Entertainment
Sponsored by

60 MINUTES this Sunday...[UFO Report]

97,703 Views | 1087 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by Rocagnante
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The internet is undefeated. Amazing find...

Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
so barry mcockinner wasn't legitimate after all?
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
dude, you can't have a sense of humor about this?

after all the **** you give people on this forum? come on.
Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chipotlemonger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I was about to say, those images looked like more of a movie's CGI creation than anything else. Not sure what...lens action...for lack of a better term from me, they use. But the images reminded me of the look and feel of Oblivion with Cruise.
Fenrir
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The splash looked fake as **** from the get go...
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If Adam Schiff says it needs investigating, I'm gonna go ahead and ignore the whole damn thing.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
redline248 said:

If Adam Schiff says it needs investigating, I'm gonna go ahead and ignore the whole damn thing.
Yes, I'm not sure there is a more insane, lying POS than that guy in government. And that is hard to do.
MW03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I feel like I can speak for the country when say if there is weird **** flying around in the sky, we should try and figure out what it is.

Rocagnante
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ruddyduck said:

so barry mcockinner wasn't legitimate after all?


His cousin is Howie Feltersnatch.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This military channel shows up on my suggested youtube links from time to time. This video caught my eye, and I thought about this thread. The first bit of the video looks like real footage (I don't know what aircraft or which country this is) and then around 6:15 is a drone that looks very unique. Anyway, my thought was this: we know that our own military has, in the past, worked on things for years before making them known to the public. The fact that we, and other countries, are talking about the next generation of aircraft makes me think the US already has some of this stuff in prototype, and it's still classified. I wouldn't be surprised if we are further along the tech path than what's in this video.

Obviously, this is speculation by me, but I think it's logical.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
By the way, did anyone read the report? Here are some key takeaways:
Quote:

Assumptions
Various forms of sensors that register UAP generally operate correctly and capture enough real data to allow initial assessments, but some UAP may be attributable to sensor anomalies.

Limited data and inconsistency in reporting are key challenges to evaluating UAP. No standardized reporting mechanism existed until the Navy established one in March 2019

The sensors mounted on U.S. military platforms are typically designed to fulfill specific missions. As a result, those sensors are not generally suited for identifying UAP.
Quote:

Some UAP appeared to remain stationary in winds aloft, move against the wind, maneuver abruptly, or move at considerable speed, without discernable means of propulsion. In a small number of cases, military aircraft systems processed radio frequency (RF) energy associated with UAP sightings.
A personal comment - I'm not sure what Radio Frequency energy means. Communications? Or maybe the type of energy between a remote control and a toy car - obviously on a larger scale?
Quote:

The UAPTF holds a small amount of data that appear to show UAP demonstrating acceleration or a degree of signature management. Additional rigorous analysis are necessary by multiple teams or groups of technical experts to determine the nature and validity of these data. We are conducting further analysis to determine if breakthrough technologies were demonstrated.
Quote:

Other:
Although most of the UAP described in our dataset probably remain unidentified due to limited data or challenges to collection processing or analysis, we may require additional scientific knowledge to successfully collect on, analyze and characterize some of them. We would group such objects in this category pending scientific advances that allowed us to better understand them. The UAPTF intends to focus additional analysis on the small number of cases where a UAP appeared to display unusual flight characteristics or signature management.
Honestly, nothing in the report sounds "physics breaking"
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Except that whole "without discernible means of propulsion" mention is pretty damn interesting.

Also, this is the public report, which is only six pages, not counting the cover page and two appendix pages. The classified congressional version is over 70 pages.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

Except that whole "without discernible means of propulsion" mention is pretty damn interesting.

Also, this is the public report, which is only six pages, not counting the cover page and two appendix pages. The classified congressional version is over 70 pages.
The follow up about radio frequency energy implies remote control, imo. Meaning it has a means of propulsion, they just couldn't register it with whatever sensor they used.

The public report is all I have to go by, and it is largely unconvincing. 700 pages of classified report? Why hide it if you're willing to say, already, that you don't know what this is? I think it's more likely that in the classified stuff is a bunch of top secret projects.

For example, we have unmanned drones that have been in development since mid 2000s, that the public has just learned about in the last couple years, of which no one still has good pictures.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
redline248 said:

This military channel shows up on my suggested youtube links from time to time. This video caught my eye, and I thought about this thread. The first bit of the video looks like real footage (I don't know what aircraft or which country this is) and then around 6:15 is a drone that looks very unique. Anyway, my thought was this: we know that our own military has, in the past, worked on things for years before making them known to the public. The fact that we, and other countries, are talking about the next generation of aircraft makes me think the US already has some of this stuff in prototype, and it's still classified. I wouldn't be surprised if we are further along the tech path than what's in this video.

Obviously, this is speculation by me, but I think it's logical.

The first part of that video is from the movie "Stealth"
AliasMan02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The report also reaffirms that many objects are physical, confirmed with multiple types of sensors/sources. That's a big one because it discredits a lot of the naysayers claiming that people are just seeing things, or they are witnessing atmospheric phenomena.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
redline248 said:

Quote:

Some UAP appeared to remain stationary in winds aloft, move against the wind, maneuver abruptly, or move at considerable speed, without discernable means of propulsion. In a small number of cases, military aircraft systems processed radio frequency (RF) energy associated with UAP sightings.
A personal comment - I'm not sure what Radio Frequency energy means. Communications? Or maybe the type of energy between a remote control and a toy car - obviously on a larger scale?

That almost certainly means the craft turned on a radar like emitter that broadcasts in the radio frequency range. I find it interesting how they sorta gloss over that. The nature of those signals would be the most telling thing of all.
If they "looked human" (like used typical techniques that we see currently) then that would rule out aliens. If they didn't, then I would think they would specify that.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aTmAg said:

redline248 said:

This military channel shows up on my suggested youtube links from time to time. This video caught my eye, and I thought about this thread. The first bit of the video looks like real footage (I don't know what aircraft or which country this is) and then around 6:15 is a drone that looks very unique. Anyway, my thought was this: we know that our own military has, in the past, worked on things for years before making them known to the public. The fact that we, and other countries, are talking about the next generation of aircraft makes me think the US already has some of this stuff in prototype, and it's still classified. I wouldn't be surprised if we are further along the tech path than what's in this video.

Obviously, this is speculation by me, but I think it's logical.

The first part of that video is from the movie "Stealth"
Thanks. That sort of bugs me that this specific channel would use a movie design to kick off the video.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ha, TMZ now getting in on the UFO craze, with Jeremy Corbell

TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It would be hilarious and so weirdly fitting if TMZ is the one to eventually break the "scoop" that we're not alone.
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
it would kind of shock me if they're not the ones to break it to be honest.
Spyderman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What do you guys think about this slow drip disclosure currently taking place? Do you ever think the ongoing cover-up will be addressed?
Grab some popcorn...why the ongoing cover-up? The Phenomenon: FF to 1:22:35 https://tubitv.com/movies/632920/the-phenomenon

An est. 68 MILLION Americans, including 19 MILLION Black Children, have been killed in the WOMB since 1973-act, pray and vote accordingly.

TAMU purpose statement: To develop leaders of character dedicated to serving the greater good. Team entrance song at KYLE FIELD is laced with profanity including THE Nword..
The greater good?
AliasMan02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Spyderman said:

What do you guys think about this slow drip disclosure currently taking place? Do you ever think the ongoing cover-up will be addressed?

I can't think of anything that has been such a long, slow drip. It dates back three administrations, crosses party lines, involves NASA and the intelligence community and the military.

Normally sensational things are used to get the right press at election time or to draw attention away to some scandal or other, but that's not really the deal here, either.

I remember when NASA started releasing some reports on this sort of thing years ago, it was suggested that this is all about preparing people for a bombshell. It's a pretty good explanation as to why this has gone the way it has.
Rocagnante
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Back in late 90's/early 00's I was interested in Roswell, even read a couple of books. Some of the military response didn't really make sense if it was just a weather balloon. Then the Air Force announced a big new "revelation" about the incident.said it was really some kind of balloon experiment they were doing with mannequins at high altitude. At that point I was like whatever. Either there was no crashed UFO or if there really was the gov't would never admit anything. After that didn't pay much attention to any of the noise that came out in the subsequent years.

Then this came up. First time gov't is admitting and confirming some things. Listening to the pilots, combined with radar data and videos released, then yeah it looks like some strange object is being observed. But really need clearer video evidence to confirm what it is.

Unless they release more evidence, then for me it's kind of coming around to how I settled on Roswell. Either there are no tic tac strange objects, or if there really are these objects then the gov't is never going to admit what they really know. Then this too will fade into the background.
mrmill3218
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What does everyone think about the Zimbabwe school visitation?

Link below for reference.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.news24.com/amp/witness/archive/The-day-the-aliens-landed-20150430
Wrec86 Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Spyderman said:

What do you guys think about this slow drip disclosure currently taking place? Do you ever think the ongoing cover-up will be addressed?


The government can't cover up a sneeze yet you think multiple administrations and their appointees can pull a long-con where they know about aliens and take 10-50 years (depending on exactly what you believe) to slowly disclose it? That's literally the dumbest thing I've ever seen on TexAgs. and I've seen a lot.


Spyderman - if it's aliens like you hope and believe, the government is basically as clueless about it as we all are.
AliasMan02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
mrmill3218 said:

What does everyone think about the Zimbabwe school visitation?

Link below for reference.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.news24.com/amp/witness/archive/The-day-the-aliens-landed-20150430


Memory is SOOOO fragile and malleable. Especially for kids. Remember that your brain can't tell the difference between a real memory and a fabricated one once it's wired in. This is definitely interesting, but the source isn't great. I don't think they're LYING but it's certainly possible that it was implanted or fabricated back in the day.
Rocagnante
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Happy Independence Day y'all


double aught
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Fogburn95 said:

Happy Independence Day y'all



That speech deserves its own thread.
Teddy Perkins
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Anyone watch The Cosmic Hoax by Greer? Greer puts Elizando and Mellon on blast claiming they are mouthpieces for a government false flag operation. Greer also claims that the government has its own UFO technology and are using it to stage sightings while keeping the tech from its citizens.

TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Greer has been peddling bullsh*t for decades now. Dude is a complete fraud.
Teddy Perkins
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Before I knew any better he came across as genuine and then I noticed he was peddling his CT5 junk at the end of all his videos and I got a dirty car salesman vibe from him.
Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://theunexplained.tv/episodes/edition-554-george-knapp-jeremy-corbell-and-steve-bassett

https://theunexplained.tv/episodes/edition-555-john-b-alexander
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.