Libs know it. They are just upset that another hero is gone.
Hopefully this time is different. pic.twitter.com/s0tOV99hxk
— John Arnold (@johnarnold) January 3, 2026
Sq 17 said:unimboti nkum said:
Gas better be $1.50/gal after this or I'm going to be pissed
The only way gas goes to $1.50 is if this gambit triggers a global recession.
Gas prices go down because of weak demand not over supply of crude
HTH
Farmer_J said:
I guess this inevitably means that the US will be taking in millions of Venezuela refugees
unimboti nkum said:AtticusMatlock said:
He's going to be charged and put in Florence for narcotics trafficking. Wow.
Will he later be pardoned?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juan_Orlando_Hern%C3%A1ndez
twelve12twelve said:
"No new wars"
Forever war, comrades.
PaulsBunions said:
So is bombing another country not an act of war? It seems like the new definition of "war" is "whenever Congress says we're at war".
Hank the Grifter said:oldarmy76 said:
Cool, back to the war on drugs…just taken up a few notches
The War on Drugs as we know it was an abject failure we all recognize that. But the libertarian argument against it is every bit as moronic. The proliferation and use of drugs is in this country is a huge reason of why we are where we are.
They're an absolute cancer on civilization.
More like "give American companies their assets back."Mr.Milkshake said:
Gimme that oil
Ellis Wyatt said:More like "give American companies their assets back."Mr.Milkshake said:
Gimme that oil
ExPeterKeating said:Sq 17 said:unimboti nkum said:
Gas better be $1.50/gal after this or I'm going to be pissed
The only way gas goes to $1.50 is if this gambit triggers a global recession.
Gas prices go down because of weak demand not over supply of crude
HTH
I follow oil prices closely due to energy investments in OK and TX. Prices have stayed between $55-$60 for months. There was a brief uptick during this maneuver but prices are currently stable around $57.
Yukon Cornelius said:
Who are the three musketeers?
PaulsBunions said:
So is bombing another country not an act of war? It seems like the new definition of "war" is "whenever Congress says we're at war".
Waiting for liberals to put the Venezuelan flag in their bios
— Sir Doge of the Coin ⚔️ (@dogeofficialceo) January 3, 2026
Im Gipper said:PaulsBunions said:
So is bombing another country not an act of war? It seems like the new definition of "war" is "whenever Congress says we're at war".
Nice word game there.
People like Trump because he would not start any new wars. He has not started any new wars.
An act of war is not the same. You should know this.
Pylon Cam said:
The "no new wars" president strikes again
Quote:
I am simply asking a question.
TRUMP CALLED INTO FOX NEWS.
— Brent Scher (@BrentScher) January 3, 2026
B-1 83 said:Farmer_J said:
I guess this inevitably means that the US will be taking in millions of Venezuela refugees
Quite the opposite. Perhaps many will go home now that Maduro is gone.
BREAKING:
— Current Report (@Currentreport1) January 3, 2026
The home of Venezuela's defense minister was struck by US airstrikes.
Venezuelan media report that Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino LĂłpez is currently unreachable. pic.twitter.com/1v6bZTMDWI
MookieBlaylock said:Saxsoon said:
One of the positives I saw in Trump was the no new wars stuff.
Guess I was wrong
a military operation is not a war
good gravy
nu awlins ag said:Ellis Wyatt said:Mr.Milkshake said:
Gimme that oil
More like "give American companies their assets back."
Why do all liberals say the same lines over and over? Oil? Seriously? If it wasn't for the US energy and services companies, VZ wouldn't be able to produce a drop of it.
Who?mikejones! said:PaulsBunions said:
So is bombing another country not an act of war? It seems like the new definition of "war" is "whenever Congress says we're at war".
War is when two or more nations fight each other for some period of time. Or maybe a nation fights itself.
Its not a single military operation. If Venezuela decides to attack the US Navy now off its coast, perhaps a war could begin. For now, its just a military operation, similar to the thousands weve done before that did not lead to war.
Maduro is going to face trail, probably in front of a friendly judge, and will for sure use it as a microphone
45-70Ag said:BREAKING:
— Current Report (@Currentreport1) January 3, 2026
The home of Venezuela's defense minister was struck by US airstrikes.
Venezuelan media report that Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino LĂłpez is currently unreachable. pic.twitter.com/1v6bZTMDWI
BillYeoman said:B-1 83 said:Farmer_J said:
I guess this inevitably means that the US will be taking in millions of Venezuela refugees
Quite the opposite. Perhaps many will go home now that Maduro is gone.
You are right. And it isn't like Venezuelans were just hanging out in a Leftists Utopia under Chavez/Maduro. About 1/3 (9 million) left Venezuala. Largest exodus of a population ever without a war.
A lot will go back. Especially those in countries surrounding Venezuela
Pylon Cam said:
The "no new wars" president strikes again
PaulsBunions said:Who?mikejones! said:PaulsBunions said:
So is bombing another country not an act of war? It seems like the new definition of "war" is "whenever Congress says we're at war".
War is when two or more nations fight each other for some period of time. Or maybe a nation fights itself.
Its not a single military operation. If Venezuela decides to attack the US Navy now off its coast, perhaps a war could begin. For now, its just a military operation, similar to the thousands weve done before that did not lead to war.
Maduro is going to face trail, probably in front of a friendly judge, and will for sure use it as a microphone
So in this case its not a "war" because Venezuela did not fight back?