FobTies said:
I wonder if the first windshield shot killed her? The initial shot(s) were totally justified, and if thats what killed her, he shouldnt be charged with anything.
However, if I was him, Id be concerned if the 3rd shot below is what killed her. Lots of ridiculous arguments from the left, but this would be their best chance.
I know many will defend this 3rd shot, just like they defended Chauvin holding his restraint after learning Floyd had no pulse. The woman was clearly in the wrong, as was Floyd. But its possible for cops to make mistakes....the problem is these incidents become a political war, red vs blue, and neither side wants to give an inch.
I don't know why you think cops should only fire 1 shot, but you keep posting that over and over.
Police will fire until the threat is stopped. If one shot does it, great. If it takes 500, so be it. It also doesn't matter if the first shot is a kill shot, the last shot, or one in between.
The agent had a second to make a decision, and wasn't going to count his shots just to make you or anyone else feel better.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill