna let the "talarico is a secret gay pedophile" thing continue based on vibes, then in the interest of being fair and balanced paxton gives the vibe of someone hiding a trans porn addiction he's deeply ashamed of.
Neither are what I would consider high moral human beings. Nevertheless it won't matter come November. Paxton will win by at least 5-7 points because the Democrats picked the one person who will still lose in what could have been a winnable race for the first time in awhile
Old McDonald said:
if we're gonna let the "talarico is a secret gay pedophile" thing continue based on vibes, then in the interest of being fair and balanced paxton gives the vibe of someone hiding a trans porn addiction he's deeply ashamed of.
You're just projecting your own personal perversions
if it's between a gay pedo vs a trans porn guy, one could argue the pedo is an actual criminal and much worse if he does anything to kids, but if you're cool with it, how about just decide between communist and not communist?Old McDonald said:
if we're gonna let the "talarico is a secret gay pedophile" thing continue based on vibes, then in the interest of being fair and balanced paxton gives the vibe of someone hiding a trans porn addiction he's deeply ashamed of.
Sq4fish83 said:Old McDonald said:
if we're gonna let the "talarico is a secret gay pedophile" thing continue based on vibes, then in the interest of being fair and balanced paxton gives the vibe of someone hiding a trans porn addiction he's deeply ashamed of.
You're justprojecting your own personal perversionsmaking **** up
FIFY!
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
oh no said:seminarian "man of the cloth" preaches from his pulpit to idiots who want to hear they can make babies and then crush their babies' skulls and rip their babies' limbs off because it's in the bible since the Angel Gabriel told Mary she could abort Jesus if she wanted to. **** like that hits a lot harder than "Paxton has a girlfriend". Sin is a sin is a sin all the same to you, but those are not the same to me.Aggie Dad Sip said:
Although there's no evidence at all to support it, let's say that James Talarico is gay and he's lying about his religion. So what? Is that any worse than being an amoral corruption machine like Ken Paxton?
If you wanna support Paxton because he supports your political positions, knock yourselves out. But sin is sin is sin is sin. None worse than another. The hand wringing around here about Talarico's morality or lack thereof is really silly.
Add the psycho's actual America-hating communist policy beliefs and the creepy phony is downright scary. Paxton's sin of having a girlfriend and going on vacation drops a little bit further down the list of **** to care about.
I honestly believe you think every word of your post is true. I respect your right to your opinion, but I also have the right to dismiss it as convoluted nonsense.
Ok maybe we need to reset this thread.
I support pretty much every policy position that Paxton does. He was not who I wanted to see on the ballot but here we are.
I also put voting against the commie dem party as the primary reason I even vote and it's not even close.
That said, could Sip Dad or Old McDonald post why they support policy positions of Talarico and if they will be voting for him Nov?
Let's get back to policy and explain why you support a guy that wants an open border, legalized genital mutilation of minors, and is generally a communist.
I support pretty much every policy position that Paxton does. He was not who I wanted to see on the ballot but here we are.
I also put voting against the commie dem party as the primary reason I even vote and it's not even close.
That said, could Sip Dad or Old McDonald post why they support policy positions of Talarico and if they will be voting for him Nov?
Let's get back to policy and explain why you support a guy that wants an open border, legalized genital mutilation of minors, and is generally a communist.
kill your babies! It's in the bible! This "priest" says so!Aggie Dad Sip said:oh no said:seminarian "man of the cloth" preaches from his pulpit to idiots who want to hear they can make babies and then crush their babies' skulls and rip their babies' limbs off because it's in the bible since the Angel Gabriel told Mary she could abort Jesus if she wanted to. **** like that hits a lot harder than "Paxton has a girlfriend". Sin is a sin is a sin all the same to you, but those are not the same to me.Aggie Dad Sip said:
Although there's no evidence at all to support it, let's say that James Talarico is gay and he's lying about his religion. So what? Is that any worse than being an amoral corruption machine like Ken Paxton?
If you wanna support Paxton because he supports your political positions, knock yourselves out. But sin is sin is sin is sin. None worse than another. The hand wringing around here about Talarico's morality or lack thereof is really silly.
Add the psycho's actual America-hating communist policy beliefs and the creepy phony is downright scary. Paxton's sin of having a girlfriend and going on vacation drops a little bit further down the list of **** to care about.
I honestly believe you think every word of your post is true. I respect your right to your opinion, but I also have the right to dismiss it as convoluted nonsense.
James Talarico (D), the TX candidate for U.S. Senate, misrepresents Mary's biblical virgin birth to JUSTIFY the m*rder of unborn babies.
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) March 4, 2026
"I say this in the context of abortion... The Angel comes down and asks Mary if this is something she wants to do."pic.twitter.com/BEuqJs6AIF
Aggie Dad Sip said:
Although there's no evidence at all to support it, let's say that James Talarico is gay and he's lying about his religion. So what? Is that any worse than being an amoral corruption machine like Ken Paxton?
If you wanna support Paxton because he supports your political positions, knock yourselves out. But sin is sin is sin is sin. None worse than another. The hand wringing around here about Talarico's morality or lack thereof is really silly.
He's not lying about his religion.
He's putting it front and center.
You can turn off signatures, btw
Aggie Dad Sip said:oh no said:Aggie Dad Sip said:
Although there's no evidence at all to support it, let's say that James Talarico is gay and he's lying about his religion. So what? Is that any worse than being an amoral corruption machine like Ken Paxton?
If you wanna support Paxton because he supports your political positions, knock yourselves out. But sin is sin is sin is sin. None worse than another. The hand wringing around here about Talarico's morality or lack thereof is really silly.
seminarian "man of the cloth" preaches from his pulpit to idiots who want to hear they can make babies and then crush their babies' skulls and rip their babies' limbs off because it's in the bible since the Angel Gabriel told Mary she could abort Jesus if she wanted to. **** like that hits a lot harder than "Paxton has a girlfriend". Sin is a sin is a sin all the same to you, but those are not the same to me.
Add the psycho's actual America-hating communist policy beliefs and the creepy phony is downright scary. Paxton's sin of having a girlfriend and going on vacation drops a little bit further down the list of **** to care about.
I honestly believe you think every word of your post is true. I respect your right to your opinion, but I also have the right to dismiss it as convoluted nonsense.
Talarico just makes sh** up and dumbass white liberals lap it up. His initial appeal was to white libs who were raised in the church and hold on to feeling guilt for embracing leftist degeneracy. Talarico offered them a path out.
Aggie Dad Sip said:
Although there's no evidence at all to support it, let's say that James Talarico is gay and he's lying about his religion. So what? Is that any worse than being an amoral corruption machine like Ken Paxton?
If you wanna support Paxton because he supports your political positions, knock yourselves out. But sin is sin is sin is sin. None worse than another. The hand wringing around here about Talarico's morality or lack thereof is really silly.
All sin separates the individual from God but blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is on a level of its own. I don't know what's exactly in Talarico's heart but he's the only one verbalizing stuff that even calls the "unforgivable sin" into question
Rapier108 said:4 said:
I was listening to the Ruthless podcast today and those guys were saying that Jasmine Crockett is not only going around telling the black community not to vote for Talarico, but she is giving specific examples as to why they shouldn't...if you know what I mean.
There's no way he stays in the closet much longer.
He's still polling 80% or better with blacks because for most, the only thing that matters is the (D) by his name.
He could be the Grand Dragon of the KKK and they'd still vote for him because of that (D).
It's also pretty ironic that people are going to vote for a flaming homo because of his 'D'
AG512 said:
I'm really concerned he's going to win.
It's alarming how many people I thought had discernment seem to be falling for this guy.
Don't. He has no chance.
Just enjoy the show
Aggie Dad Sip said:
Although there's no evidence at all to support it, let's say that James Talarico is gay and he's lying about his religion. So what? Is that any worse than being an amoral corruption machine like Ken Paxton?
If you wanna support Paxton because he supports your political positions, knock yourselves out. But sin is sin is sin is sin. None worse than another. The hand wringing around here about Talarico's morality or lack thereof is really silly.
So dumb.
All sin is the same IN THE EYES OF GOD.
Not the same to men.
Telling your wife a little white lie that her new dress doesn't make her look fat is not the same thing as child r*pe.
Wake the hell up
4 said:AG512 said:
I'm really concerned he's going to win.
It's alarming how many people I thought had discernment seem to be falling for this guy.
Don't. He has no chance.
Just enjoy the show
Yup, the math ain't mathin'. He will lose, and he will lose HUGE.
They will convince themselves of anything to vote for communists. Whatever commie policy tickles them- the wide open borders, the no ID mass mailed elections, the existential threat of climate crisis, tax me harder daddy government, nationalizing health, equity of outcomes identity BS, murder your babies, trans your kids- they need to vote for it so they need to accept talaroc's freaky weirdness and crazy ass takes and be appalled Paxton has a girlfriend.
Urban Ag said:
Ok maybe we need to reset this thread.
I support pretty much every policy position that Paxton does. He was not who I wanted to see on the ballot but here we are.
I also put voting against the commie dem party as the primary reason I even vote and it's not even close.
That said, could Sip Dad or Old McDonald post why they support policy positions of Talarico and if they will be voting for him Nov?
Let's get back to policy and explain why you support a guy that wants an open border, legalized genital mutilation of minors, and is generally a communist.
I'll get back to you after the holiday with a sincere thoughtful response. I'm leaving now for some quality time with the family so I won't be on Texags for a few days. Y'all enjoy the holiday and and hug the ones you love whether they need it or not.
4 said:Aggie Dad Sip said:
Although there's no evidence at all to support it, let's say that James Talarico is gay and he's lying about his religion. So what? Is that any worse than being an amoral corruption machine like Ken Paxton?
If you wanna support Paxton because he supports your political positions, knock yourselves out. But sin is sin is sin is sin. None worse than another. The hand wringing around here about Talarico's morality or lack thereof is really silly.
So dumb.
All sin is the same IN THE EYES OF GOD.
Not the same to men.
Telling your wife a little white lie that her new dress doesn't make her look fat is not the same thing as child r*pe.
Wake the hell up
Still, you should be honest and tell her it's her fat that's making her look fat.
Paxton supports the policies I support. Talarico supports positions I abhor and consider anti-American stupidity. Therefore Paxton will get my vote.
And I guarantee you, if Jesus Christ Himself ran as a (R), He wouldn't get Talarico's vote.
He thinks it's okay to cut off breasts and *****es and he is a false preacher so if that's not bad enough, I know a sin is a sin, but we are warned about false preachers in the Bible.
I'll be voting Libertarian. Either of the other 2 options would be throwing my vote away.
94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
Lolz. Libertarian has always and will always be a throw away. But carry on and feel good about yourself
You guy won't win so your throwing your vote away
Aggie Dad Sip said:Urban Ag said:
Ok maybe we need to reset this thread.
I support pretty much every policy position that Paxton does. He was not who I wanted to see on the ballot but here we are.
I also put voting against the commie dem party as the primary reason I even vote and it's not even close.
That said, could Sip Dad or Old McDonald post why they support policy positions of Talarico and if they will be voting for him Nov?
Let's get back to policy and explain why you support a guy that wants an open border, legalized genital mutilation of minors, and is generally a communist.
I'll get back to you after the holiday with a sincere thoughtful response. I'm leaving now for some quality time with the family so I won't be on Texags for a few days. Y'all enjoy the holiday and and hug the ones you love whether they need it or not.
Don't vote for radicals, period.
I didn't. I brought in his stances on things that I don't want.Aggie Dad Sip said:Cinco Ranch Aggie said:
Don't matter any more at all? I mean, I can see that viewpoint if you just awoke from a coma that started a century ago. Did you ever hear the name Bill Clinton getting blowjobs in the Oval Office? JFK bringing in women not named Jackie to bang?
Ok, so we agree that character and integrity are quaint old fashioned ideals that have no place in American politics. So why bring someone's morals into the equation at all?
In 2026 if a candidate supports a voter's political positions he could be a devil worshipping trans cannibal with swastikas for hands and they'd joyfully skip to the polls to cast their vote for him/her.
Whoop2 said:
You guy won't win so your throwing your vote away
I don't have a guy. And I don't have to choose between an apostate and a reprobate. And voting for someone who aligns almost perfectly with Ron Paul is not something to be ashamed of. I'm not a Libertarian, but I do respect many of them. I find The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged to both be shallow, godless works, but libertarians do make honest discourse against the statist, globalist, interventionist, undisciplined overreach of both parties.
94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
The midterm Republican Convention is in Dallas Sept. 9-10.
President Trump understands how important this senate seat, lose it and an avalanche of dollars and support will pour out of the party.
President Trump understands how important this senate seat, lose it and an avalanche of dollars and support will pour out of the party.
94chem said:Whoop2 said:
You guy won't win so your throwing your vote away
I don't have a guy. And I don't have to choose between an apostate and a reprobate. And voting for someone who aligns almost perfectly with Ron Paul is not something to be ashamed of. I'm not a Libertarian, but I do respect many of them. I find The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged to both be shallow, godless works, but libertarians do make honest discourse against the statist, globalist, interventionist, undisciplined overreach of both parties.
Wait, who are you describing as you go down your rant?
94chem said:Whoop2 said:
You guy won't win so your throwing your vote away
I don't have a guy. And I don't have to choose between an apostate and a reprobate. And voting for someone who aligns almost perfectly with Ron Paul is not something to be ashamed of. I'm not a Libertarian, but I do respect many of them. I find The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged to both be shallow, godless works, but libertarians do make honest discourse against the statist, globalist, interventionist, undisciplined overreach of both parties.
It's a vote between capitalism and communism
Well, I'm still waiting for Mr. Talifreako to come outta the closet and tell us which of the 6 genders he is. We could be in for a surprise!
The first Senate candidate gender reveal! Yeah, that'll go well for him in Texas
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Agit8r said:
Well, I'm still waiting for Mr. Talifreako to come outta the closet and tell us which of the 6 genders he is. We could be in for a surprise!
Wait
What we see is him IN the closet!?
Woah
Teslag said:94chem said:Whoop2 said:
You guy won't win so your throwing your vote away
I don't have a guy. And I don't have to choose between an apostate and a reprobate. And voting for someone who aligns almost perfectly with Ron Paul is not something to be ashamed of. I'm not a Libertarian, but I do respect many of them. I find The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged to both be shallow, godless works, but libertarians do make honest discourse against the statist, globalist, interventionist, undisciplined overreach of both parties.
It's a vote between capitalism and communism
godless capitalism vs. godless socialism. I'm with Solzhenitsyn on that one.
94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
Featured Stories
See All
Testing your trivia knowledge from A&M's SEC era
by Olin Buchanan
22:30
1d ago
4.4k
10:48
1d ago
3.3k
Outfielder Alec Blair 'blessed' to finally be an Aggie
by Richard Zane
12:44
1d ago
2.1k
Stephen McGee plays buy, sell & lease with Fourth of July plans
by Richard Zane