They only own ~$100M in treasuries...pocket change in terms of the gov't debt market.
— Luc (@investingluc) January 20, 2026
More symbolic than anything pic.twitter.com/2hRTxXw753
Owlagdad said:
I just heard UK gave away diego Garcia. This is reason we need Greenland. Europe is so weak.
Malibu said:Logos Stick said:Malibu said:
I have a refi in progress that won't rate lock until this week. Not hyperbole, mathematical reality based on Treasury movement, Trumps bluster here has just cost me and my investors hundreds of thousands of dollars. My borrowing costs are going up due to weakened trust and less liquidity for US debt and currency. It can and will get a lot worse if we keep this up.
Hopefully its mainly libs getting jobbed by the higher mortgage rates.
I also find it funny when libs - who are all about equity and concerned about wealth gaps - complain about cash flowing out of their pockets to others. Lots of 401ks for old poor people have MBS in them. Your mortgage - at a higher rate - will be packaged into an MBS and then some retiree will benefit. You are doing good here.
Ah yes, the broken windows theory of portfolio management.
Bond market gonna bond market.
— Brian Sullivan (@SullyCNBC) January 20, 2026
Despite three rate cuts last year and talk of more this year yields are going in the opposite direction.
This should be top of your radar. pic.twitter.com/NNAVQUUi6a
Logos Stick said:
we already know that. welcome to the past
Owlagdad said:
I just heard UK gave away diego Garcia. This is reason we need Greenland. Europe is so weak.
GAC06 said:Owlagdad said:
I just heard UK gave away diego Garcia. This is reason we need Greenland. Europe is so weak.
Diego Garcia is the reason we need Greenland? Have you looked at a map?
Old McDonald said:this is a ridiculous comparison even for you. bin laden killed thousands of americans. he was our enemy. the danes fought alongside us and even died in the war that bin laden's actions started.HoustonAggie11 said:
They would actively root for Bin Laden if he was alive today.
Owlagdad said:
I just heard UK gave away diego Garcia. This is reason we need Greenland. Europe is so weak.
Quote:
The UK will hand sovereignty of the territory over to Mauritius and lease the Diego Garcia base from the Mauritian government over 99 years;
It will ban other powers from using the islands around Diego Garcia without agreement with the UK;
Mauritius will be free to arrange for resettlement of Chagossians on all islands except Diego Garcia;
The period can be extended by a further 40 years, if both parties agree;
Sir Keir said the average cost per year is 101m. Sky News analysis suggests the total cost could rise as high as 30bn;
Both the Commons and the Mauritian parliament need to ratify the deal.
Quote:
The Trump administration previously supported the Chagos Islands deal, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio issuing a statement in May last year saying, "following a comprehensive interagency review, the Trump Administration determined that this agreement secures the long-term, stable, and effective operation of the joint U.S.-UK military facility at Diego Garcia."
Rubio said at the time that Mr. Trump had "expressed his support for this monumental achievement during his meeting with Prime Minister Starmer at the White House," calling the base "a critical asset for regional and global security."
K2-HMFIC said:
If the Euros start selling off T-bills…and the dollar loses reserve status…things will go very badly in the US, very quickly.
“If in 10 years, all American troops stationed in Europe for national defense purposes have not been returned to the United States, then this whole project [NATO] will have failed.”
— InfantryDort (@infantrydort) January 19, 2026
-General of the Army Dwight Eisenhower, February, 1951 pic.twitter.com/GliJr7EtYO
YouBet said:
Addition to 1 - Keir Starmer is trying to get the Big 3 countries over there to ban X because it's the only social media platform out there that isn't regulated in favor of far-left wing propaganda.
Western Europe, for all of their concern over Trump blowing up the Western world, is every bit as much to blame here. But, as usual, the left will never take accountability for anything that they do.
Quote:
Apple EU (European Commission + national regulators)
- Fines (20202025):
- ~500million DMA fine for appstore steering / antisteering (202425).[1][2]
- Additional competition fines in the **hundreds of millions of euros** across music streaming and appstore cases.[3][1]
- Nonmonetary: must allow alternative app stores and sideloading; required to change appstore terms, fees, and defaults under DMA gatekeeper rules.[1][4]
Google (Alphabet) EU
- Fines:
- Earlier antitrust fines (Android, Shopping, AdSense) totaling **over 8billion** mostly pre2020 but still relevant context.[5]
- France CNIL: **90million** and **60million** fines in 2021 for cookieconsent violations (Google and YouTube).[6]
- Other GDPR/ePrivacy fines in France and elsewhere totaling **tens to low hundreds of millions of euros**.[6][7]
- Nonmonetary: DMA/DSA obligations forcing changes to default search/browser options, adtech practices, and datause/transparency.[1][8][4]
Google (Alphabet) UK
- Fines: competition/privacy fines so far in the **lowmillionsofpounds** range.[5][9]
- Nonmonetary: binding CMA commitments on Privacy Sandbox and adtech (limits on selfpreferencing, safeguards for rivals).[5][9]
Meta (Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp) EU
- Fines:
- **1.2billion** GDPR fine for Facebook EUUS data transfers (2023).[7]
- **265million** GDPR fine for Facebook data scraping / phonenumber leak (2022).[6]
- **225million** GDPR fine for WhatsApp transparency failures (2021).[6]
- Approx. **839.8million** EU competition fine for tying Facebook Marketplace to Facebook's social network (2024).[10]
- Around **200million** DMA fine for gatekeeper noncompliance (2025).[1][2]
- Nonmonetary: forced to change ads legal basis and "payorconsent" model; stricter limits and conditions on EUUS data transfers; DMA obligations on interoperability and datasharing.[6][1][7][4]
Meta UK
- Fines: about **1.5million** from the CMA for failures to comply with informationrequest orders during the Giphy merger review.[5][9]
- Nonmonetary: ordered divestiture of Giphy; ICOdriven changes for children's privacy and default settings.[5][9]
Amazon EU
- Fines:
- **746million** GDPR fine from Luxembourg DPA in 2021 for unlawful targeted advertising (one of the largest GDPR fines).[6][7]
- Additional competition investigations and commitments (e.g., marketplace selfpreferencing) without comparable billioneuro fines yet.
- Nonmonetary: under DMA, must curb marketplace selfpreferencing, share more data with thirdparty sellers, and adjust Prime/logistics tying practices.[1][8][4]
Microsoft EU / UK
- Fines: smaller and more scattered than Google/Meta; enforcement over last few years mostly via **ongoing investigations and settlements** rather than headline multihundredmillioneuro fines.[8][11][4]
- Nonmonetary: EU and UK pressure to unbundle Teams from Office and to change cloud licensing / interoperability rules; potential structural remedies pending.[11][4]
TikTok EU
- Fines:
- **345million** GDPR fine from Ireland's DPC (2023) over children's accounts and default public profiles.[6]
- Additional EU privacy and datatransfer fines in 202425 reported in the **hundreds of millions of euros** combined.[7][12]
- Nonmonetary: required changes to children's privacy defaults, ageverification, and transparency; subject to DSA obligations with potential for further feature restrictions.[6][13][12]
TikTok EU institutions and memberstate governments
- Fines: none (these are bans, not monetary penalties).
- Nonmonetary: banned on official devices by the European Commission, European Parliament, Council, and several memberstate governments (e.g., France, Belgium, Netherlands) over security concerns.[13][14]
X (Twitter) EU
- Fines: as of early 2026, **no major confirmed EUlevel fine in the multihundredmillion range**, but X is under multiple formal DSA investigations.[13]
- Nonmonetary: designated a "Very Large Online Platform"; subject to extensive DSA obligations. The Commission has opened formal proceedings for alleged failures on illegal content, disinformation, and transparency and has publicly stated that serious noncompliance can lead to **feature limits or temporary service suspension in the EU**.[13]
Clearview AI EU + UK
- Fines:
- Italy: **20million** GDPR fine.[6]
- Greece: **20million** GDPR fine.[6]
- UK ICO: about **7.5million** (~8.75million) fine.[6][7]
- Nonmonetary: orders to delete EU/UK residents' data and to stop processing/scraping biometric data for those jurisdictions.[6]
Malibu said:Maroon Dawn said:Malibu said:Ag87H2O said:
"... collective governance gives way to "relentless" competition ..."
Spoken like a true Socialist. So wrong in so may ways. America became what it is precisely because we didn't follow the European model
It also became the way it is because we wrote the rules of law and people trusted us and did business with us because we followed those rules. Now were opting out of those rules and wishcasting the chart still goes up and to the right.
Your fellow socialists are terrified that they might have to put more money into defense than socialism and are throwing a temperate to keep US subsidizing them
No, I'm terrified that blowing the international order that we built to take a glacial landmass we already have military and economic access to will lead a worthless dollar and substantially higher borrowing costs. You know, things that make capitalism a lot harder. But hey, keep beating the drum that this is just Marxists malcontents that would celebrate terrorists killing Americans, and ignore the economic data and real world playing out right now. Everyone can see what a serious political analyst you are, as good as you are at football analysis.
Maroon Dawn said:Malibu said:Maroon Dawn said:Malibu said:Ag87H2O said:
"... collective governance gives way to "relentless" competition ..."
Spoken like a true Socialist. So wrong in so may ways. America became what it is precisely because we didn't follow the European model
It also became the way it is because we wrote the rules of law and people trusted us and did business with us because we followed those rules. Now were opting out of those rules and wishcasting the chart still goes up and to the right.
Your fellow socialists are terrified that they might have to put more money into defense than socialism and are throwing a temperate to keep US subsidizing them
No, I'm terrified that blowing the international order that we built to take a glacial landmass we already have military and economic access to will lead a worthless dollar and substantially higher borrowing costs. You know, things that make capitalism a lot harder. But hey, keep beating the drum that this is just Marxists malcontents that would celebrate terrorists killing Americans, and ignore the economic data and real world playing out right now. Everyone can see what a serious political analyst you are, as good as you are at football analysis.
You're so busy playing goalie for your fellow Marxists you refuse to question WHY they are throwing a temper tantrum over greater US defense presence on what's an essentially worthless ice sheet
The only answer is what I said. They are TERRIFIED of greater US security from Russia leading to less subsidizing of their welfare state through defense there is no other actual explanation
Quote:
Just days after mortgage rates hit a three-year low, sparking a near-instant surge in applications, fresh trade tensions are threatening to undo that progress.
Rates on a 30-year mortgage jumped 14 basis points to an average of 6.21% on Tuesday morning, according to Mortgage News Daily, following new escalations in the standoff between President Trump and European leaders over the future of Greenland.
Trump: "We're also the most secure. As an example, Iceland, without tariffs they wouldn't even be talking to us about it. So we'll see what happens." pic.twitter.com/YTB5xUH3vA
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) January 20, 2026
Maroon Dawn said:Malibu said:Maroon Dawn said:Malibu said:Ag87H2O said:
"... collective governance gives way to "relentless" competition ..."
Spoken like a true Socialist. So wrong in so may ways. America became what it is precisely because we didn't follow the European model
It also became the way it is because we wrote the rules of law and people trusted us and did business with us because we followed those rules. Now were opting out of those rules and wishcasting the chart still goes up and to the right.
Your fellow socialists are terrified that they might have to put more money into defense than socialism and are throwing a temperate to keep US subsidizing them
No, I'm terrified that blowing the international order that we built to take a glacial landmass we already have military and economic access to will lead a worthless dollar and substantially higher borrowing costs. You know, things that make capitalism a lot harder. But hey, keep beating the drum that this is just Marxists malcontents that would celebrate terrorists killing Americans, and ignore the economic data and real world playing out right now. Everyone can see what a serious political analyst you are, as good as you are at football analysis.
You're so busy playing goalie for your fellow Marxists you refuse to question WHY they are throwing a temper tantrum over greater US defense presence on what's an essentially worthless ice sheet
The only answer is what I said. They are TERRIFIED of greater US security from Russia leading to less subsidizing of their welfare state through defense there is no other actual explanation
Malibu said:Maroon Dawn said:Malibu said:Maroon Dawn said:Malibu said:Ag87H2O said:
"... collective governance gives way to "relentless" competition ..."
Spoken like a true Socialist. So wrong in so may ways. America became what it is precisely because we didn't follow the European model
It also became the way it is because we wrote the rules of law and people trusted us and did business with us because we followed those rules. Now were opting out of those rules and wishcasting the chart still goes up and to the right.
Your fellow socialists are terrified that they might have to put more money into defense than socialism and are throwing a temperate to keep US subsidizing them
No, I'm terrified that blowing the international order that we built to take a glacial landmass we already have military and economic access to will lead a worthless dollar and substantially higher borrowing costs. You know, things that make capitalism a lot harder. But hey, keep beating the drum that this is just Marxists malcontents that would celebrate terrorists killing Americans, and ignore the economic data and real world playing out right now. Everyone can see what a serious political analyst you are, as good as you are at football analysis.
You're so busy playing goalie for your fellow Marxists you refuse to question WHY they are throwing a temper tantrum over greater US defense presence on what's an essentially worthless ice sheet
The only answer is what I said. They are TERRIFIED of greater US security from Russia leading to less subsidizing of their welfare state through defense there is no other actual explanation
You've reframed the argument as greater US security in Greenland (no one is opposed to this) from what it actually is, economic coercion and refusing to rule out use of force to take possession of Greenland. Once you're up to speed on what this thread is actually about, you can try again to make a different argument to support your foregone conclusion that I am a terrorist supporting communist.
Maroon Dawn said:Malibu said:Maroon Dawn said:Malibu said:Maroon Dawn said:Malibu said:Ag87H2O said:
"... collective governance gives way to "relentless" competition ..."
Spoken like a true Socialist. So wrong in so may ways. America became what it is precisely because we didn't follow the European model
It also became the way it is because we wrote the rules of law and people trusted us and did business with us because we followed those rules. Now were opting out of those rules and wishcasting the chart still goes up and to the right.
Your fellow socialists are terrified that they might have to put more money into defense than socialism and are throwing a temperate to keep US subsidizing them
No, I'm terrified that blowing the international order that we built to take a glacial landmass we already have military and economic access to will lead a worthless dollar and substantially higher borrowing costs. You know, things that make capitalism a lot harder. But hey, keep beating the drum that this is just Marxists malcontents that would celebrate terrorists killing Americans, and ignore the economic data and real world playing out right now. Everyone can see what a serious political analyst you are, as good as you are at football analysis.
You're so busy playing goalie for your fellow Marxists you refuse to question WHY they are throwing a temper tantrum over greater US defense presence on what's an essentially worthless ice sheet
The only answer is what I said. They are TERRIFIED of greater US security from Russia leading to less subsidizing of their welfare state through defense there is no other actual explanation
You've reframed the argument as greater US security in Greenland (no one is opposed to this) from what it actually is, economic coercion and refusing to rule out use of force to take possession of Greenland. Once you're up to speed on what this thread is actually about, you can try again to make a different argument to support your foregone conclusion that I am a terrorist supporting communist.
Oh look you're doing that Leftist lying thing again
"He refused to rule out force"
Have you refused to rule out that you won't plant a bomb at the capital?
No?!??? Terrorist!!!!
That's how you're terrible leftist tactic works and no one is buying it
Malibu said:Maroon Dawn said:Malibu said:Maroon Dawn said:Malibu said:Maroon Dawn said:Malibu said:Ag87H2O said:
"... collective governance gives way to "relentless" competition ..."
Spoken like a true Socialist. So wrong in so may ways. America became what it is precisely because we didn't follow the European model
It also became the way it is because we wrote the rules of law and people trusted us and did business with us because we followed those rules. Now were opting out of those rules and wishcasting the chart still goes up and to the right.
Your fellow socialists are terrified that they might have to put more money into defense than socialism and are throwing a temperate to keep US subsidizing them
No, I'm terrified that blowing the international order that we built to take a glacial landmass we already have military and economic access to will lead a worthless dollar and substantially higher borrowing costs. You know, things that make capitalism a lot harder. But hey, keep beating the drum that this is just Marxists malcontents that would celebrate terrorists killing Americans, and ignore the economic data and real world playing out right now. Everyone can see what a serious political analyst you are, as good as you are at football analysis.
You're so busy playing goalie for your fellow Marxists you refuse to question WHY they are throwing a temper tantrum over greater US defense presence on what's an essentially worthless ice sheet
The only answer is what I said. They are TERRIFIED of greater US security from Russia leading to less subsidizing of their welfare state through defense there is no other actual explanation
You've reframed the argument as greater US security in Greenland (no one is opposed to this) from what it actually is, economic coercion and refusing to rule out use of force to take possession of Greenland. Once you're up to speed on what this thread is actually about, you can try again to make a different argument to support your foregone conclusion that I am a terrorist supporting communist.
Oh look you're doing that Leftist lying thing again
"He refused to rule out force"
Have you refused to rule out that you won't plant a bomb at the capital?
No?!??? Terrorist!!!!
That's how you're terrible leftist tactic works and no one is buying it
Trump was asked, directly, today, in a press conference to rule out force. He declined to do so. Since you're asking, hell yes I will rule out being a terrorist, are you out of your damned mind? Trump could have responded accordingly.
K2-HMFIC said:Maroon Dawn said:Malibu said:Maroon Dawn said:Malibu said:Ag87H2O said:
"... collective governance gives way to "relentless" competition ..."
Spoken like a true Socialist. So wrong in so may ways. America became what it is precisely because we didn't follow the European model
It also became the way it is because we wrote the rules of law and people trusted us and did business with us because we followed those rules. Now were opting out of those rules and wishcasting the chart still goes up and to the right.
Your fellow socialists are terrified that they might have to put more money into defense than socialism and are throwing a temperate to keep US subsidizing them
No, I'm terrified that blowing the international order that we built to take a glacial landmass we already have military and economic access to will lead a worthless dollar and substantially higher borrowing costs. You know, things that make capitalism a lot harder. But hey, keep beating the drum that this is just Marxists malcontents that would celebrate terrorists killing Americans, and ignore the economic data and real world playing out right now. Everyone can see what a serious political analyst you are, as good as you are at football analysis.
You're so busy playing goalie for your fellow Marxists you refuse to question WHY they are throwing a temper tantrum over greater US defense presence on what's an essentially worthless ice sheet
The only answer is what I said. They are TERRIFIED of greater US security from Russia leading to less subsidizing of their welfare state through defense there is no other actual explanation
Marxism…you keep using that word…
I don't think it means what you think it means.
Maroon Dawn said:Malibu said:Maroon Dawn said:Malibu said:Maroon Dawn said:Malibu said:Maroon Dawn said:Malibu said:Ag87H2O said:
"... collective governance gives way to "relentless" competition ..."
Spoken like a true Socialist. So wrong in so may ways. America became what it is precisely because we didn't follow the European model
It also became the way it is because we wrote the rules of law and people trusted us and did business with us because we followed those rules. Now were opting out of those rules and wishcasting the chart still goes up and to the right.
Your fellow socialists are terrified that they might have to put more money into defense than socialism and are throwing a temperate to keep US subsidizing them
No, I'm terrified that blowing the international order that we built to take a glacial landmass we already have military and economic access to will lead a worthless dollar and substantially higher borrowing costs. You know, things that make capitalism a lot harder. But hey, keep beating the drum that this is just Marxists malcontents that would celebrate terrorists killing Americans, and ignore the economic data and real world playing out right now. Everyone can see what a serious political analyst you are, as good as you are at football analysis.
You're so busy playing goalie for your fellow Marxists you refuse to question WHY they are throwing a temper tantrum over greater US defense presence on what's an essentially worthless ice sheet
The only answer is what I said. They are TERRIFIED of greater US security from Russia leading to less subsidizing of their welfare state through defense there is no other actual explanation
You've reframed the argument as greater US security in Greenland (no one is opposed to this) from what it actually is, economic coercion and refusing to rule out use of force to take possession of Greenland. Once you're up to speed on what this thread is actually about, you can try again to make a different argument to support your foregone conclusion that I am a terrorist supporting communist.
Oh look you're doing that Leftist lying thing again
"He refused to rule out force"
Have you refused to rule out that you won't plant a bomb at the capital?
No?!??? Terrorist!!!!
That's how you're terrible leftist tactic works and no one is buying it
Trump was asked, directly, today, in a press conference to rule out force. He declined to do so. Since you're asking, hell yes I will rule out being a terrorist, are you out of your damned mind? Trump could have responded accordingly.
He refused to rise to a leftist reporter bait trap of "when did you stop beating your wife" and it's proof Malibu will soon be deported a Greenland gulag after the occupation
Do you ever listen to yourself and the nonsense you allow yourself to believe in defense of Leftism?
Malibu said:Maroon Dawn said:Malibu said:Maroon Dawn said:Malibu said:Maroon Dawn said:Malibu said:Ag87H2O said:
"... collective governance gives way to "relentless" competition ..."
Spoken like a true Socialist. So wrong in so may ways. America became what it is precisely because we didn't follow the European model
It also became the way it is because we wrote the rules of law and people trusted us and did business with us because we followed those rules. Now were opting out of those rules and wishcasting the chart still goes up and to the right.
Your fellow socialists are terrified that they might have to put more money into defense than socialism and are throwing a temperate to keep US subsidizing them
No, I'm terrified that blowing the international order that we built to take a glacial landmass we already have military and economic access to will lead a worthless dollar and substantially higher borrowing costs. You know, things that make capitalism a lot harder. But hey, keep beating the drum that this is just Marxists malcontents that would celebrate terrorists killing Americans, and ignore the economic data and real world playing out right now. Everyone can see what a serious political analyst you are, as good as you are at football analysis.
You're so busy playing goalie for your fellow Marxists you refuse to question WHY they are throwing a temper tantrum over greater US defense presence on what's an essentially worthless ice sheet
The only answer is what I said. They are TERRIFIED of greater US security from Russia leading to less subsidizing of their welfare state through defense there is no other actual explanation
You've reframed the argument as greater US security in Greenland (no one is opposed to this) from what it actually is, economic coercion and refusing to rule out use of force to take possession of Greenland. Once you're up to speed on what this thread is actually about, you can try again to make a different argument to support your foregone conclusion that I am a terrorist supporting communist.
Oh look you're doing that Leftist lying thing again
"He refused to rule out force"
Have you refused to rule out that you won't plant a bomb at the capital?
No?!??? Terrorist!!!!
That's how you're terrible leftist tactic works and no one is buying it
Trump was asked, directly, today, in a press conference to rule out force. He declined to do so. Since you're asking, hell yes I will rule out being a terrorist, are you out of your damned mind? Trump could have responded accordingly.
Bessent: Markets are going down because Japan's bond market just suffered a six-standard-deviation move in ten-year bonds over the past two days... This has nothign to do with Greenland. pic.twitter.com/i1JVNR4vWw
— unusual_whales (@unusual_whales) January 20, 2026
ETFan said:Maroon Dawn said:Malibu said:Maroon Dawn said:Malibu said:Maroon Dawn said:Malibu said:Maroon Dawn said:Malibu said:Ag87H2O said:
"... collective governance gives way to "relentless" competition ..."
Spoken like a true Socialist. So wrong in so may ways. America became what it is precisely because we didn't follow the European model
It also became the way it is because we wrote the rules of law and people trusted us and did business with us because we followed those rules. Now were opting out of those rules and wishcasting the chart still goes up and to the right.
Your fellow socialists are terrified that they might have to put more money into defense than socialism and are throwing a temperate to keep US subsidizing them
No, I'm terrified that blowing the international order that we built to take a glacial landmass we already have military and economic access to will lead a worthless dollar and substantially higher borrowing costs. You know, things that make capitalism a lot harder. But hey, keep beating the drum that this is just Marxists malcontents that would celebrate terrorists killing Americans, and ignore the economic data and real world playing out right now. Everyone can see what a serious political analyst you are, as good as you are at football analysis.
You're so busy playing goalie for your fellow Marxists you refuse to question WHY they are throwing a temper tantrum over greater US defense presence on what's an essentially worthless ice sheet
The only answer is what I said. They are TERRIFIED of greater US security from Russia leading to less subsidizing of their welfare state through defense there is no other actual explanation
You've reframed the argument as greater US security in Greenland (no one is opposed to this) from what it actually is, economic coercion and refusing to rule out use of force to take possession of Greenland. Once you're up to speed on what this thread is actually about, you can try again to make a different argument to support your foregone conclusion that I am a terrorist supporting communist.
Oh look you're doing that Leftist lying thing again
"He refused to rule out force"
Have you refused to rule out that you won't plant a bomb at the capital?
No?!??? Terrorist!!!!
That's how you're terrible leftist tactic works and no one is buying it
Trump was asked, directly, today, in a press conference to rule out force. He declined to do so. Since you're asking, hell yes I will rule out being a terrorist, are you out of your damned mind? Trump could have responded accordingly.
He refused to rise to a leftist reporter bait trap of "when did you stop beating your wife" and it's proof Malibu will soon be deported a Greenland gulag after the occupation
Do you ever listen to yourself and the nonsense you allow yourself to believe in defense of Leftism?
The only answer is no. This is defense of America, has nothing to do with left or right. What the hell is going on...
YouBet said:
Addition to 1 - Keir Starmer is trying to get the Big 3 countries over there to ban X because it's the only social media platform out there that isn't regulated in favor of far-left wing propaganda.
Western Europe, for all of their concern over Trump blowing up the Western world, is every bit as much to blame here. But, as usual, the left will never take accountability for anything that they do.
