The Mavs point differential is -4.2. That is very similar to Portland, Milwaukee, and Chicago this year. Yet those teams have +8, +5, and +4 wins more than the Mavs respectively.
What is interesting is that the Mavs have actually played the most clutch games in the league. They have also been 2nd worst in injuries per contract value. Basically all of the games missed by AD and Kyrie (~$90M combined salaries) represent a huge chunk of the salary cap gone missing.
So how are the Mavs losing so much more than their peers despite being semi-competitive in most games? I think the obvious answers are lack of PG play and shooting, i.e. terrible roster construction by Nico. Take a guy like PJ Washington. To me he is a winning player (he started on a finals team just 2 years ago), but is basically useless this year since he is surrounded by non-shooters and no ball handling. That is true for Gafford as a rim-rolling PNR big. True for a semi-washed Klay who needs a PG to initiate. Same for Christie. Maybe it is good for Flagg in the long run, but he won't be at peak efficiency if he has to initiate all of the offense.
So if Kyrie is somewhat back to his old self then he would fix part of the ball handling and shooting issues. If the Mavs draft another guard that is another fix, although maybe longer term. If the Mavs spend for a guard on the MLE, that is another fix. Just with common sense roster construction alone they can at least be competitive next year, probably at the 6 - 10 seedline.
What is interesting is that the Mavs have actually played the most clutch games in the league. They have also been 2nd worst in injuries per contract value. Basically all of the games missed by AD and Kyrie (~$90M combined salaries) represent a huge chunk of the salary cap gone missing.
So how are the Mavs losing so much more than their peers despite being semi-competitive in most games? I think the obvious answers are lack of PG play and shooting, i.e. terrible roster construction by Nico. Take a guy like PJ Washington. To me he is a winning player (he started on a finals team just 2 years ago), but is basically useless this year since he is surrounded by non-shooters and no ball handling. That is true for Gafford as a rim-rolling PNR big. True for a semi-washed Klay who needs a PG to initiate. Same for Christie. Maybe it is good for Flagg in the long run, but he won't be at peak efficiency if he has to initiate all of the offense.
So if Kyrie is somewhat back to his old self then he would fix part of the ball handling and shooting issues. If the Mavs draft another guard that is another fix, although maybe longer term. If the Mavs spend for a guard on the MLE, that is another fix. Just with common sense roster construction alone they can at least be competitive next year, probably at the 6 - 10 seedline.

