Minneapolis getting Hot?

260,544 Views | 3210 Replies | Last: 25 min ago by agracer
Old Army Ghost
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aggie4Christ09 • 11:41a, 1/10/26
Aggie4Christ09 said:
captkirk said:


The guy wasn't even close to getting hit and also stepped in front of the car very late. Also he stepped in front of the car when a very large man grabs the handle and is screaming "FET THE **** OUT OF THE CAR"

I don't know what my wife would do in that situation, but under normal law, you need probable cause and some sort of discussion.

You know, the law. Imagine if that was your wife. That is an incredibly stressful situation.

These are situations law enforcement is supposed to deescalate, this is not a life and death situation.

Simple as that. An innocent AMERICAN died today.
how you feeling now about this poor scared wife given all the videos of her and her friend attacking the police
Old Army has gone to hell.
Reply Quote
17
Maroon Dawn
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:50a, 1/10/26
AG
Dear Libs:

Let's say you are right and somehow all these videos of her car making contact with him are false.

The act itself of gunning a vehicle (and you can see the speed of it accelerating away) in the direction of a LEO giving him only a fraction of a second to react then yeah if he decides that his life is being threatened and reacts accordingly with deadly force then 30 years case law says he's in the right and didn't have to wait and see if the vehicle makes contact to respond.

Its the same principal of a perp drawing a gun. LEOs don't have to wait to see if they actually intend to fire it at them or anyone else. They are allowed to simply shoot you first to prevent a POTENTIAL act of violence against them or someone else.

This lady died because she intentionally interfered in LEO investigations, refused to follow lawful commands from LEOs and then tried to flee arrest by LEOs. Her blood is on the hands of all idiot leftists who told her these choices were the right thing to do
Reply Quote
25
1 edit
richardag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 94chem • 11:51a, 1/10/26
94chem said:
Wildmen03 said:
94chem said:
TAMUallen said:
Who?mikejones! said:
For the billionth time, it doesnt matter if she was "steering" away from the officer. He cannot read her mind.

She hit him. That's assault brother.


And we now know she saw him too. Bleeping beep


https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c394vjz9w1dt?post=asset%3Aa0574fda-12af-405d-ba00-a5f40f043b65#post

100% irrelevant. She's on video conversing with the officer right up to the point she hit him with his car.


She didn't hit him. I don't know how that's irrelevant. The grainy footage shot from a distance is an optical illusion. The 3 minute video at the link shows this in detail. Only an Auburn basketball fan could call this irrelevant.

The video link to below pantently shows the vehicle hitting the ice officer. You need to stop saying the vehicle didn't hit him.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Reply Quote
8
Old Army Ghost
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 94chem • 11:55a, 1/10/26
94chem said:
Wildmen03 said:
94chem said:
TAMUallen said:
Who?mikejones! said:
For the billionth time, it doesnt matter if she was "steering" away from the officer. He cannot read her mind.

She hit him. That's assault brother.


And we now know she saw him too. Bleeping beep


https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c394vjz9w1dt?post=asset%3Aa0574fda-12af-405d-ba00-a5f40f043b65#post

100% irrelevant. She's on video conversing with the officer right up to the point she hit him with his car.


She didn't hit him. I don't know how that's irrelevant. The grainy footage shot from a distance is an optical illusion. The 3 minute video at the link shows this in detail. Only an Auburn basketball fan could call this irrelevant.
the lefts Big Lie

tHe CaR dIdNt HiT hIm AnD yOuR eYeS aRe LyInG!!!1!
Old Army has gone to hell.
Reply Quote
20
MemphisAg1
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to richardag • 11:56a, 1/10/26
AG
richardag said:
94chem said:
She didn't hit him. I don't know how that's irrelevant. The grainy footage shot from a distance is an optical illusion. The 3 minute video at the link shows this in detail. Only an Auburn basketball fan could call this irrelevant.

The video link to below pantently shows the vehicle hitting the ice officer. You need to stop saying the vehicle didn't hit him.

Yep, it's a bold-faced lie for anyone to say the vehicle didn't hit the officer when it's right there on video for the entire world to see.

How deranged must one be to reject what their eyes see and create a false narrative instead?
Reply Quote
22
1 edit
Old Sarge
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to YouBet • 12:10p, 1/10/26
AG
YouBet said:
TresPuertas said:
94chem said:
Wildmen03 said:
94chem said:
TAMUallen said:
Who?mikejones! said:
For the billionth time, it doesnt matter if she was "steering" away from the officer. He cannot read her mind.

She hit him. That's assault brother.


And we now know she saw him too. Bleeping beep


https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c394vjz9w1dt?post=asset%3Aa0574fda-12af-405d-ba00-a5f40f043b65#post

100% irrelevant. She's on video conversing with the officer right up to the point she hit him with his car.


She didn't hit him. I don't know how that's irrelevant. The grainy footage shot from a distance is an optical illusion. The 3 minute video at the link shows this in detail. Only an Auburn basketball fan could call this irrelevant.


This response is so insane I honestly don't know if it's heavy sarcasm or complete and total detachment from reality


If that's what he believes, this is why you can no longer compromise with Democrats. We live in two different spaces. We live in reality and they live in fantasy.

There is no reconciling or compromising on anything when you can't agree on basic facts and reality.

This goes back to "you can be anything you want to be" the DemocRats have been spouting for over two decades. Anyone with a brain knows a person is not a dog, but they believe that someone can be, if that is their truth. No more than chopping your dick off and having someone cut a giant wound in your 'taint makes a man a woman, but it is their truth that YOU must overwhelming support or YOU are the one in the wrong. Still ain't a woman, and those are facts. So, this is how people like 94Chem can say things like this and patently believe them, even though video shows their eyes exactly what happened, it's just not "their" truth.

This is how the DemocRats spout lies and reinforce beliefs not founded in the truth, and gullible Useful Idiots lap it up, and turn around and spout out the same non-truths, reinforcing others incorrect "truths".

Fake, and dangerous.
"Green" is the new RED.
Reply Quote
6
TrumpsBarber
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Logos Stick • 12:21p, 1/10/26
Logos Stick said:
YouBet said:
TresPuertas said:
94chem said:
Wildmen03 said:
94chem said:
TAMUallen said:
Who?mikejones! said:
For the billionth time, it doesnt matter if she was "steering" away from the officer. He cannot read her mind.

She hit him. That's assault brother.


And we now know she saw him too. Bleeping beep


https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c394vjz9w1dt?post=asset%3Aa0574fda-12af-405d-ba00-a5f40f043b65#post

100% irrelevant. She's on video conversing with the officer right up to the point she hit him with his car.


She didn't hit him. I don't know how that's irrelevant. The grainy footage shot from a distance is an optical illusion. The 3 minute video at the link shows this in detail. Only an Auburn basketball fan could call this irrelevant.


This response is so insane I honestly don't know if it's heavy sarcasm or complete and total detachment from reality


If that's what he believes, this is why you can no longer compromise with Democrats. We live in two different spaces. We live in reality and they live in fantasy.

There is no reconciling or compromising on anything when you can't agree on basic facts and reality.


They believe it. The left is delusional. They still believe Trump is Putins puppet. We are either going to have a peaceful divorce or bloodshed. That's where we are headed.

We got to the second option during the St. Floyd Riots in the summer of 2020. That was genuine insurrection and it never stopped.
Reply Quote
4
Who?mikejones!
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Old Army Ghost • 12:22p, 1/10/26
Old Army Ghost said:
94chem said:
Wildmen03 said:
94chem said:
TAMUallen said:
Who?mikejones! said:
For the billionth time, it doesnt matter if she was "steering" away from the officer. He cannot read her mind.

She hit him. That's assault brother.


And we now know she saw him too. Bleeping beep


https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c394vjz9w1dt?post=asset%3Aa0574fda-12af-405d-ba00-a5f40f043b65#post

100% irrelevant. She's on video conversing with the officer right up to the point she hit him with his car.


She didn't hit him. I don't know how that's irrelevant. The grainy footage shot from a distance is an optical illusion. The 3 minute video at the link shows this in detail. Only an Auburn basketball fan could call this irrelevant.
the lefts Big Lie

tHe CaR dIdNt HiT hIm AnD yOuR eYeS aRe LyInG!!!1!


Iirc, Old army ghost isnt a fan of the right. Is that right?
Reply Quote
2
1 edit
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to MemphisAg1 • 12:25p, 1/10/26
MemphisAg1 said:
richardag said:
94chem said:
She didn't hit him. I don't know how that's irrelevant. The grainy footage shot from a distance is an optical illusion. The 3 minute video at the link shows this in detail. Only an Auburn basketball fan could call this irrelevant.

The video link to below pantently shows the vehicle hitting the ice officer. You need to stop saying the vehicle didn't hit him.

Yep, it's a bold-faced lie for anyone to say the vehicle didn't hit the officer when it's right there on video for the entire world to see.

How deranged must one be to reject what their eyes see and create a false narrative instead?
They know.

There was a leftist "influencer" the other day whipping people into a frenzy online, but telling her followers not to watch the video because they didn't need to see it.
Reply Quote
4
TxAG#2011
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to richardag • 12:26p, 1/10/26
Why do ya'll keep trotting out the worst possible angle of it instead of the actual up close ones?

I know why, but don't you understand how dumb it looks? Apparently not
Reply Quote
2
Who?mikejones!
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:26p, 1/10/26
A video before the shooting. Clear that home girl was actively interfering with ice

Reply Quote
12
1 edit
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TxAG#2011 • 12:27p, 1/10/26
Why do leftists keep defending the indefensible?

The woman knowingly ran into the officer. She was somewhere she had no right to be, doing something she had no right to do, and she got herself killed. Stop defending it.
Reply Quote
23
2 edits
Who?mikejones!
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TxAG#2011 • 12:28p, 1/10/26
The close up ones show the same thing. The officer who was hit by the car is obstructed from view but you can clearly see his feet lifted off the ground in the close up ones as well.

Theres no angle which good didnt drive at and hit an ice officer. She signed her own death warrant the moment she decided to flee.
Reply Quote
10
1 edit
Logos Stick
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TxAG#2011 • 12:30p, 1/10/26
TxAG#2011 said:
Why do ya'll keep trotting out the worst possible angle of it instead of the actual up close ones?

I know why, but don't you understand how dumb it looks? Apparently not


Lol

It was a good kill.
Reply Quote
9
TxAG#2011
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ellis Wyatt • 12:30p, 1/10/26
Ellis Wyatt said:
Why did leftists keep defending the indefensible?

You know you don't have to bend over for everything that your team supports.

She was clearly not trying to run him over, but she also ****ed around and should have complied.

Trying to push some narrative about her purposefully trying to run him over is just so so cringe intelligence level.
Reply Quote
Logos Stick
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TxAG#2011 • 12:32p, 1/10/26
TxAG#2011 said:
Ellis Wyatt said:
Why did leftists keep defending the indefensible?

You know you don't have to bend over for everything that your team supports.

She was clearly not trying to run him over, but she also ****ed around and should have complied.

Trying to push some narrative about her purposefully trying to run him over is just so so cringe intelligence level.


Her intent is irrelevant.
Reply Quote
31
pacecar02
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:32p, 1/10/26
She lost custody of her two older children because her spouse is a convicted child abuser

they then fled to Canada after the election

couldn't hack it there

moved to Minneapolis

All funded through gofundme drives
Reply Quote
19
Aggieland Proud
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to pacecar02 • 12:35p, 1/10/26
AG
Was it former spouse that was convicted or the current "wife". Assuming the current?
Reply Quote
4
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TxAG#2011 • 12:36p, 1/10/26
I support the law. I support the people enforcing the law.

I don't support people harassing LEOs doing their jobs or people who physically assault LEOs, whether those people are using their bodies, weapons, or vehicles. I can't imagine defending such lawlessness and stupidity.

At least this woman won't get to hit another LEO with her vehicle.
Reply Quote
17
1 edit
Who?mikejones!
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TxAG#2011 • 12:38p, 1/10/26
TxAG#2011 said:
Ellis Wyatt said:
Why did leftists keep defending the indefensible?

You know you don't have to bend over for everything that your team supports.

She was clearly not trying to run him over, but she also ****ed around and should have complied.

Trying to push some narrative about her purposefully trying to run him over is just so so cringe intelligence level.


Her intent is irrelevant
Reply Quote
16
pacecar02
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:40p, 1/10/26
Reply Quote
11
pacecar02
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aggieland Proud • 12:41p, 1/10/26
current spouse

Reply Quote
3
YouBet
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to pacecar02 • 12:47p, 1/10/26
AG
pacecar02 said:
current spouse



Before I further judge her decision making skills, is there a link we can see on this?
Reply Quote
1
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TxAG#2011 • 12:50p, 1/10/26
AG
TxAG#2011 said:
Ellis Wyatt said:
Why did leftists keep defending the indefensible?

You know you don't have to bend over for everything that your team supports.

She was clearly not trying to run him over, but she also ****ed around and should have complied.

Trying to push some narrative about her purposefully trying to run him over is just so so cringe intelligence level.

Firing officer was not in front of the vehicle, to the right of it UNTIL she backed up and turned the wheel to put him in front and to the driver's side. She turns the wheel slightly, again towards him and hits the gas. Being a front wheel drive, the front tires can be seen spinning on the ice until they gain traction and she takes off, hitting the officer and only then does he fire.

Plus, as she was reversing, she nearly hit and dragged her wife who was trying to open the passenger door. Plus the officer at the driver's window had his arms on the window opening and also could have been knocked down on the icy road, dragged or otherwise injured. Firing in defense of oneself and/or others is justifiable homicide under excessive use of force principles applicable to LEOs.

There are no other angles that dispute what the car and the tires are doing. Anyone who has driven on ice, know the sound of tires spinning and the engine revving as they spin. Officer had both visual and auditory clues as to what was happening. And that it wasn't happening by accident.

Further, by federal statute, the state of MN does not have criminal jurisdiction here and thus excluding the BCA is what the law says.
Reply Quote
15
1 edit
samurai_science
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TxAG#2011 • 12:53p, 1/10/26
TxAG#2011 said:
Ellis Wyatt said:
Why did leftists keep defending the indefensible?

You know you don't have to bend over for everything that your team supports.

She was clearly not trying to run him over, but she also ****ed around and should have complied.

Trying to push some narrative about her purposefully trying to run him over is just so so cringe intelligence level.

Her intent is irrelevant and no one can know what it was anyway, even you. You are pushing a narrative that she was not trying to run him over, very cringe indeed.
Reply Quote
17
1 edit
samurai_science
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TxAG#2011 • 12:55p, 1/10/26
TxAG#2011 said:
Why do ya'll keep trotting out the worst possible angle of it instead of the actual up close ones?

I know why, but don't you understand how dumb it looks? Apparently not

The only angel that matters is the one from the point of view from the Federal officer who was almost killed by the progressive loser. He was actually the on one the ground
Reply Quote
10
aginlakeway
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TxAG#2011 • 1:02p, 1/10/26
AG
TxAG#2011 said:
Ellis Wyatt said:
Why did leftists keep defending the indefensible?

You know you don't have to bend over for everything that your team supports.

She was clearly not trying to run him over, but she also ****ed around and should have complied.

Trying to push some narrative about her purposefully trying to run him over is just so so cringe intelligence level.


Doesn't matter. It's what HE thought she was doing that matters.
One day at a time.
Reply Quote
9
pacecar02
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to YouBet • 1:08p, 1/10/26
YouBet said:
pacecar02 said:
current spouse



Before I further judge her decision making skills, is there a link we can see on this?

reading reports of Renee's ex wanting to stay off the record

he has custody of their kids

trying to find a non paywalled source
Reply Quote
1
B-1 83
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:11p, 1/10/26
AG
I have a poem for you, want to hear it? Here it goes:
Roses are red
ICE is cold
you won't get shot
if you do what you're told
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
Reply Quote
18
deddog
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ellis Wyatt • 1:14p, 1/10/26
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:
Why do leftists keep defending the indefensible?

The woman knowingly ran into the officer. She was somewhere she had no right to be, doing something she had no right to do, and she got herself killed. Stop defending it.

They're leftists.
Their IQ is below "sharp as a tack" Biden.
There's a reason Lenin called them useful idiots.

Plenty of evidence in this thread.
Reply Quote
7
lcraggie
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to pacecar02 • 1:15p, 1/10/26
AG
pacecar02 said:
She lost custody of her two older children because her spouse is a convicted child abuser

they then fled to Canada after the election

couldn't hack it there

moved to Minneapolis

All funded through gofundme drives

This is mean.

You should not let the inconvenient facts of this deranged woman's life interfere with the media, political and societal facts she was just dropping off her child. You are shaming her for breaking the law for interfering with federal police action. Stop changing the narrative on her media sponsored victimhood status with facts.

She deserves more than a closed casket funeral. She is dead and cannot see her full potential realized in her miserable life. At least in death she now achieves leftist sainthood.
Rangers Lead the Way, NSDQ


Reply Quote
2
1 edit
pacecar02
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to lcraggie • 1:19p, 1/10/26
It's what happened

how are facts mean?



Here is what I think is cruel.

The left is manipulating impressionable people into being chaos drones that they can deploy at the drop of the hat for whatever the cause de jure is.

They do not care about these people so long as their message wins out.
Reply Quote
3
1 edit
Frisco
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:20p, 1/10/26
AG
Wonder why that video stops right when it does. The one that mikejones posted above
Reply Quote
3
lcraggie
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to pacecar02 • 1:25p, 1/10/26
AG
pacecar02 said:
It's what happened

how are facts mean?



Here is what I think is cruel.

The left is manipulating impressionable people into being chaos drones that they can deploy at the drop of the hat for whatever the cause de jure is.

They do not care about these so long as their message wins out.

It is in jest.

I attempted to play on the lefts point of view and failed to come across clearly in my distain for this woman. I apologize for the confusion.
Rangers Lead the Way, NSDQ


Reply Quote
4
1 edit
richardag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to pacecar02 • 1:34p, 1/10/26
pacecar02 said:
It's what happened

how are facts mean?



Here is what I think is cruel.

The left is manipulating impressionable people into being chaos drones that they can deploy at the drop of the hat for whatever the cause de jure is.

They do not care about these people so long as their message wins out.

By left manipulating people that includes the Governor of Minnesota, the mayor of Minneapolis, the MSM, the majority of the Democratic Party leadership. These are the people partially responsible for this woman's tragic death by their constant lies, evil speech inciting people like this woman to become deranged.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Reply Quote
4
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.