Is Greenland next?

77,281 Views | 1136 Replies | Last: 3 min ago by Gaeilge
HoustonAggie11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dan Carlin said:

4 said:

Hubert J. Farnsworth said:

Dan Carlin said:

bobbranco said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

bobbranco said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

bobbranco said:

t_J_e_C_x said:

Seeing posts advocating for the invasion of Ukrainian sovereignty by Russia and America invading the sovereignty of Denmark on F16 is wild.


Who exactly is advocating for invasion of Greenland?




Let's not be obtuse ignore the many veiled calls for military action to take Greenland that have been shared in here via supportive tweets and or words.

Economic pressure to get better deals out of Danish government are great, but military action? Cmon.


Got it. No proof.

Way to command your argument.


Coming back to check in on this thread. Seems I was proven right. These last couple pages are all in on taking it by force.

What a joke.

Joke is on you. Best option is to broker a deal not invade. It is enjoyable to read the idea of taking Greenland only to witness the idiotic mental masturbation.

Discussion has been primarily about the fear of destroying NATO when taking Greenland by force. Really?

Given this state of fear, let's explore taking Greenland by force. What happens next? Denmark declares war on the US? Yeah right. All other NATO countries will align against the US? Dream on. NATO demands US withdraw troops from Europe? LOL.

Danish defense budget is $28 Billion.

US defense budget is $850 Billion.

We have the might. Negotiations will proceed to the West's benefit.



Some people seem okay with mafia style "make them a deal they can't refuse" diplomacy towards our closest allies. What a betrayal of American values.


Lol at the Euro's being our "closest allies". Japan and South Korea are the best allies the US has today. The Euro's have been leeching off of us for decades, so that they could fund their socialist programs, and then have the gall to trash talk us at every turn.

Yep.

F em. F NATO. F the UN.

They all collapse without us. We ARE NATO and the UN.

Let them sink or swim in their own.

I'm done with them.


NATO is the most successful military alliance in history but thanks for reminding us where the Kremlin stands on the matter.

2016 called they want their Russia conspiracy theories back
4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thanks to us.

NATO isn't an alliance as much as it is the European continent turning and looking at us when there's a problem and saying, "hey, you guys going to come protect us?"

Oh, at your expense, too...
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
NATO has had only one country invoke article five. That was us. Denmark responded, and 43 Danes died in Afghanistan at our behest.

This is utterly shameful and pathetic. If Trump gave the order to invade Greenland, I honestly wonder if it would be followed.
Ozzy Osbourne
How long do you want to ignore this user?
But the thing is, Europe/NATO needs us. We don't need them.

In fact, they can have their silly little socialist governments because we're paying a good chunk of our GDP for their defense.

Nobody really needs the Danes to come fight in Afghanistan. Good on them for coming to our aid, but let's not pretend they turned the tide.

I'm not crazy about Trump using tarriffs to bully Europe into supporting us, but I also don't think we should be in NATO. If Europe doesn't want our help... okay!
MemphisAg1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GAC06 said:

NATO has had only one country invoke article five. That was us. Denmark responded, and 43 Danes died in Afghanistan at our behest.

This is utterly shameful and pathetic. If Trump gave the order to invade Greenland, I honestly wonder if it would be followed.

It is shameful. And so unnecessary. We already have access to military bases on Greenland and could negotiate expansions if needed. Another unforced error by Trump.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Exactly. If we wanted an expanded military presence, we'd have it. Before now that is.
MemphisAg1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
NATO is fine. Trump has done a great job of getting them to step up and pay more for their defense. That is very good Trump.

Then he goes and blows that with this ridiculously stupid suggestion that we might take Greenland by force, or for the moment, levy heavy tariffs on European nations who don't want to hand it over.

Jekyll and Hyde.
MemphisAg1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GAC06 said:

Exactly. If we wanted an expanded military presence, we'd have it. Before now that is.

Yeah, that option's probably gone for awhile. Great move Trump.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logos Stick said:

nai06 said:

Hubert J. Farnsworth said:

Old McDonald said:

Hubert J. Farnsworth said:

Just take it. What is Europe going to do about it? I'm all for bringing back "might is right". They can't afford any type of elite military with their socialism that they have to pay for. The US could wipe any of their militaries combined off of the map.
lol ok man


Hey clown. What would Europe do? Do you really think they could stand up to us? Only liberals, like you, would take their side.


Militarily probably nothing in the moment, but this would likely kill NATO. I'd expect Americans abroad would be expelled from every NATO country as would the U.S. military from every foreign base.

Forget tariffs, countries would blacklist u.s. business and but an embargo on any U.S. made good. Individually no single country could do this on their own. But we would be serving ourselves up as a common enemy most of Europe if not the world could unite against. It would signal that the U.S. does not respect the sovereignty of any nation, including our allies which would mean we could no longer be trusted in any way, shape, or form.



Lololol. They are not going to expel us. We protect those losers.

We are the largest economy on earth and have the reserve currency because of that. They will not embargo anything because it would be much worse for them than us.


Europe knows they just have to stick together and weather it until our courts or congress intervenes.

I would love to see Greenland become part of the US, but not like this. This is not how we treat our allies.

If Greenland doesn't want to become part of the US and Denmark says it's not for sale then that leaves putting whatever military installations we want to put on Greenland, which our allies would be fine with.
No, I don't care what CNN or Miss NOW said this time
Ad Lunam
Green2Maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They don't want to become part of the US. People don't get this reality.
boulderaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
NATO was very successful and served it's purpose well as a counter to the Soviet Union. The USSR doesn't exist anymore and Europe is basically lost and one generation away from being out-bred into something unrecognizable. I think Trump, right or wrong, is trying to position us for the paradigm that comes next. It sure looks like Trump is thinking in terms of the Western Hemisphere. He's removing the influence of China, Iran, and Russia from Central and South America - first in Panama, then Venezuela, and now applying pressure to Colombia and Cuba. Will we start hearing Brazil getting called out? Then add in Greenland and its strategic importance coupled with Trump's Golden Dome initiative, things start to make a little more sense. I wonder if some type of a new Western Hemispheric Alliance is on the horizon. Whatever is going on, I think we can all agree that we're living in VERY interesting times.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

things start to make a little more sense


Let me know when that happens. Thank you for your attention to this matter!
Green2Maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why isn't Brazil a rich and powerful country by now? They have a lot of stuff in their favor.
HoustonAggie11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Danes did horrible things to the Greenlanders; save your tears for the poor Danes they don't give a **** about the people there only that its their land and they hate Trump.
boulderaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Danes sterilized the Inuits there, didn't they?
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Danes were mean? How progressive. Why didn't you preface your post that you made it from stolen land?
Green2Maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They were pretty horrible to the native Inuit population.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well I guess someone better take over our land too.
HoustonAggie11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boulderaggie said:

The Danes sterilized the Inuits there, didn't they?

among other things.


Quote:

Last December, Greenland's prime minister Mte Egede described this as "straightforward genocide, carried out by the Danish state against the Greenland population".
He made the remark while talking to the Danish Broadcasting Corporation in an interview that dealt generally with relations between Greenland and Denmark.
Also, in the 1960s and 1970s hundreds of children from the island were taken from their mothers, often on dubious grounds, to be reared by foster parents in Denmark. In some cases, this happened without the consent of the biological mothers, and in other instances, they were not informed that their ties with their children would be cut completely.
This left a raw emotional wound that often was not healed decades later. Some of the adopted Greenlandic children were later able to trace their biological parents, but many others were not.
A small group demanded compensation from the Danish state in the summer of 2024. If they are successful, it could pave the way for a large number of similar claims by other adoptees.

Denmark vs the US: What Greenland really wants

I guess according to some Danes were just meanie pants.lmao
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well I guess we better steal their land.
boulderaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wow. I didn't know it was that bad.
Green2Maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It was pretty bad.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GAC06 said:

NATO has had only one country invoke article five. That was us. Denmark responded, and 43 Danes died in Afghanistan at our behest.

This is utterly shameful and pathetic. If Trump gave the order to invade Greenland, I honestly wonder if it would be followed.


Trump won't even bloody the nose of the domestic terrorists in this country who are literally attacking ICE and destroying cities. Same response he had in Trump v1 with Floyd rioters. But sure, he could possibly give the order to invade Greenland.

The nonsense you guys believe is mind boggling.

/hardest eye roll in human history
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Will he? I hope not. Honestly I think he couldn't even if he tried.

However he has implied that he might, over and over. Absolute clown behavior that shouldn't be tolerated, but here we have the "lol screw the Danes" crowd.
Hubert J. Farnsworth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I honestly think this whole Greenland thing is Trump trying to get something else out of it. He's not a genius, but he's gotten pretty good at getting the screeching liberals/dems to zone in on the meat dangling from one of his hands while the other hand is doing something else. The crap he says that enrages them is part of it.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
24D chess
Hubert J. Farnsworth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GAC06 said:

24D chess


Not even close. It's checkers, but it doesn't take much to fool liberals.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Are they being "fooled"?
Hubert J. Farnsworth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GAC06 said:

Are they being "fooled"?


I don't know. It's just my opinion that this Greenland thing is about getting something else(I'm not talking about land).
Captain Winky
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You are done with them? Like, you personally had dealings with them and you are now cutting them out of your life?
Ramdiesel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MemphisAg1 said:

NATO is fine. Trump has done a great job of getting them to step up and pay more for their defense. That is very good Trump.

Then he goes and blows that with this ridiculously stupid suggestion that we might take Greenland by force, or for the moment, levy heavy tariffs on European nations who don't want to hand it over.

Jekyll and Hyde.


Yeah, it's getting nuts. Is he truly concerned about national security and NATO security? Or, would taking Greenland be another move to stop China and stop the Yuan from becoming the worlds reserve currency (same reason we took out Maduro and taking over Venezuela for the time being).. I mean does he want Greenlands minerals and wealth in the ground to boost the value of the US dollar? Would he be crazy enough to take it by force and basically end NATO.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

I'd love to see an estimate of how much we'd save by not stationing forces in Europe. It's got to be astronomical. It's not as though most of those countries pay for our expenses, though I believe there is some compensation from Poland or something, to where something like a fifth or a third of our costs are covered.

Don't threaten me with a good time, euro's. I see no interest in protecting the coming European caliphate with my kids or anyone else's. And we don't even share free speech values at this point with their ruling class.

And by the way, about that sanctity of NATO allies, Greece is about to re-define it's border in the Aegean, in a way Turkey has long threatened to go to war with them over. But borders are sacred and permanent.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

I did not have Italy being the adult in the room on their side of the pond this year, but here we are. I've read that Macron is threatening to tariff US goods/has raised some sort of bureaucratic point of order at the EU to do so, over Trump's Greenland comments/tariffs. Not sure how valid this source is though;
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump's gonna freaking get Greenland isn't he??
dds08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is a petulant child that's not getting what he/she wants esque move by Trump unless this is some art of the deal crap.

We have too much to lose with the midterms coming. He cannot wait till after midterms to try and push this through?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.