Ouch.
quote:
Plus, it's not like he's taking a max contract to play for a sh*tty team.
quote:
I think if he wants most important role and the most money he will want to be in Houston. Howard/Bosh is a nasty nasty combo.
quote:
That assumes Miami will offer $85-90 mil.
quote:
No, it actually allows them to offer all 3 guys the max if they want.
Also...
quote:
It could also have backfired if they didn't because he would have been unrestricted next year.
So what? You could have signed him to a big deal next year and still had cap flexibility to go after a big name FA next year before signing Parsons because the Rockets have his Bird Rights.
By allowing him to go to market this year, Morey boxed himself in to have to get a bigtime FA this year or a Parsons extension will suck up the majority of their cap space.
quote:quote:
That assumes Miami will offer $85-90 mil.
A 5 year $87.4M contract with Miami would put his 1st year salary at $15.2M. I don't think that's too far off from what Miami has been planning for all along.
If Bosh goes to Houston, it's because either LeBron has decided to bolt, or LeBron chooses to stay but Miami has gotten too cute and offered Bosh $60M and he gets insulted. Hard to envision Riley screwing up that bad, he knows what's at stake, and he's fully aware of Houston' offer.
[This message has been edited by cdhaggie07 (edited 7/8/2014 10:27a).]
quote:
By allowing him to go to market this year, Morey boxed himself in to have to get a bigtime FA this year or a Parsons extension will suck up the majority of their cap space.
quote:
Miami doesn't want to pay that much.
quote:
But if somebody like Dallas comes in and offers Parsons $15M to start, then Houston is at risk of striking out on all their FA targets and losing Parsons (or using all their cap space to resign him) when they could have had him for a little over $1M locked in for another year. I see both sides, but it's totally possible this decision backfires.
quote:
And if they kept Parsons at 900k rather than make him an RFA with a cap hold of 2.8mm, it would have been much easier to clear space for a max contract.
quote:quote:
And if they kept Parsons at 900k rather than make him an RFA with a cap hold of 2.8mm, it would have been much easier to clear space for a max contract.
Can someone explain to me why they didn't do this? I might have missed that convo. I was confused when I heard they declined the option.