Well it should be about the students. I'm confused at what point in our history we put the possible safety of adults over what is best for children?AggieFrog said:Define 1% risk? Of dying? Of having a serious infection (which is > 1%)? Of there being substitute shortages (definitely > 1% if there is spread in the school)?The_Fox said:AggieFrog said:Because it's not just about the kids. It's faculty/staff safety, substitute availability, community spread, etc. It's just not that simple.AgLA06 said:
And we're back to questions regarding if decisions are being made in the best interest of the kids.
It absolutely should be. The mission of providing kids the best education possible should outweigh a 1% risk to the educators or administrators.
Sometimes, the mission comes first and outweighs the countervailing concerns. This is one of those times.
Like I said, it's just not that simple. Reducing it to merely being about the students is ignoring all the other issues.
If this is what is best for children, you make it happen one way or another.