Minneapolis getting Hot?

257,123 Views | 3179 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by TyHolden
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EX TEXASEX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well, one of us has 90-plus years of public records showing that they are one of the most biased and corrupt organizations on the planet, that they have carried water for Stalin/Mao and every other enemy of the U.S., and that they have constantly manipulated the news presented to help the left and to destroy America from within. You keep defending this unbiased newspaper that just wants to inform the public so we can have a more informed electorate to make the country and democracy better.
#FJB
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Who?mikejones! said:



Bear spray nozzles mounted in the grills would help with this.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Kozmozag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another lgbtq nut, fafo. Democrats are respinsibke for this, they are like hamas need deaths of their useful idiots for political narrative.
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The only thing that really bothers me is why these officers weren't running body cams. This would be a lot simpler if they did.

Also, the officer that shot her seemed to be holding a cell phone moments before he drew his weapon. He had to put it down to pull. Why not body cams? Those are always leftist narrative killers once released.
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kozmozag said:

Another lgbtq nut, fafo. Democrats are respinsibke for this, they are like hamas need deaths of their useful idiots for political narrative.


The Left's cannon fodder. Eggs to be broken on the way to their utopian omelet.
solishu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Can that statement be true, and also statements that this ICE agent was actually not in imminent danger of his life?

Because I think that the two can coexist. And I think that idea that this ICE agent was actually about to be murdered by a vehicle moving 5 mph to be risible. But it's certainly possible that in a split second he wasn't able to accurately judge his level of threat.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BadMoonRisin said:

The only thing that really bothers me is why these officers weren't running body cams. This would be a lot simpler if they did.

Also, the officer that shot her seemed to be holding a cell phone moments before he drew his weapon. He had to put it down to pull. Why not body cams? Those are always leftist narrative killers once released.

Very few federal LEOs are required to wear body cams. Don't ask me why that is.
Anti-taxxer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BadMoonRisin said:

I got a poem.

Roses are Red
Violets are Blue
If you try and run over ICE
They gon' kill you.

Man.

I regret I have but one blue star for you.
Wildmen03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A Net Full of Jello said:

Rapier108 said:

KBTX pushing the big lie hard like the good commies they are.



Looks like Rusty pulled this post off Facebook. I bet the comments were GOLD.


That guy gets ratio'd on everything he posts. He's a sensationalist looking for clicks and constantly has bad takes.
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

BadMoonRisin said:

The only thing that really bothers me is why these officers weren't running body cams. This would be a lot simpler if they did.

Also, the officer that shot her seemed to be holding a cell phone moments before he drew his weapon. He had to put it down to pull. Why not body cams? Those are always leftist narrative killers once released.

Very few federal LEOs are required to wear body cams. Don't ask me why that is.


The whole idea of making the cops wear bodycams really didn't work out for the Libs like they thought it would.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BadMoonRisin said:

The only thing that really bothers me is why these officers weren't running body cams. This would be a lot simpler if they did.

Also, the officer that shot her seemed to be holding a cell phone moments before he drew his weapon. He had to put it down to pull. Why not body cams? Those are always leftist narrative killers once released.


I don't think they were in process of conducting an enforcement action but instead were in between. That was my understanding.

I also think the bodycam would actually not be helpful either way. People are willing to not believe their eyes that this lady put a vehicle in drive and accelerated in the direction of law enforcement.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
solishu said:

Can that statement be true, and also statements that this ICE agent was actually not in imminent danger of his life?

Because I think that the two can coexist. And I think that idea that this ICE agent was actually about to be murdered by a vehicle moving 5 mph to be risible. But it's certainly possible that in a split second he wasn't able to accurately judge his level of threat.

The vehicle was accelerating at him. If he gets twisted up he gets seriously injured or dead. Oh, and he knows this because it just happened to him a few months ago.

He absolutely accurately judged his threat.

Sorry, but the two cannot coexist. There is a singularity here that this lady deserved to have deadly forced used against her.
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
solishu said:

Can that statement be true, and also statements that this ICE agent was actually not in imminent danger of his life?

Because I think that the two can coexist. And I think that idea that this ICE agent was actually about to be murdered by a vehicle moving 5 mph to be risible. But it's certainly possible that in a split second he wasn't able to accurately judge his level of threat.
Go find a brick wall. Stand about 20 feet away. Then run full speed into it. You'll be going around 5mph when you hit it. Let us know how you make out.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

BadMoonRisin said:

The only thing that really bothers me is why these officers weren't running body cams. This would be a lot simpler if they did.

Also, the officer that shot her seemed to be holding a cell phone moments before he drew his weapon. He had to put it down to pull. Why not body cams? Those are always leftist narrative killers once released.

Very few federal LEOs are required to wear body cams. Don't ask me why that is.

Didn't the judge in Chicago order them to? Been so much of this I cannot specifically recall, but I thought they put a bunch of requirements on ICE there.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fasthorse05 said:

Quote:

Tim Walz's Dangerous Neo-Confederate Rhetoric

Decent summation of your post.

Tim Walz quote from the article
  • I've issued a warning order to prepare the Minnesota National Guard. We have soldiers in training who are prepared to be deployed if necessary."
I seem to remember a stolen valor issue with Tim Walz. He is pond scum and the National Guard should be aware he is a liar and has no honor.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Hubs and I were just spitballin' about using a fire apparatus to fine spray the protesters with water in sub-freezing temps there. He added putting a dye in the dry chem and spray them with that. Make them easy to track and find later. Turn 'em blue in two ways.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ICE needs MRAPS with snow plows
TRM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

KBTX pushing the big lie hard like the good commies they are.



Rusty

aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I seem to remember a stolen valor issue with Tim Walz. He is pond scum and the National Guard should be aware his is a liar and has no honor.

Oh, they know. They also know he ran away from his unit in the NG before they were be deployed to Afghanistan.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
samurai_science said:

Ag with kids said:

G Martin 87 said:

They surely know that Trump can just take over their NG. So one has to ask - what's their real goal? Are they figuring that there will be blowback on Trump if he does?

I think Trump could activate the active military. I believe that was one of the things SCOTUS said...Trump hadn't exhausted all his options yet so he couldn't activate the other state's NG...

He can take over the MN NG after its been activated by the gov of that state.

I was pointing out that he could actually use active duty military like Ike did.

Prior to the NG getting called up by the governor...
You can turn off signatures, btw
ttu_85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
techno-ag said:

KentK93 said:




Those poor guys. God bless them. They have to put up with that all day.

Yep anybody out there on the streets, at this point is looking for nothing but trouble. I sincerely hope they find what they are looking for x10.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
2008and1 said:

techno-ag said:

Here's how messed up they are. They celebrate Luigi, the NYC insurance exec murderer, but condemn this self defense shooting by a federal officer. What's down is up. What's good is bad. Bizarro World.


The fact that you see only a "they" here is the problem. Our president spewed all kinds of conjecture about this woman that there is no evidence of. This board is full of claiming all kinds of intentions to harm the ice agent. None of that appears true in the videos. Possible? Sure. Fact at this point. Absolutely not.


Now before you get all upset about that statement I think calling the ice agent a murderer at the start is also bull***** Do I think he used excessive force? Yes. Do I think what happened is outside the realm of possible outcomes when driving a vehicle that close to someone with a gun? No. Completely within the realm of possibility.


But all the conjecture about how vile the other sides person is is complete bull*****

There is video of that woman's SUV hitting the agent prior to him firing.

You should show yourself out now...
You can turn off signatures, btw
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
solishu said:

Can that statement be true, and also statements that this ICE agent was actually not in imminent danger of his life?

Because I think that the two can coexist. And I think that idea that this ICE agent was actually about to be murdered by a vehicle moving 5 mph to be risible. But it's certainly possible that in a split second he wasn't able to accurately judge his level of threat.


Not not in the moment.

The cop was standing right in front of the car, the engine revs as the lady hits the gas, the wheels spin due to the ice, which actually saves the agent.

The wheels spins and the car hits him, almost instantly. He judge correctly his life was in danger.

4stringAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

KBTX pushing the big lie hard like the good commies they are.




This video actually lends evidence to the strategy of her blocking and interfering with ICE officers and not just being some innocent bystander observing ICE.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2008and1 said:

EX TEXASEX said:

Quote:

This video literally just walks through what is clearly visible in the videos already published. Don't need to go all conspiracy theorist on the NYT bc of it.

A broken clock is right 2 times a day. If they mistakenly actually do real journalism, they are sure to corrected by being more bias on the next story. They are the wort scum and have been for 90 plus years. F them. They could donate a liver to save my life and I would still spit in their face if I could


Sounds like a healthy and unbiased view. I'm sure you get only the most honest and true news from the wide variety of sources you consume.

Of which NYT is neither true or honest, so its pointless.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
4stringAg said:

Rapier108 said:

KBTX pushing the big lie hard like the good commies they are.




This video actually lends evidence to the strategy of her blocking and interfering with ICE officers and not just being some innocent bystander observing ICE.

Who ya gonna believe? The New York Times or your own eyes?
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4stringAg said:

Rapier108 said:

KBTX pushing the big lie hard like the good commies they are.




This video actually lends evidence to the strategy of her blocking and interfering with ICE officers and not just being some innocent bystander observing ICE.

Its being going on since March of 2025, its well documented. People are just now finding out about this?
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Teachers are too busy to teach because they are at the protest
Tony Franklins Other Shoe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Never fear, Criminal Investigator Tarlov solved the case on The Five.

Citizen Good had pulled over to let ICE agents through. She even waved one of the vehicles through when the agent approached her car. She must have been confused because she backed up to pull out, then pulled away and the agent that shot her leaned around to shoot through the windshield. He then shot her twice through the driver's window.

As impeccable as this analysis is, I'm still wondering how he reached so far around with his gun hand (right hand) and was able to shoot through the windshield and then pop two shots through the driver side window. Surely he couldn't have transferred his gun to his left hand, reach around awkwardly and fire a shot without the gun slinging out of his hand at such a crazy angle, then .trick show-ed his gun to his right hand and finished the assault.

Person Not Capable of Pregnancy
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You posted a video earlier in this thread of a man who said he was a use of force expert (and also a Special Prosecutor in California iirc) and he said that they were mandated to have body cameras on. I'll have to go back and double check.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

The cop was standing right in front of the car, the engine revs as the lady hits the gas, the wheels spin due to the ice, which actually saves the agent.


Wheels were spinning while she was in reverse too. She did not back up as fast she intended due to the ice. Similarly, she did not go as fast as she expected when she shifted into drive. Any of us who have driven on ice or deeps snow know the sound of the engine revving and the tires spinning out. Auto transmission or manual, the sound is still the same. (I always would start in second on manual vehicles on ice or in deep snow. Keeps the torque down and gives the tires a little bit more traction. That may have just been my manual cars, Volvo Turbo and Accura Integra DOHC with a very high torque first gear.)
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This will not go well:

aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BadMoonRisin said:

You posted a video earlier in this thread of a man who said he was a use of force expert (and also a Special Prosecutor in California iirc) and he said that they were mandated to have body cameras on. I'll have to go back and double check.

I remember him saying that but I had some doubts about that at the time. Ordered by whom?

And I have also noted that with all of these ICE related stories in the past several months, we really haven't seen many BWC footage sequences that I noticed. Have you?
4stringAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
solishu said:

Can that statement be true, and also statements that this ICE agent was actually not in imminent danger of his life?

Because I think that the two can coexist. And I think that idea that this ICE agent was actually about to be murdered by a vehicle moving 5 mph to be risible. But it's certainly possible that in a split second he wasn't able to accurately judge his level of threat.


He also has a duty to protect other officers even if he felt his life wasn't in danger. One of whom was at the window of the vehicle reaching inside. Given this very officer had been dragged by a vehicle before its reasonable for him to decide in that moment both he and his fellow officer were in danger of being harmed by the driver using her car.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.