Looks like we may have gotten involved in Venezuela

156,286 Views | 1760 Replies | Last: 7 hrs ago by JFABNRGR
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

GAC06 said:

aginlakeway said:

GAC06 said:

aginlakeway said:

GAC06 said:

I'm not even against it. I'm just not so indoctrinated into the Trump cult that I'll pretend he didn't just go to war.


So you support these actions? Great!


I think it could be a very good thing depending on how the aftermath works out. But it's still war.


So it is a war or an act of war?


And here we are. Attacking a country, bombing them and seizing their head of state is not a new war, it's merely an "act of war". But totally not war.

I won't disagree with you, but can you show one official source that called the seizure of Noriega a "war"?


23 killed invading a foreign country, and killing 300? Totally not a war. Just a thing we did.

I think Hitler may have had some more one sided conquest (but not wars)
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Panama was definitely a war.
jebeka
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I wouldn't be surprised if we don't hit multiple sites tonight.
Wabs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Was it considered a war when Obama killed people with drones (without Congressional approval)?
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wabs said:

Was it considered a war when Obama killed people with drones (without Congressional approval)?


Great question.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wabs said:

Was it considered a war when Obama killed people with drones (without Congressional approval)?


Yes, but I believe they claimed it was covered under existing war on terror resolutions
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiedata
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dr. Mephisto
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
KentK93 said:

Who?mikejones! said:

And here is the first, verified call for impeachment:



He's just a state senator


Umm, excuse me, but do you NOT know who he is???

He's a state senator! A STATE SENATOR!!!

Scott Weiner? WEINER!!!

He's responsible for HUNDREDS of people! HUNDREDS!

Are you daft, man?

I'm sure his team (his mother) "briefed" him this morning (after bringing him waffles and apple juice in bed), then he immediately called a meeting with his staff (also his mother), had his PR team (still his mother) craft this message carefully, had a press conference, who among the attendees was his mother, and is currently waiting on the president to call and seek his advice.

Show some RESPECT for the office, you absolute philistine!
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Who?mikejones! said:



Well this explains some of the ****posts on this thread
Demosthenes81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Over 72,000 US military have died in combat since the end of WW2. Not one of them died under a Congressional declaration of war. The largest number died under Democratic wars (Truman and JFK/Johnson.)

So spare me the bleating from the America Last brigade.
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
KentK93 said:

Who?mikejones! said:

And here is the first, verified call for impeachment:



He's just a state senator

Another commie paid for by the Chinese.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Who?mikejones! said:

And here is the first, verified call for impeachment:


Good thing we're a republic.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GAC06 said:

Wabs said:

Was it considered a war when Obama killed people with drones (without Congressional approval)?


Yes, but I believe they claimed it was covered under existing war on terror resolutions

“Some people bring joy wherever they go, and some people bring joy whenever they go.” ~ Mark Twain
DCPD158
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Teslag said:

In addition, assume this constitutes war (I'm open to that suggestion), what would constitute the end of said war? Or is it already over?

No declaration by either country
Company I-1, Ord-Ords '85 -12thFan and Websider-
Pichael Thompson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Was chapo's arrest also a war?

How bout diddy's?
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
KentK93 said:

Who?mikejones! said:

And here is the first, verified call for impeachment:



He's just a state senator


But he is running for Nancy Pelosi's soon to be open seat on the DC Stock Exchange.
Deputy Travis Junior
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wabs said:

Was it considered a war when Obama killed people with drones (without Congressional approval)?


So, the terrorists that he deep sixed were non state combatants. We do have legal frameworks for handling those.

I think it's obvious that bombing a country and flying off with its leader is akin to a declaration of war. HOWEVER, in this case almost everybody agreed that Maduro was an illegitimate ruler who starved and oppressed people who were begging for another leader. Plus, it's hard to claim that we started a war with Venezuela when the entire country is now celebrating our actions and lauding us as saviors. But, it's certainly pushing the boundaries of executive power outward, especially when Trump says we're going to help run the place temporarily. Specifically, Here's where it could really go sideways: If we deploy troops to provide security and Maduro's lieutenants device they want to fight to try to hold onto power, it's going to be hard to argue that this isn't a war or at least a large military action.

But for now, what the hell. This is good for Venezuela and good for us, so I'm going to cross my fingers and hope the worst case scenarios don't happen.
KentK93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dr. Mephisto said:

KentK93 said:

Who?mikejones! said:

And here is the first, verified call for impeachment:



He's just a state senator


Umm, excuse me, but do you NOT know who he is???

He's a state senator! A STATE SENATOR!!!

Scott Weiner? WEINER!!!

He's responsible for HUNDREDS of people! HUNDREDS!

Are you daft, man?

I'm sure his team (his mother) "briefed" him this morning (after bringing him waffles and apple juice in bed), then he immediately called a meeting with his staff (also his mother), had his PR team (still his mother) craft this message carefully, had a press conference, who among the attendees was his mother, and is currently waiting on the president to call and seek his advice.

Show some RESPECT for the office, you absolute philistine!

My bad….
Nuke_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HoustonAg2106 said:

Nuke_Ag05 said:

HoustonAg2106 said:

YouBet said:

HoustonAg2106 said:

Harry Stone said:

HoustonAg2106 said:

Zobel said:

who cares?

should the US oppose chinese expansion in the western hemisphere? or chinese expansion in critical industries and raw materials, to the point of monopolization? or their potential invasion of taiwan?

the world beyond our borders matters. our actions matter.

"hey one time some other people knocked over a statue" is about as facile a comparison as can possibly be made.


First of all if you are so concerned about the Chinese maybe stop them from invading our farm property and other industries in our own damn country. They have bought thousands of acres of land outside of militates throughout the US and we have done nothing about it.

And how are we supposed to be taken seriously about opposing Tawaiin being invaded by a foreign country when we are doing the same exact thing literally. If anything we just gave a green light to China to take Tawaiin off the board


Didnt realize Taiwan's leader was a narcoterrorist dictator who had sanctions against him. Apples to oranges my friend.


Apples and Oranges from our perspective, but China doesn't see it that way. It's entirely plausible to think they could take this as a sign of aggression and feel like their hand has now been forced to invade Taiwan just like Putin felt with Ukraine and the NATO situation.

China has already said they were going to invade Taiwan and by 2027 to be exact. So I see this as somewhat logical fallacy since you simply take them at face value and don't let what they've already said dictate what you should and shouldn't do to protect your own country in your own backyard.

Also, the entire western world has a strategic interest in Taiwan and we've already said we would defend them and so has Japan.

Hell, the UK Defense Minister told China they would nuke China if they did it.


Can you please share a link to China proclaiming their military strategies and even timelines to take Taiwan? I don't think they would share that information with the world but maybe I'm wrong.

Pretty open sourced during Biden administration. Around 2022 I think. PRC was pretty open about their 2035 plan to retake Taiwan. Then that become a 2030 and after our pullout of Afghanistan debacle it became a "we will be ready to take Taiwan by 2027." PLA set its military modernization goals at 2027 to coincide with the PLA centenary. They are also dropping new carriers in the water and setting up depots as well as making strong footholds in space. This all coincides with their goal and timeline to reunify. And all of this is on the google machine and has come straight from Xi and their foreign secretary.


Google is pulling reports from US intelligence that they believe China intends to take Taiwan by 227, but no official statements or claims directly from China claiming this.

My position though isn't that they will invade Taiwan solely because of our actions, but we are giving them the excuse they think they can use to attain what they ultimately want. Putin did the same thing blaming NATO presence in Poland as his reason for invading Ukraine but in reality he just want to do it but waited for the good reason to present itself

China believes Taiwan is theirs and it is theirs by right under the "One China" policy and they are setting things up and are pushing to be able to retake it by 2027. There are plenty of statements from Xi and multiple members of his cabinet including Li Shangfu and Qin Gang. There are numerous articles and papers on the subject as well and the US NDU as well as multiple US Congressional reports and strategy papers on the subject that are open source. Based on your posting history, you're playing the contrarian just to be contrarian.
Owlagdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiedata said:


.

Buenos Dias , Begoton!
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hey, or better yet, we could have President Potato Salad "calling the shots" from his electric potty chair with a VR headset of frogger to keep him pacified.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GAC06 said:

If someone seized Trump and took him outside the country would you think it's a war? You don't have to answer that.
Trump is our duly elected president. Maduro is not Venezuela's.
BlackLab
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
From a jack ryan episode years ago:

annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Never change CNN.

'"Some"

“Some people bring joy wherever they go, and some people bring joy whenever they go.” ~ Mark Twain
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You're really upset that Trump did something good, aren't you?
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:

You're really upset that Trump did something good, aren't you?

They really are. Their hatred for this man is so deep. They can never appreciate anything he does. Ever. It is just pathological TDS.
“Some people bring joy wherever they go, and some people bring joy whenever they go.” ~ Mark Twain
Anti-taxxer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GAC06 said:

If someone seized Trump and took him outside the country would you think it's a war? You don't have to answer that.

I know who would be fighting for Trump. Who's fighting for Maduro?
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GAC06 said:

If someone seized Trump and took him outside the country would you think it's a war? You don't have to answer that.


lol. We were told China would defend this guy. Well?

What are they going to do? Release another cold virus?
BlackLab
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Owlagdad said:

aggiedata said:


.

Buenos Dias , Begoton!
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This was absolutely an act of war. And it was a GOOD thing. The only reason people are fighting this obvious claim is Trump idiotically ran on the "no new wars" promise. That was a dumb promise for him to make. It's like promising "no new natural disasters".

And even if Maduro was duly elected, it wouldn't matter. He could have 100% of the vote, but by actively working to kill millions of Americans, he deserved to die. If he had more support among his people, then it's likely that more Venezuelan's would have had to die for us to achieve the goal of protecting America. The fact that almost nobody supported him made our job easier and saved many Venzuelan lives.

That being said, I'm against his trial. He should be a smoking hole in the ground. There is now a chance that he gets acquitted. We should have made sure that would have never been a possibility.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aTmAg said:

This was absolutely an act of war. And it was a GOOD thing. The only reason people are fighting this obvious claim is Trump idiotically ran on the "no new wars" promise. That was a dumb promise for him to make. It's like promising "no new natural disasters".

And even if Maduro was duly elected, it wouldn't matter. He could have 100% of the vote, but by actively working to kill millions of Americans, he deserved to die. If he had more support among his people, then it's likely that more Venezuelan's would have had to die for us to achieve the goal of protecting America. The fact that almost nobody supported him made our job easier and saved many Venzuelan lives.

That being said, I'm against his trial. He should be a smoking hole in the ground. There is now a chance that he gets acquitted. We should have made sure that would have never been a possibility.

Where did he say no new wars?

And this is hardly a war. There was a $50 million bounty on Maduro's head.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
agent-maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

That being said, I'm against his trial. He should be a smoking hole in the ground. There is now a chance that he gets acquitted. We should have made sure that would have never been a possibility.

Someone else posted that he has charges against him in Argentina so we could dump him there if he somehow got acquitted. Or just turn him back to the Venezuelan people and let them handle it Mussolini style.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The only chance he gets acquitted is if DOJ puts Lindsay Halligan in charge of the prosecution. That's not going to happen. Fortunately, DOJ in SDNY has attorneys in charge that know what the hell they're doing.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.