Minneapolis getting Hot?

249,781 Views | 3102 Replies | Last: 22 min ago by will25u
usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
agsalaska said:

captkirk said:



Im trying to figure out the ammo. That gun is a .45/410 and thats some kind of boutique load but I do not recognize it. Thought it was an Underwood but it's not.

aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EFR said:

4 wounds doesn't mean 4 shots. The wound to her arm and one of the wounds to the chest were likely caused by the same round.

Left arm, right chest?
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Left hand on steering wheel, bullet passes through into chest?
schmellba99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Squadron7 said:

NE PA Ag said:

Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:




They should set up a couple of 50 caliber machine guns for when the time comes that they do have the numbers and bust through the fences. If an overwhelming crowd of people managed to get through and rush the buildings, running each of those through a few hundred rounds to cull their numbers would be a legitimate and appropriate response.

At $5/round?

Do you work for pentagon contractor or something?

Use .223 or something.

Just stand there with normal AR's. According to the media, one shot can mow down entire armies anyway.
usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BQ78 said:

And why do you only have 600 police officers, doofus?

I'm not running this cluster****, ask those who are.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Actually the head wound may also not have been direct as it says "protruding" which to me would indicate an entrance but no exit though it left some distortion in the head.

I think it's debatable if there were two or three shots, but doesn't seem possible for there to have been four shots.
Raiderjay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thank God idiot Crockett chimed in......

flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Think someone pointed out previously that she is actually right. The Dems are mad though cause the "slave patrol" are actually the "underground railroad" freeing these modern Dem slaves back to the home countries.
EFR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You appear to be assuming that she was sitting in her seat like she was taking a driving test. She was obviously agitated and moving, could have put her hands in some sort of upward/defensive position as she realized what was happening, twisted in her seat, that sort of thing. What I am saying is that it is not at all uncommon to see a bullet wound in the arm and a wound in the torso caused by the same projectile. A 9 mm fired from a couple of feet away is going to pass through your arm, and it has to go somewhere.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Who?mikejones! said:

Left hand on steering wheel, bullet passes through into chest?

I am trying to picture the trajectory, One shot through the windshield to the left side of the driver, car pulls up, two more shots through the open driver's window?
usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Raiderjay said:

Thank God idiot Crockett chimed in......



Jesus Christ. If brains were gasoline, she couldn't fuel a piss ants go-cart to do laps around a cheerio.
EFR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In the case of an EMS report it is very likely that they wrote "protruding" as a nice way of saying "her brain was hanging out of her head".
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yep, figure that too. Shots fired will likely be confirmed by the officers weapon.

Her autopsy is being done by whom?
BQ78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I was responding to the beta in the video not you.
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Raiderjay said:

Thank God idiot Crockett chimed in......




She possesses.....other ways of knowing.
1981 Monte Carlo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Raiderjay said:

Thank God idiot Crockett chimed in......



When it comes to Jasmine Crockett and anyone dumb enough to vote for her:

FobTies
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I wonder if the first windshield shot killed her? The initial shot(s) were totally justified, and if thats what killed her, he shouldnt be charged with anything.

However, if I was him, Id be concerned if the 3rd shot below is what killed her. Lots of ridiculous arguments from the left, but this would be their best chance.

I know many will defend this 3rd shot, just like they defended Chauvin holding his restraint after learning Floyd had no pulse. The woman was clearly in the wrong, as was Floyd. But its possible for cops to make mistakes....the problem is these incidents become a political war, red vs blue, and neither side wants to give an inch.

usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BQ78 said:

I was responding to the beta in the video not you.

I thought that was a bit unusual for you.
usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EFR said:

In the case of an EMS report it is very likely that they wrote "protruding" as a nice way of saying "her brain was hanging out of her head".

Or in the backseat.
TexasAggiesWin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Raiderjay said:

Thank God idiot Crockett chimed in......



Hey Crockett

usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasAggiesWin said:

Raiderjay said:

Thank God idiot Crockett chimed in......



Hey Crockett



Who gonna mow my grass? It be to damn hot out dare fo me.
TrumpsBarber
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EFR said:

In the case of an EMS report it is very likely that they wrote "protruding" as a nice way of saying "her brain was hanging out of her head"

In Texas, EMTs have to take jurisprudence courses with warnings about being respectful towards patients and so forth. That is probably worked around their DEI courses in Minnesota.
Gaeilge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fredfredunderscorefred
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Squadron7 said:

Raiderjay said:

Thank God idiot Crockett chimed in......




She possesses.....other ways of knowing.


Well they are the modern day slaves for democrats. Still the plantation party, and they don't like anybody messing with their slaves. Dems are ok encouraging horrific treks for people so they can have their cheap labor, but it's pretty gross.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gaeilge said:



1981 Monte Carlo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FobTies said:

I wonder if the first windshield shot killed her? The initial shot(s) were totally justified, and if thats what killed her, he shouldnt be charged with anything.

However, if I was him, Id be concerned if the 3rd shot below is what killed her. Lots of ridiculous arguments from the left, but this would be their best chance.

I know many will defend this 3rd shot, just like they defended Chauvin holding his restraint after learning Floyd had no pulse. The woman was clearly in the wrong, as was Floyd. But its possible for cops to make mistakes....the problem is these incidents become a political war, red vs blue, and neither side wants to give an inch.



For me it's not so much that I would defend that shot per se...it's that I personally acknowledge that cops are humans and during an adrenalinie dump real world scenario that goes from 0 to 120 mph in an instant, and it's all about fight or flight, I would extend a little bit of grace and benefit of the doubt to any human in that situation who may take one extra shot in an event like that.

I would not expect any living liberal to extend that slightest amount of grace or understanding though, so this guy may be f***ed, depending on the makeup of the jury. We are dealing with a bunch of braindead cretins who make arguments like "why not just shoot the gun out of the bad guy's hand?!" LOL. F'n tards.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:

Yep, figure that too. Shots fired will likely be confirmed by the officers weapon.

Her autopsy is being done by whom?

Hennepin County ME. Not sure it is the same guy as in the Chauvin case but he folded like a cheap lawn chair in that case.
JB!98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gaeilge said:





Today, unfortunately, many Americans have good reason to fear that they will be victimized if they are unable to protect themselves. And today, no less than in 1791, the Second Amendment guarantees their right to do so. - Justice Samuel Alito 2022
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oh no said:

Gaeilge said:





That's because there are not a lot of the amigos up there. Surprised they could even find a Mexican restaurant.
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gaeilge said:


Maybe the staff spit in their food.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
these illegal criminals that 77 million of us voted to have removed, many of them accused and convicted of heinous crimes, democrats and their Pravda media arm are successfully programming the masses that:

1. finding them and sending them home is the same thing as Gestapo rounding up the Jews in the late 1930s, and now,

2. finding them is the same thing as slave patrols in the confederate south.



damn I wish our degenerate society wasn't so mentally ill and easily brainwashed.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

oh no said:

Gaeilge said:





That's because there are not a lot of the amigos up there. Surprised they could even find a Mexican restaurant.

also, it's the Daily Beast, a pravda messaging tool designed to anger low IQ useful idiots, so it's probably not even true.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FobTies said:

I wonder if the first windshield shot killed her? The initial shot(s) were totally justified, and if thats what killed her, he shouldnt be charged with anything.

However, if I was him, Id be concerned if the 3rd shot below is what killed her. Lots of ridiculous arguments from the left, but this would be their best chance.

I know many will defend this 3rd shot, just like they defended Chauvin holding his restraint after learning Floyd had no pulse. The woman was clearly in the wrong, as was Floyd. But its possible for cops to make mistakes....the problem is these incidents become a political war, red vs blue, and neither side wants to give an inch.

I don't know why you think cops should only fire 1 shot, but you keep posting that over and over.

Police will fire until the threat is stopped. If one shot does it, great. If it takes 500, so be it. It also doesn't matter if the first shot is a kill shot, the last shot, or one in between.

The agent had a second to make a decision, and wasn't going to count his shots just to make you or anyone else feel better.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
FobTies
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1981 Monte Carlo said:

I would extend a little bit of grace and benefit of the doubt to any human in that situation who may take one extra shot in an event like that.


Yeah, thats where a jury comes in to determine if the "extra shot" fits the letter of the law.

I just try to be consistent. The Mesa PD cop went too far shooting Daniel Shaver claiming he was "reaching for a gun". You probably didnt extend grace with those shots. Many also didnt extend grace to Byrd for shooting Babbot.

So thats my point. The left being totally irrational and incapable of objective reason is irrelevant.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
eric76 said:

So when is Trump moving a carrier group to Lake Superior?

It's early in the day to generate this type of post.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.