Minneapolis getting Hot?

232,523 Views | 2962 Replies | Last: 4 hrs ago by Pinochet
samurai_science
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Kenneth_2003 • 2:28p, 1/9/26
Kenneth_2003 said:
fatdad84ag said:
EFR said:
Honking and blowing whistles is absolutely NOT illegal even if "alerts the target". It is protected free speech. A good example is that the texas statute on interference clearly states it has to be more than speech to be interference.

Texas law (Transportation Code 547.501) makes it illegal to continuously or unnecessarily honk your horn; it should only be used as an audible warning for safety, to ensure safe operation, not for frustration, intimidation, or celebration, and must not be unreasonably loud or harsh. Excessive or malicious honking, especially when not for imminent danger, can lead to tickets for violating noise ordinances or for harassment.

When you tap-dance the day away on the cliff's edge you don't get to cry when the rocks ultimately give way.

This woman spent the entire day (from what I've heard, obviously no personal first hand knowledge) on the very legal edge of interfering with these officers/agents official and legal duties. We all know they were absolutely sick of her nonsense and had probably already and repeatedly shown more grace/mercy than she was deserved. So once they were well and fully sick of her nonsense she wasn't going to get any grace or reprieve, and with ample evidence from throughout the day (her own cell phone probably holds the evidence of her guilt here).

ANTIFA has been doing these operations since at least April, and for the past couple weeks in MN alone.
Reply Quote
3
Sims
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:28p, 1/9/26
AG
As a nation of laws, those who choose to interrupt, inhibit and interfere in the prosecution and and enforcement of those laws via intentional use of a deadly weapon should be considered innocent of all potential crimes and consequences of their outcomes...because laws.
Reply Quote
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jacketman03 • 2:29p, 1/9/26
jacketman03 said:
So, is following ICE agents around and honking your horn against the law? If so, I'd sure like to see those statutes.

**** anyone who does it.
Reply Quote
5
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rapier108 • 2:29p, 1/9/26
AG
Quote:
I'd want something more to back that up. 0hour1 isn't the most reputable source on Twitter. Like all clickbaiters, he'll post accurate stuff, but then a lot of BS as well.

Thanks. I don't do X so can't tell who is legit or not. But I do know she did not have custody of her two oldest children, ex-husband does. How that happened is unclear to me.
Reply Quote
2
Owlagdad
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to [removed post] • 2:32p, 1/9/26
94DCAg said:
I'm not here to convince anyone. You and those who have a very different perception would likely never get picked to be on a jury.

As a nation of laws, we should all demand a full assessment of the fact and ability for those harmed to see their day in court.

Sweeping immunity is a danger to us all. I hope you see that. If this was the Obama Administration and the driver was a White Supremist member, you'd expect a prudent investigation and court of law to weigh in.

So, you are saying that when Obama would have been President , members of this board would have agreed with a White supremist ramming into a peace officer?
Reply Quote
9
Who?mikejones!
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to [removed post] • 2:33p, 1/9/26
94DCAg said:
I'm not here to convince anyone. You and those who have a very different perception would likely never get picked to be on a jury.

As a nation of laws, we should all demand a full assessment of the fact and ability for those harmed to see their day in court.

Sweeping immunity is a danger to us all. I hope you see that. If this was the Obama Administration and the driver was a White Supremist member, you'd expect a prudent investigation and court of law to weigh in.


As a nation of laws, one might expect that the enforcement and execution of the federal immigration laws would be supported.

If not, one might expect the best protest is through voting leaders out or attending a peaceful rally.


Disagreement with laws alone does not justify actively interfering with the enforcement of them. Ask (former] judge Dugan how that goes
Reply Quote
9
1 edit
Teslag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to [removed post] • 2:34p, 1/9/26
AG
94DCAg said:
I'm not here to convince anyone. You and those who have a very different perception would likely never get picked to be on a jury.

As a nation of laws, we should all demand a full assessment of the fact and ability for those harmed to see their day in court.

Sweeping immunity is a danger to us all. I hope you see that. If this was the Obama Administration and the driver was a White Supremist member, you'd expect a prudent investigation and court of law to weigh in.


A nation of laws? What about immigration law? Those count?
Reply Quote
24
samurai_science
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Owlagdad • 2:35p, 1/9/26
Owlagdad said:
94DCAg said:
I'm not here to convince anyone. You and those who have a very different perception would likely never get picked to be on a jury.

As a nation of laws, we should all demand a full assessment of the fact and ability for those harmed to see their day in court.

Sweeping immunity is a danger to us all. I hope you see that. If this was the Obama Administration and the driver was a White Supremist member, you'd expect a prudent investigation and court of law to weigh in.

So, you are saying that when Obama would have been President , members of this board would have agreed with a White supremist ramming into a peace officer?

https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Hypothesis-Contrary-to-Fact


Offering a poorly supported claim about what might have happened in the past or future, if (the hypothetical part) circumstances or conditions were different. The fallacy also entails treating future hypothetical situations as if they are fact.

Reply Quote
1
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to [removed post] • 2:37p, 1/9/26
94DCAg said:
I view her as complying with the order to get out of there and CLEARLY trying to turn the car away from them.

That isn't how the law works, and she chose death.

She was a stupid, stupid woman. I hope her children are nothing like her.
Reply Quote
9
c-jags
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to [removed post] • 2:38p, 1/9/26
94DCAg said:
I view her as complying with the order to get out of there and CLEARLY trying to turn the car away from them.


You want to see what you want to see. That's why we have juries, voire dire, trials. I hope he sees a trial.

Reply Quote
26
EX TEXASEX
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:38p, 1/9/26
Looks like Hilton Hotels has checked out early from our favorite Indian owned ICE hating hotel.


?ve=1&tl=1

?ve=1&tl=1
#FJB
Reply Quote
12
1 edit
txags92
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to [removed post] • 2:39p, 1/9/26
AG
94DCAg said:
I view her as complying with the order to get out of there and CLEARLY trying to turn the car away from them.


You want to see what you want to see. That's why we have juries, voire dire, trials. I hope he sees a trial.


So you are ignoring the clearly audible order to stop the car and get out of the car that comes after that? Talk about seeing:hearing only what you want to see/hear…
Reply Quote
19
samurai_science
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ellis Wyatt • 2:39p, 1/9/26
Ellis Wyatt said:
94DCAg said:
I view her as complying with the order to get out of there and CLEARLY trying to turn the car away from them.

That isn't how the law works, and she chose death.

She was a stupid, stupid woman. I hope her children are nothing like her.

Also, he said get out of the car (4 times), not get out of here, and the poster you are quoting knows this. Either way it does not matter
Reply Quote
8
AgNav93
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Kozmozag • 2:41p, 1/9/26
AG
Kozmozag said:
Now watch as they protest and burn m/sp to the ground again.

It would be an improvement.
Reply Quote
2
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to [removed post] • 2:41p, 1/9/26
94DCAg said:
I'm not here to convince anyone. You and those who have a very different perception would likely never get picked to be on a jury.

As a nation of laws, we should all demand a full assessment of the fact and ability for those harmed to see their day in court.

The assessment happened. Then and there.

The obstructor is no longer entitled to a day in court. She chose very poorly.
Reply Quote
10
usmcbrooks
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Teslag • 2:45p, 1/9/26
Teslag said:
94DCAg said:
I'm not here to convince anyone. You and those who have a very different perception would likely never get picked to be on a jury.

As a nation of laws, we should all demand a full assessment of the fact and ability for those harmed to see their day in court.

Sweeping immunity is a danger to us all. I hope you see that. If this was the Obama Administration and the driver was a White Supremist member, you'd expect a prudent investigation and court of law to weigh in.


A nation of laws? What about immigration law? Those count?

Reply Quote
6
Muktheduck
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to samurai_science • 2:46p, 1/9/26
There's some deep irony in all of this in that these protesters fully expect that nobody will step on the accelerator when they're standing in front of a car
Reply Quote
12
1 edit
backintexas2013
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Muktheduck • 2:47p, 1/9/26
AG
Looking right at the target
Reply Quote
6
FireAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to [removed post] • 2:48p, 1/9/26
AG
94DCAg said:
I'm not here to convince anyone. You and those who have a very different perception would likely never get picked to be on a jury.

As a nation of laws, we should all demand a full assessment of the fact and ability for those harmed to see their day in court.

Sweeping immunity is a danger to us all. I hope you see that. If this was the Obama Administration and the driver was a White Supremist member, you'd expect a prudent investigation and court of law to weigh in.

WTF does who the President is have to do with this case?

I don't care if it's Obama, Bush, Clinton, JFK...whomever...

You drive with your foot on the gas toward an LEO who is within inches of your bumper, whether you meant to or not (forget the fact that she actually hit him), and you are at extremely high risk of taking gun fire (and dying from it) from that (or other) LEO...

I don't care if you're Mother Theresa or Ted Bundy...you cannot do what she did...period...
Reply Quote
18
1 edit
Who?mikejones!
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:48p, 1/9/26
Reply Quote
28
usmcbrooks
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FireAg • 2:52p, 1/9/26
FireAg said:
94DCAg said:
I'm not here to convince anyone. You and those who have a very different perception would likely never get picked to be on a jury.

As a nation of laws, we should all demand a full assessment of the fact and ability for those harmed to see their day in court.

Sweeping immunity is a danger to us all. I hope you see that. If this was the Obama Administration and the driver was a White Supremist member, you'd expect a prudent investigation and court of law to weigh in.

WTF does who the President is have to do with this case?

I don't care if it's Obama, Bush, Clinton, JFK...whomever...

You drive with your foot on the gas toward an LEO who is within inches of your bumper, whether you meant to or not (forget the fact that she actually hit him), you are at extremely high risk of taking gun fire from that (or other) LEO...

I don't care if you're Mother Theresa or Ted Bundy...you cannot do what she did...period...

Every single argument, this is said.
Reply Quote
3
TxAg82
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to [removed post] • 2:53p, 1/9/26
AG
94DCAg said:
I'm not here to convince anyone. You and those who have a very different perception would likely never get picked to be on a jury.

As a nation of laws, we should all demand a full assessment of the fact and ability for those harmed to see their day in court.

Sweeping immunity is a danger to us all. I hope you see that. If this was the Obama Administration and the driver was a White Supremist member, you'd expect a prudent investigation and court of law to weigh in.


I would fully expect anyone acting the way she did to be properly punished no matter their race or political leanings. Ideally that door would've been unlocked and she would've been pulled out and arrested, convicted, and punished for her actions instead of dying.
Reply Quote
4
backintexas2013
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TxAg82 • 2:55p, 1/9/26
AG
That's what should have happened instead she decided to drive at a LEO.
Reply Quote
6
richardag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jacketman03 • 2:55p, 1/9/26
jacketman03 said:
StandUpforAmerica said:
We need some sort of separate thread for

****** official stupid liberal white women ************



So, is following ICE agents around and honking your horn against the law? If so, I'd sure like to see those statutes.

Did you miss the officer saying "don't interfere". The officer didnt say don't follow us nor did he say don't honk your horn. The officer was calm and pleasant.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Reply Quote
2
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to usmcbrooks • 2:55p, 1/9/26
Quote:
Every single argument, this is said.

It's dehumanizing, and it is what they think of us, just normal Americans who believe in the rule of law for everyone.
Reply Quote
2
FireAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to usmcbrooks • 2:56p, 1/9/26
AG
Her argument is beyond asinine...

If a white farm boy drove his car toward a cop while trying to obstruct a BLM protest, and the farm boy ate lead...none of us would argue he didn't get exactly what he deserved...this isn't a political question...it's a question about the rule of law...

She ****ed up...she's at fault...and she paid for it with her life...end of story...
Reply Quote
16
richardag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jacketman03 • 2:56p, 1/9/26
jacketman03 said:
Who?mikejones! said:
Whats this entire "trying to flee" angle the leftist are currently pushing?

You dont have a right to flee arrest.

Okay, I'll play this game. What was the probable cause for the arrest that she was fleeing? Because absent probable cause, that's an illegal arrest.

They were blocking traffic and interfering with the officers.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Reply Quote
6
schmellba99
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to chase128 • 2:56p, 1/9/26
AG
chase128 said:
Rapier108 said:
jacketman03 said:
StandUpforAmerica said:
We need some sort of separate thread for

****** official stupid liberal white women ************



So, is following ICE agents around and honking your horn against the law? If so, I'd sure like to see those statutes.

Intentionally interfering with law enforcement who are engaged in their duties is a crime.


Honking and creating a distraction could be seen as interfering too

At the very least it is harassment under Minnesota Statute 609.749
Reply Quote
6
TAMUallen
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Who?mikejones! • 2:59p, 1/9/26
AG
Who?mikejones! said:


Reply Quote
8
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:00p, 1/9/26


Quote:
The video now released from the cell phone being used by the officer makes this even easier.

He's clearly gathering evidence by walking 360 around the car recording the face of the driver as well as her admissions for what they are doing, the face of admissions of her partner, and the license plate of the vehicle.

He only moves from the passenger side around the front of the vehicle -- where he had already been once -- when he sees another ICE office approaching the driver's door.

So this is his second time walking around the front -- and he maintains an amount of space between him and the vehicle -- with nothing having happened the first time, and the driver looking directly at him and engaging with him verbally.

She did not panic. She was PURPOSELY trying to evade contact with the second ICE officer approaching her door.

She was attempting to escape what she was anticipating to be an effort to arrest her.

Reply Quote
15
1 edit
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:01p, 1/9/26

Reply Quote
9
1 edit
FireAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 3:03p, 1/9/26
AG
will25u said:

Absolutely absurd and reckless...

But that seems to be the norm, these days...

They want a civil war...and they are getting closer and closer to getting one...
Reply Quote
17
captkirk
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Who?mikejones! • 3:03p, 1/9/26
AG
Who?mikejones! said:

Sweep the leg
Reply Quote
5
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 3:03p, 1/9/26
AG
Hate that sanctimonious asswipe.
Reply Quote
10
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:09p, 1/9/26
Reply Quote
1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.