Minneapolis getting Hot?

214,249 Views | 2757 Replies | Last: 16 sec ago by oh no
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:13p, 1/9/26
AG
Wait, what? Anyone else seeing this around?

Reply Quote
14
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Who?mikejones! • 2:13p, 1/9/26
AG
Who?mikejones! said:
I've been listening to npr today. Frst time post defunding.

All ive heard about is a mother being rudely killed by aggressive ice agents.

Nothing about her role as an activist
Nothing abiut her history

Simply, mother.

She's the new "Maryland man"...
You can turn off signatures, btw
Reply Quote
10
samurai_science
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 2:14p, 1/9/26
aggiehawg said:
Quote:
What officer told her to get out of there? The only one telling her to get out of there was her wife.

Silver truck with lights pulls up, stops, agent in uniform gets out approaching the driver's door. Granted it was inartfully phrased but "Get out of the effing car!" seems pretty direct to me.

Is that somehow unclear to you?

4 times he yelled it
Reply Quote
9
Rapier108
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 2:15p, 1/9/26
aggiehawg said:
Wait, what? Anyone else seeing this around?


I'd want something more to back that up. 0hour1 isn't the most reputable source on Twitter. Like all clickbaiters, he'll post accurate stuff, but then a lot of BS as well.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Reply Quote
5
Who?mikejones!
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to [removed post] • 2:15p, 1/9/26
He wont see a trial
Reply Quote
3
SwigAg11
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 2:15p, 1/9/26
AG
I thought I had seen that was some time in the past, not within the last few days.
Reply Quote
KentK93
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rapier108 • 2:15p, 1/9/26
AG
Rapier108 said:
KentK93 said:
Sims said:
StandUpforAmerica said:
TAMUallen said:
What will be the new talking points with this video being released?

A) will completely ignore the "get out of the car" repeated orders
B) will completely focus on how is a murderous barbarian for saying "****ing *****"

Here's your answer...


I've said worse when I stubbed my toe. If I was going to extrapolate my reaction, I would say the officer was quite restrained in his followup soliloquy

MSNOW was mad about the language at the end & found an expert to brush away that Good disobeyed orders & that the ICE officer was hit.

Yep, that is their newest talking point, he use bad words.

He must not be ex-military because it would have been something like "****ing dumb c*** F***!"
Reply Quote
4
Kozmozag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:15p, 1/9/26
Now watch as they protest and burn m/sp to the ground again.
Reply Quote
4
jsc8116
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 2:15p, 1/9/26
AG
The local DA can go home and cry to her wife about it and then go watch reruns of a WNBA game together.
Reply Quote
5
Who?mikejones!
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:16p, 1/9/26
The lwft is cliaming she was dropping off her girlfriend/spouse

I know when I go to drop off someone at the curb, I always back in perpendicular to the curb and make sure my vehicle is sticking out in the road way.
Reply Quote
9
tylercsbn9
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 2:17p, 1/9/26
AG
aggiehawg said:
Quote:
What officer told her to get out of there? The only one telling her to get out of there was her wife.

Silver truck with lights pulls up, stops, agent in uniform gets out approaching the driver's door. Granted it was inartfully phrased but "Get out of the effing car!" seems pretty direct to me.

Is that somehow unclear to you?

By get out of there I meant get out of the area....not the car. The person I was responding to said she was following orders because she was trying to leave ie get out of there (the area),
Reply Quote
2
1 edit
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to [removed post] • 2:17p, 1/9/26
AG
94DCAg said:
I view her as complying with the order to get out of there and CLEARLY trying to turn the car away from them.


You want to see what you want to see. That's why we have juries, voire dire, trials. I hope he sees a trial.

The order was to GET OUT OF THE CAR...

Police don't try to open your door when they're wanting you to leave...



You can turn off signatures, btw
Reply Quote
25
Rapier108
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Kozmozag • 2:18p, 1/9/26
Kozmozag said:
Now watch as they protest and burn m/sp to the ground again.

Let it burn.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Reply Quote
2
samurai_science
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rapier108 • 2:18p, 1/9/26
Rapier108 said:
Kozmozag said:
Now watch as they protest and burn m/sp to the ground again.

Let it burn.

Exactly, thats what we want
Reply Quote
5
Kenneth_2003
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to [removed post] • 2:19p, 1/9/26
AG
94DCAg said:
I view her as complying with the order to get out of there and CLEARLY trying to turn the car away from them.


You want to see what you want to see. That's why we have juries, voire dire, trials. I hope he sees a trial.

The problem with your take here though... The time for her to leave of her own free will had passed. The orders she was being given were to "Get out of the car!" They were not to "Get out [of here]!" Once a cop reaches for your door handle to open your door, his next move is to remove you from your car seat.

She was NOT trying to simply leave the scene. At that point, that would be evading arrest. She spent the day FA'ing. She was about to Felony FO! But instead she short cut it FO Dead.
Reply Quote
13
samurai_science
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ag with kids • 2:19p, 1/9/26
Ag with kids said:
94DCAg said:
I view her as complying with the order to get out of there and CLEARLY trying to turn the car away from them.


You want to see what you want to see. That's why we have juries, voire dire, trials. I hope he sees a trial.

The order was to GET OUT OF THE CAR...

Police don't try to open your door when they're wanting you to leave...




The poster you are quoting is a confirmed troll.
Reply Quote
15
captkirk
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jacketman03 • 2:19p, 1/9/26
AG
jacketman03 said:
samurai_science said:
jacketman03 said:
StandUpforAmerica said:
We need some sort of separate thread for

****** official stupid liberal white women ************



So, is following ICE agents around and honking your horn against the law? If so, I'd sure like to see those statutes.

Blocking Traffic including federal cars,
Interfering in ICE Operations,
Running Red Lights and Stop Signs,
Speeding


Shall I continue?

There are federal laws regarding blocking traffic, running red lights, and speeding?

seems appropriate here

Reply Quote
32
captkirk
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to EFR • 2:20p, 1/9/26
AG
EFR said:
Honking and blowing whistles is absolutely NOT illegal even if "alerts the target". It is protected free speech. A good example is that the texas statute on interference clearly states it has to be more than speech to be interference.

Nobody got shot for that
Reply Quote
13
fatdad84ag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to EFR • 2:21p, 1/9/26
AG
EFR said:
Honking and blowing whistles is absolutely NOT illegal even if "alerts the target". It is protected free speech. A good example is that the texas statute on interference clearly states it has to be more than speech to be interference.

Texas law (Transportation Code 547.501) makes it illegal to continuously or unnecessarily honk your horn; it should only be used as an audible warning for safety, to ensure safe operation, not for frustration, intimidation, or celebration, and must not be unreasonably loud or harsh. Excessive or malicious honking, especially when not for imminent danger, can lead to tickets for violating noise ordinances or for harassment.
Reply Quote
10
Kenneth_2003
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to samurai_science • 2:21p, 1/9/26
AG
samurai_science said:
aggiehawg said:
Quote:
What officer told her to get out of there? The only one telling her to get out of there was her wife.

Silver truck with lights pulls up, stops, agent in uniform gets out approaching the driver's door. Granted it was inartfully phrased but "Get out of the effing car!" seems pretty direct to me.

Is that somehow unclear to you?

4 times he yelled it

IF that door had been unlocked he was about to remove her from that vehicle himself. She was headed for Felony interfering with the duties of a Federal Agent.
Reply Quote
9
Post removed:
by user
2:21p, 1/9/26
Who?mikejones!
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to captkirk • 2:22p, 1/9/26
captkirk said:
EFR said:
Honking and blowing whistles is absolutely NOT illegal even if "alerts the target". It is protected free speech. A good example is that the texas statute on interference clearly states it has to be more than speech to be interference.

Nobody got shot for that


Blue star. That's the core of the matter. She wasnt shot for honking, obstruction or being a pain in the ass.

She was shot for driving towards and hitting an leo with her vehicle
Reply Quote
27
1 edit
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to JFABNRGR • 2:23p, 1/9/26
AG
Not put too fine a point on this but the BCA, Bureau of Criminal Apprehensions, that she is talking about being denied access, well, they were the ones who screwed up the investigation of George Floyd's death. For one, they failed and outright refused to search and identify what was found in the back of the squad car where Floyd was fighting with the officers before being pulled out and subdued on the ground, per Floyd's request, BTW.

The BCA was finally forced by court order on the very eve of trial to conduct another search. That squad car had been in their custody since the early morning hours of the day after Floyd's death. A shoe, multiple pills with Floyd's saliva were found on the rear floorboard during that much delayed search.

So BCA is not the trusted state agency she's pretending it is as they deliberately withhold exculpatory evidence, as they did with Chauvin.
Reply Quote
8
Zachary Klement
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to EFR • 2:24p, 1/9/26
AG
EFR said:
Honking and blowing whistles is absolutely NOT illegal even if "alerts the target". It is protected free speech. A good example is that the texas statute on interference clearly states it has to be more than speech to be interference.

Is trying to hit someone with your car illegal? Or is that also protected free speech? I don't recall covering that in First Amendment.
Reply Quote
14
Phatbob
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to [removed post] • 2:25p, 1/9/26
AG
94DCAg said:
I'm not here to convince anyone. You and those who have a very different perception would likely never get picked to be on a jury.

As a nation of laws, we should all demand a full assessment of the fact and ability for those harmed to see their day in court.

Sweeping immunity is a danger to us all. I hope you see that. If this was the Obama Administration and the driver was a White Supremist member, you'd expect a prudent investigation and court of law to weigh in.

You have literally nothing to back your position up except for generalizations. Details are not on your side, and the details are exactly what the law is about.
Reply Quote
18
J. Walter Weatherman
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to [removed post] • 2:25p, 1/9/26
94DCAg said:
I'm not here to convince anyone. You and those who have a very different perception would likely never get picked to be on a jury.

As a nation of laws, we should all demand a full assessment of the fact and ability for those harmed to see their day in court.

Sweeping immunity is a danger to us all. I hope you see that. If this was the Obama Administration and the driver was a White Supremist member, you'd expect a prudent investigation and court of law to weigh in.


Not if there's a video showing, without a doubt, that the white "supremist" was trying to run over a federal agent.
Reply Quote
14
Who?mikejones!
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Who?mikejones! • 2:25p, 1/9/26
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
usmcbrooks
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to [removed post] • 2:26p, 1/9/26
94DCAg said:
I'm not here to convince anyone. You and those who have a very different perception would likely never get picked to be on a jury.

As a nation of laws, we should all demand a full assessment of the fact and ability for those harmed to see their day in court.

Sweeping immunity is a danger to us all. I hope you see that. If this was the Obama Administration and the driver was a White Supremist member, you'd expect a prudent investigation and court of law to weigh in.

Reply Quote
5
samurai_science
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to [removed post] • 2:26p, 1/9/26
94DCAg said:
I'm not here to convince anyone. You and those who have a very different perception would likely never get picked to be on a jury.

As a nation of laws, we should all demand a full assessment of the fact and ability for those harmed to see their day in court.

Sweeping immunity is a danger to us all. I hope you see that. If this was the Obama Administration and the driver was a White Supremist member, you'd expect a prudent investigation and court of law to weigh in.

  • Fallacious Hypotheticals: Used to replace evidence or make unfounded claims about what would happen if things were different, leading to an unsound argument.
Reply Quote
16
1 edit
Kenneth_2003
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to fatdad84ag • 2:27p, 1/9/26
AG
fatdad84ag said:
EFR said:
Honking and blowing whistles is absolutely NOT illegal even if "alerts the target". It is protected free speech. A good example is that the texas statute on interference clearly states it has to be more than speech to be interference.

Texas law (Transportation Code 547.501) makes it illegal to continuously or unnecessarily honk your horn; it should only be used as an audible warning for safety, to ensure safe operation, not for frustration, intimidation, or celebration, and must not be unreasonably loud or harsh. Excessive or malicious honking, especially when not for imminent danger, can lead to tickets for violating noise ordinances or for harassment.

When you tap-dance the day away on the cliff's edge you don't get to cry when the rocks ultimately give way.

This woman spent the entire day (from what I've heard, obviously no personal first hand knowledge) on the very legal edge of interfering with these officers/agents official and legal duties. We all know they were absolutely sick of her nonsense and had probably already and repeatedly shown more grace/mercy than she was deserved. So once they were well and fully sick of her nonsense she wasn't going to get any grace or reprieve, and with ample evidence from throughout the day (her own cell phone probably holds the evidence of her guilt here).
Reply Quote
9
Who?mikejones!
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to [removed post] • 2:27p, 1/9/26
94DCAg said:
I'm not here to convince anyone. You and those who have a very different perception would likely never get picked to be on a jury.

As a nation of laws, we should all demand a full assessment of the fact and ability for those harmed to see their day in court.

Sweeping immunity is a danger to us all. I hope you see that. If this was the Obama Administration and the driver was a White Supremist member, you'd expect a prudent investigation and court of law to weigh in.


You clearly dont follow many of the leo shooting threads that pop up here
Reply Quote
8
1 edit
G Martin 87
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to riverrataggie • 2:27p, 1/9/26
AG
riverrataggie said:
Who?mikejones! said:
I've been listening to npr today. Frst time post defunding.

All ive heard about is a mother being rudely killed by aggressive ice agents.

Nothing about her role as an activist
Nothing abiut her history

Simply, mother.


Without federal funding, expect npr to up the rhetoric now even more.

Reply Quote
captkirk
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Phatbob • 2:27p, 1/9/26
AG
Phatbob said:
94DCAg said:
I view her as complying with the order to get out of there and CLEARLY trying to turn the car away from them.


You want to see what you want to see. That's why we have juries, voire dire, trials. I hope he sees a trial.

She was complying with her girlfriends screams to get out of there, which is technically not a legal order. She was disobeying the orders by the officers to get out of the car. That is called evading arrest. Hitting an officer with your car is called assault of an officer with a deadly weapon.

Even if the order was from another "legal observer"?
Reply Quote
3
1 edit
Slicer97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to [removed post] • 2:27p, 1/9/26
AG
94DCAg said:
I'm not here to convince anyone. You and those who have a very different perception would likely never get picked to be on a jury.

As a nation of laws, we should all demand a full assessment of the fact and ability for those harmed to see their day in court.

Sweeping immunity is a danger to us all. I hope you see that. If this was the Obama Administration and the driver was a White Supremist member, you'd expect a prudent investigation and court of law to weigh in.


Not if the white supremist driver deliberately rammed the federal LEO with their vehicle. I'd expect the driver to get unalived and for it to be billed as a clean shoot.
Reply Quote
8
Gaeilge
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:28p, 1/9/26
Just wanted to let everyone know that I found out the dog is fine!!
Reply Quote
21
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.