Ellis Wyatt said:

---

shiftyandquick said:

---

1. Flood the world with oil. Invade a country to get more oil
2. Stop wind power throughout the US.
3. Stop the electric car industry.
4. Take over Greenland.
5. Melt the Greenland ice cap through global warming.

PROFIT.
This is 100-D Chess.

---

Huh?

We have strategic interests in Greenland. Europe is completely nutless and cannot even defend itself. We can't count on a single country over there to have our backs because they can't defend themselves. We are going to have to develop our own defense plan that we can execute alone. If that means taking Greenland to keep the Russians, Chinese, and invading muslim hordes out, so be it.

---

Article V already covers Greenland and neither entity wants to give it up…

Soooo…

Rossticus said:

---

KentK93 said:

---

AgBQ-00 said:

---

most important land purchase for us since Louisiana purchase? Or would Alaska be more important?

---

Man throwing shade on the Gadsden Purchase?

---

In retrospect, we should have just bought the whole of Mexico outright. Would have solved a lot of problems.

---

Not having control of the gulf of California is one of the worst geopolitical moves we made. Come on Polk!

Opportunity missed to have Gulf of America 1 and Gulf of America 2

AlaskanAg99 said:

---

Greenland should be a territory and NOT a state. 57k residents do not qualify you for statehood.

Full trade, currency, banking, citizenship and defense. Northern Puerto Rico.

---

Excellent idea. When Greenland suffers a major natural disaster, the president can show up, gibber incoherently, toss a few rolls of paper towels at the incredulous locals, and painfully waddle off to Air Force One.

We must get Greenland before the Dems win another presidency. For reference, see Crimea, and Donbas.

It a wonder we don't make Taiwan a territory.

I hope we don't nuke Denmark, but the Dutch need to be wiped from the earth.

Incoherent gibberish and toilet paper? This isn't 2022 and Biden isn't still president.

YouBet said:

---

I hope we don't nuke Denmark, but the Dutch need to be wiped from the earth.

---

YouBet said:

---

I hope we don't nuke Denmark, but the Dutch need to be wiped from the earth.

---

George: "What is Holland?"
Jerry: "What do you mean, 'what is it?' It's a country right next to Belgium."
George: "No, that's the Netherlands."
Jerry: "Holland is the Netherlands!"
George: "Then who are the Dutch?

China already has a larger population in Greenland than the USA

hunter2012 said:

---

---

Be prepared because NATO has reinforced Greenland

Number of military personnel European countries are sending to Greenland Per Reuters/Bloomberg

🇩🇪 Germany: 13
🇳🇴 Norway: 2
🇬🇧 UK: 1 pic.twitter.com/8qYxWKCWfx

— OSZ (@OpenSourceZone) January 15, 2026

White House asking Greenland which way:

Which way, Greenland man? https://t.co/G0NnJdZRJK pic.twitter.com/TLmOwst6M6

— The White House (@WhiteHouse) January 14, 2026

KentK93 said:

---

hunter2012 said:

---

---

Be prepared because NATO has reinforced Greenland

Number of military personnel European countries are sending to Greenland Per Reuters/Bloomberg

🇩🇪 Germany: 13
🇳🇴 Norway: 2
🇬🇧 UK: 1 pic.twitter.com/8qYxWKCWfx

— OSZ (@OpenSourceZone) January 15, 2026

---

My how the mighty fall, one had conquered 1/4 of the world, the other had entirely conquered Western Europe almost single-handedly.

YouBet said:

---

I hope we don't nuke Denmark, but the Dutch need to be wiped from the earth.

---

It's true. Nobody likes the Dutch.

The Dirty Dozen + 1 German style

“13-strong!” 🤣🤣 pic.twitter.com/hEfp7be4mZ

— Election Wizard (@ElectionWiz) January 15, 2026

YouBet said:

---

Fitch said:

---

Danish and Greenlandic representatives are at the White House today to meet with Vance, Rubio, others.

---

Looking forward to hear the actual deal. Assuming they tell us.

---

How could they possibly sell this? "Hey, we want to purchase your Island so we can set up a security dome to knock down Nukes and other Missiles right over the top of you, if it ever comes to that." "But, we will make your citizens rich."

Ramdiesel said:

---

YouBet said:

---

Fitch said:

---

Danish and Greenlandic representatives are at the White House today to meet with Vance, Rubio, others.

---

Looking forward to hear the actual deal. Assuming they tell us.

---

How could they possibly sell this? "Hey, we want to purchase your Island so we can set up a security dome to knock down Nukes and other Missiles right over the top of you, if it ever comes to that." "But, we will make your citizens rich."

---

Making people rich is a pretty big incentive. Maybe the biggest.

What a show of support

🚨🇬🇧🇳🇴 GREENLAND SECURITY UPDATE: NATO’S STRONGEST DUO HAS ARRIVED

UK deploys 1 soldier to Greenland.

Norway ups the ante with 2.

Total force now 3 people, one tent, and a very serious commitment to “defense.”

Source: @Polymarket pic.twitter.com/yQFX6czOh4

— Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) January 15, 2026

One squad?

Good lord, this is laughable.

You didn't even send a platoon. Maybe one company.

Good luck when the Chinese arrive.

Turns out Germany is more ready to fight USA than Russia in Ukraine 🤷‍♂️ https://t.co/aTelxGGx1E

— Dimko Zhluktenko 🇺🇦⚔️ (@dim0kq) January 14, 2026

K2-HMFIC said:

---

Ted Cruz, 2016: “We’re liable to wake up one morning and Donald, if he were president, would have nuked Denmark.” pic.twitter.com/EtjvMuDzFk

— Daractenus (@Daractenus) January 14, 2026

There's a tweet for everything

---

Cruz changed his tune wisely.

Seeing posts advocating for the invasion of Ukrainian sovereignty by Russia and America invading the sovereignty of Denmark on F16 is wild.

I suspect all of this is Trump blustering to get a better deal negotiated and that could be bigger than Greenland specifically. As an example, he could push Europe for more antagonistic policies with China.

I would be strongly opposite to a military solution. We could absolutely take it but the domino effect from that decision would be counterproductive imo. We don't need Europe becoming chummy with China.

t_J_e_C_x said:

---

Seeing posts advocating for the invasion of Ukrainian sovereignty by Russia and America invading the sovereignty of Denmark on F16 is wild.

---

Who exactly is advocating for invasion of Greenland?

MaxPower said:

---

I suspect all of this is Trump blustering to get a better deal negotiated and that could be bigger than Greenland specifically. As an example, he could push Europe for more antagonistic policies with China.

I would be strongly opposite to a military solution. We could absolutely take it but the domino effect from that decision would be counterproductive imo. We don't need Europe becoming chummy with China.

---

I can understand all that and get behind it, but full blown military action would cause ripples so massive it would be devestating to any Americans outside the top 1% whose wealth and position can insulate them.

Prescriptions alone would be impossible to afford or find. Not to mention food, electricity, sensors and chips which would stop every production line that requires both which are so many items these days.

bobbranco said:

---

t_J_e_C_x said:

---

Seeing posts advocating for the invasion of Ukrainian sovereignty by Russia and America invading the sovereignty of Denmark on F16 is wild.

---

Who exactly is advocating for invasion of Greenland?

---

Let's not be obtuse ignore the many veiled calls for military action to take Greenland that have been shared in here via supportive tweets and or words.

Economic pressure to get better deals out of Danish government are great, but military action? Cmon.

t_J_e_C_x said:

---

bobbranco said:

---

t_J_e_C_x said:

---

Seeing posts advocating for the invasion of Ukrainian sovereignty by Russia and America invading the sovereignty of Denmark on F16 is wild.

---

Who exactly is advocating for invasion of Greenland?

---

Let's not be obtuse ignore the many veiled calls for military action to take Greenland that have been shared in here via supportive tweets and or words.

Economic pressure to get better deals out of Danish government are great, but military action? Cmon.

---

Got it. No proof.

Way to command your argument.

t_J_e_C_x said:

---

MaxPower said:

---

I suspect all of this is Trump blustering to get a better deal negotiated and that could be bigger than Greenland specifically. As an example, he could push Europe for more antagonistic policies with China.

I would be strongly opposite to a military solution. We could absolutely take it but the domino effect from that decision would be counterproductive imo. We don't need Europe becoming chummy with China.

---

I can understand all that and get behind it, but full blown military action would cause ripples so massive it would be devestating to any Americans outside the top 1% whose wealth and position can insulate them.

Prescriptions alone would be impossible to afford or find. Not to mention food, electricity, sensors and chips which would stop every production line that requires both which are so many items these days.

---

Remain calm.

Nobody is going to invade Greenland.

ETA, if we did none of the emboldened would occur.

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump PUMMELS Fake News reporter in the Oval Office

"You'd potentially acquire Greenland by force."

TRUMP: You're saying that.

"Are you saying that?"

TRUMP: No, YOU'RE saying that. You're telling ME. You DON'T KNOW what I'm gonna do. Your NETWORK… pic.twitter.com/O3AbDuEiQ7

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) January 14, 2026

t_J_e_C_x said:

---

MaxPower said:

---

I suspect all of this is Trump blustering to get a better deal negotiated and that could be bigger than Greenland specifically. As an example, he could push Europe for more antagonistic policies with China.

I would be strongly opposite to a military solution. We could absolutely take it but the domino effect from that decision would be counterproductive imo. We don't need Europe becoming chummy with China.

---

I can understand all that and get behind it, but full blown military action would cause ripples so massive it would be devestating to any Americans outside the top 1% whose wealth and position can insulate them.

Prescriptions alone would be impossible to afford or find. Not to mention food, electricity, sensors and chips which would stop every production line that requires both which are so many items these days.

---

Prescriptions - this is a strategic critical issue for us and one that should be corrected. However, if countries withheld drugs then they are inviting massive retaliation and they know that.

Food - we are the most food secure country on the planet (and it's not close) and can 100% feed ourselves. Not an issue.

Electricity - we are 100% energy independent if we need to be. Not an issue.

Sensors - can't speak to this.

Chips - I doubt other countries would commit economic suicide by withholding chips to us.

This is taking too long. Can't we get a 30 day closing?

shiftyandquick said:

---

YouBet said:

---

shiftyandquick said:

---

1. Flood the world with oil. Invade a country to get more oil
2. Stop wind power throughout the US.
3. Stop the electric car industry.
4. Take over Greenland.
5. Melt the Greenland ice cap through global warming.

PROFIT.
This is 100-D Chess.

---

1. Don't be a communist dictatorship that is the base of operations for Hezbollah, China, and Russia in our Hemisphere and you won't get your leader snatched.

2. Wind power hasn't remotely been stopped throughout the US. Wind power only makes sense in geographic areas where there is actually wind. Stop lying.

3. EV cars are still getting made at a healthy clip. The only thing that's been stopped are far left wing CAFE standards that have increased the cost of vehicles to an average price of $50K. And market corrections back to actual customer demand for them. Quit lying.

4. We've made them an offer. They are free to say no.

5. The earth is going to do what the earth is going to do.

---

https://www.cnn.com/2025/12/22/climate/trump-offshore-wind-suspension-virginia

---

Why do you hate whales?