Put some cash, booze or something down, not posting on a thread. What are we infants?
You can try to pull a bunch of stuff out of your butt if you want.irish pete ag06 said:Grapesoda2525 said:Careful what you wish for,Nuke LaLoosh said:
Best case scenario is that the race stays "close" and the rangers are buyers at the deadline. Please let this happen.
Our lineup is better than yours so far.
https://imgur.com/a/0PidxBE
Keeper of The Spirits said:
Put some cash, booze or something down, not posting on a thread. What are we infants?
Danny Vermin said:
I'll throw down the gauntlet.
We have 7 games against the assblows after the ASB.
Farmer, I'll wager the Rangers have the better record in those games and you obviously take the Stros. Loser does not get to post on this thread the rest of the season.
Deal?
You're smoking crack.Silent For Too Long said:
No one outside of Arlington would make such a stupid statement.
Tha Astros lineup, when healthy, was on a Murders Row pace, without Yordan Alvarez in it.
The only reason you can even try to make that argument right now is we lost hundreds of ABs from 5 all stars.
Historically good..........Farmer1906 said:
You're a middle of the pack offense. When heathy this team is historically good. Do you not see the difference?
Grapesoda2525 said:Historically good..........Farmer1906 said:
You're a middle of the pack offense. When heathy this team is historically good. Do you not see the difference?
Yeah right. Keep making "daddy" comments while quoting Eric trump son.
The dodgers, twins, and Yankees would destroy you guys in a series right now.
What's even funnier is your assumption that I was attacking him because of his political views. Quite frankly, this is America and not some 3rd world country, farmer can believe and vote for whoever he wants. I don't go after people for their political views, that's what terrible people do (on both sides).mazag08 said:
What's even funnier about this thread is grape soda making fun of someone for posting a quote Eric Trump retweeted.
One quick stroll at your politics board posting history shows you have absolutely no right to attempt to talk down to someone for political views.
Probably the only board that you embarrass yourself on more than this one.
Enjoy your late June "we got close" run. It already didn't last long. and we only get healthier and better from here. You just watched proven all stars and World Series winners striggle the most they have since 2016. And you actually think your patchwork team of scrubs and sausage diddlers is going to overtake them?
Hold my beer while I laugh in your face.
Oh and that "total runs scored" figure that you think proves you have the better offense.. we played the hardest schedule in the MLB through early June.. without our stud rookie even in the team, and absolutely demolished everyone we played. You can quote any stat you want, but if you asked any neutral bystander which offense they would take healthy, the answer wouldn't be the one with Roughned Odor on it and Hunter Pence as your best player.
Go ahead and edit your posts now. Because it's going to be fun revisiting this thread over and over and over again. You guys never learn.
Ag_07 said:
So lemme get this straight...Rangers are overachieving while the Astros are underachieving and the Rangers are still 6.5 GB and now their fanboys are puffing their chests?
That's sad
Silent For Too Long said:
No one outside of Arlington would make such a stupid statement.
Tha Astros lineup, when healthy, was on a Murders Row pace, without Yordan Alvarez in it.
The only reason you can even try to make that argument right now is we lost hundreds of ABs from 5 all stars.
Farmer1906 said:Danny Vermin said:
I'll throw down the gauntlet.
We have 7 games against the assblows after the ASB.
Farmer, I'll wager the Rangers have the better record in those games and you obviously take the Stros. Loser does not get to post on this thread the rest of the season.
Deal?
Have you even posted on this thread? I can't say i recognize you. But sure, why not? Seems silly to me, but y'all do have this obsession with head to head.
Ranger #007 said:Farmer1906 said:Danny Vermin said:
I'll throw down the gauntlet.
We have 7 games against the assblows after the ASB.
Farmer, I'll wager the Rangers have the better record in those games and you obviously take the Stros. Loser does not get to post on this thread the rest of the season.
Deal?
Have you even posted on this thread? I can't say i recognize you. But sure, why not? Seems silly to me, but y'all do have this obsession with head to head.
You're right, it seems out of place to talk about the head to head records between two teams on a trash talking thread about those two teams.
Are you actually this dense in person?
Farmer1906 said:
From the perspective of a mediocre team with no shot at all at winning a World Series head to head might mean something. But when you're a former world champion, who wins 100 games regularly, and is the favorite to be world champion again you don't sweat a few games regardless of who they're against. I wouldn't expect you to understand.
gigem1223 said:Farmer1906 said:
From the perspective of a mediocre team with no shot at all at winning a World Series head to head might mean something. But when you're a former world champion, who wins 100 games regularly, and is the favorite to be world champion again you don't sweat a few games regardless of who they're against. I wouldn't expect you to understand.
Lmao you win a title and you act like you're some blue blood program with a rich history.
jetch17 said:gigem1223 said:Farmer1906 said:
From the perspective of a mediocre team with no shot at all at winning a World Series head to head might mean something. But when you're a former world champion, who wins 100 games regularly, and is the favorite to be world champion again you don't sweat a few games regardless of who they're against. I wouldn't expect you to understand.
Lmao you win a title and you act like you're some blue blood program with a rich history.
Neither are you.
You're delusional.Farmer1906 said:
From the perspective of a mediocre team with no shot at all at winning a World Series head to head might mean something. But when you're a former world champion, who wins 100 games regularly, and is the favorite to be world champion again you don't sweat a few games regardless of who they're against. I wouldn't expect you to understand.
Ranger #007 said:
Sorry if it's a difficult notion that head to head might mean something. Even more so in the scope of a single season.
You know what's hilarious?Ag_07 said:Ranger #007 said:
Sorry if it's a difficult notion that head to head might mean something. Even more so in the scope of a single season.
Except that in reality it means absolutely nothing.