Clothes pins make the man 😂😂😂 pic.twitter.com/9ibi3QmY6H
— LynyrdsMom (@Lynyrds_Mom) January 9, 2025
Vanity thy name is ABC news...
Sorry Shakespeare.
Clothes pins make the man 😂😂😂 pic.twitter.com/9ibi3QmY6H
— LynyrdsMom (@Lynyrds_Mom) January 9, 2025
California lost a generation of qualified white men via openly discriminating against them.
— Cernovich (@Cernovich) January 9, 2025
Lost a bunch more during the Covid vaccine purges. A buddy of mine was a SEAL, he left the FD rather than take vaxx.
Turns out, you need these guys when disaster comes.
Yes and these pumps and hoses are on small bumper pulled trailers and are available at most equipment rental places. We use them for farm/ ranch irrigation regularly but they would also save buildings with the massive amount of water they pump. The common 8 inch pumps probably put out over 1,000 gallons per minute.HollywoodBQ said:And people keep asking me why I moved from someplace as great as Los Angeles to someplace as crappy as Galveston.Mas89 said:
I don't understand why they don't have/ use numerous diesel powered water pumps and use the ocean water.
Makes zero sense to me that all these very expensive beach front homes are burning up with " no water " available.
Looks aren't everything.
The city/county will want homes to be rebuilt as soon as possible. They can't tax the value of property at its max if a home is not on it. I have a feeling that they will loosen some of these regulations and codes to allow for rebuilding to begin.AlaskanAg99 said:HollywoodBQ said:
That was a solid rant by Adam Carolla.
One of the things he got on to with the Carsen Daly swimming pool story is how many of the houses in LA have been remodeled and have not had to meet modern building codes.
When they go to rebuild, everything will have to be up to modern codes which will make everything painful and more expensive.
My $1.1M mansion was insured for about $300,000 rebuild cost and the land was valued at $800,000.
It'll be interesting to see what folks were insured for versus what the rebuild cost is. Especially over the 3 year timeline that Carolla laid out, if they can even get a rebuild approved.
In case you missed it, this is a solid rant.Epic Adam Carolla rant from a hotel after the LA wildfires forced to evacuate from his home, where he predicts Hollywood leftists will be so frustrated by the rebuild effort that they will not vote Democrat:
— Eric Abbenante (@EricAbbenante) January 9, 2025
"You guys all voted for Karen Bass, the mayor of Los Angeles. You all… pic.twitter.com/YhNqBnJJR9
I can speak to this. This is an unintended consequence of Prop13 which changed how property taxes and re-assements are levied. I could write pages on how in the 70's people were being taxed out of their homes (to some degree the same is happening in TX now). So the result was to cap reassements to the purchase price and values could rise only a max of 2% annually tied to the CPI. The end result is homes are under taxed and starve the local and state government of funds which has led to an over taxation on businesses and has lead to CA experiencing boom and bust cycles.
To HBQ's point, a side effect is how improvements are taxed. Essentially any new add on SQ is taxed and capped at current market rate. But.... if you only remodel that sort of flies under the radar for permits. Which is why you'll see shanty looking homes next to mansions.
When you go to pull a permit if the total improvement value is >50% of the value of the structure that is referred to as a Substantial Improvement. Consequently if you're doing damage repairs and the total in damages is >50% of the value of the structure of the home it's considered Substantially Damaged. (This applies to flooding damage as well).
When this occurs the ENTIRE structure must be brought up to code and the cost can explode. This is why if you're flooded and in the 100yr flood plain and have been Sub Dammed you have to physically lift/elevate the home above the 100yr flood plain.
Now IF these homes have wildfire coverage they will receive the max the policy allows BUT it may not be calculated correctly for current rebuild costs, because the assessed value was never reported to either the assessors office or the carrier. This they are under insured. Unless the person said, i want to pay for higher coverage because they knew the policy couldnt cover the rebuild cost. But insurance is usually something people under pay for and roll the dice theyll never need it. Same for flood, if you do not have FEMA flood insurance you're SOL. But the feds do not provide separate wildfire coverage like they do for floods.
Insurance carriers in recent years have been canceling wildfire riders and theres a very high probability the majority of homes lost will have zero coverage even if covered by a homeowners policy. They'll be denied.
Before the last fire is extinguished, this will be a major news story since 99.9% of homes will be a total loss.
Edit: the above is for normal homes.
Those on the coast that have to deal with the Coastal Commission, they are truly ****ed. They will not be allowed to rebuild. They may own the lots, but the CC can deny permits. Wow, this is going to get so spicy.
That interview with the Mayor of LA was shocking.MarkTwain said:
Dice take
AtticusMatlock said:
Thousands of people, likely tens of thousands of people are now or will soon be homeless and have lost everything. Poaters on this site posting that they somehow deserved it is disgusting and it demonstrates the kind of people some of you are.
Dan Scott said:
It's the natural cycle of regulation. As your advancing and growing you tighten. Once area is established, you regulate to try to maintain.
Hey Internet - what’s happening in LA is not a “natural disaster” it’s eco-terrorism taking advantage of woke leaders and idiot DEI policies.
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) January 9, 2025
There are hundreds of reports of this.
If you care about the victims of the LA fires — look at the cause.
Please be high IQ right now. https://t.co/Fi7uXQEyOp
A side note on water in SoCal is that I can't believe they've never pursued desalination.Mas89 said:Yes and these pumps and hoses are on small bumper pulled trailers and are available at most equipment rental places. We use them for farm/ ranch irrigation regularly but they would also save buildings with the massive amount of water they pump. The common 8 inch pumps probably put out over 1,000 gallons per minute.HollywoodBQ said:And people keep asking me why I moved from someplace as great as Los Angeles to someplace as crappy as Galveston.Mas89 said:
I don't understand why they don't have/ use numerous diesel powered water pumps and use the ocean water.
Makes zero sense to me that all these very expensive beach front homes are burning up with " no water " available.
Looks aren't everything.
TexasAggiesWin said:
The utter incompetence and lack of accountability from any elected official in California and the greater LA area is absolutely ridiculous at this point.
It's not arson it was "campers", haven't you heard? "Campers" is the newest word being used to describe homeless vagrants that **** on the sidewalk.Nanomachines son said:Dan Scott said:
It's the natural cycle of regulation. As your advancing and growing you tighten. Once area is established, you regulate to try to maintain.Hey Internet - what’s happening in LA is not a “natural disaster” it’s eco-terrorism taking advantage of woke leaders and idiot DEI policies.
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) January 9, 2025
There are hundreds of reports of this.
If you care about the victims of the LA fires — look at the cause.
Please be high IQ right now. https://t.co/Fi7uXQEyOp
It's also obviously arson.
DEI: LA Department of Water and Power CEO Janisse Quinones makes $750,000 per year. Listen to her explain how LA ran out of water. One job… pic.twitter.com/PV8rVlE2Vo
— @amuse (@amuse) January 9, 2025
0% containment and this is a real article pic.twitter.com/pfMrZ75BCw
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) January 9, 2025
Quote:
In the 1950s the average timber harvest in California was around 6.0 billion board feet per year. Today, that number has dropped to ~1.5 billion board feet per year.
California's forests, which cover a third of the state, are now choked with nearly 163 million dead trees.
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and other regulatory policies limit the ability of local government and fire management services to clear dead trees and vegetation. (This is a big deal and prevents much of the controlled burns we desperately need.)
Multiple bills, including AB 2330, AB 1951, and AB 2639 were rejected by the democrat-controlled Legislature or vetoed by the Governor that would have exempted wildfire prevention projects from CEQA and other permitting issues.
Other legislation, including SB 1003, would have provided CEQA exemptions for utility undergrounding projects, as power lines that are not adequately cleared of debris present major wildfire risks. These bills also failed to reach the Governor's desk.
California has prioritized "suppression-only" strategies and failed to remove accumulated vegetation, leading to denser forests with increased fuel loads our forests have become tinderboxes, leading to devastating outcomes when a fire starts.
Bottom line: many of the wild fires CA experienced could have been prevented or significantly mitigated with better management, policies, and funding. This is a time for accountability and, more importantly, change in how we approach fire policy. Many of the rejected proposals were brought by Republicans, and I suspect they were rejected for that reason. There is only one political party to blame for CA's failures.
An actual photo of Gavin watching his 2028 presidential campaign going up in flames.Prosperdick said:
Houston Lee said:The city/county will want homes to be rebuilt as soon as possible. They can't tax the value of property at its max if a home is not on it. I have a feeling that they will loosen some of these regulations and codes to allow for rebuilding to begin.AlaskanAg99 said:HollywoodBQ said:
That was a solid rant by Adam Carolla.
One of the things he got on to with the Carsen Daly swimming pool story is how many of the houses in LA have been remodeled and have not had to meet modern building codes.
When they go to rebuild, everything will have to be up to modern codes which will make everything painful and more expensive.
My $1.1M mansion was insured for about $300,000 rebuild cost and the land was valued at $800,000.
It'll be interesting to see what folks were insured for versus what the rebuild cost is. Especially over the 3 year timeline that Carolla laid out, if they can even get a rebuild approved.
In case you missed it, this is a solid rant.Epic Adam Carolla rant from a hotel after the LA wildfires forced to evacuate from his home, where he predicts Hollywood leftists will be so frustrated by the rebuild effort that they will not vote Democrat:
— Eric Abbenante (@EricAbbenante) January 9, 2025
"You guys all voted for Karen Bass, the mayor of Los Angeles. You all… pic.twitter.com/YhNqBnJJR9
I can speak to this. This is an unintended consequence of Prop13 which changed how property taxes and re-assements are levied. I could write pages on how in the 70's people were being taxed out of their homes (to some degree the same is happening in TX now). So the result was to cap reassements to the purchase price and values could rise only a max of 2% annually tied to the CPI. The end result is homes are under taxed and starve the local and state government of funds which has led to an over taxation on businesses and has lead to CA experiencing boom and bust cycles.
To HBQ's point, a side effect is how improvements are taxed. Essentially any new add on SQ is taxed and capped at current market rate. But.... if you only remodel that sort of flies under the radar for permits. Which is why you'll see shanty looking homes next to mansions.
When you go to pull a permit if the total improvement value is >50% of the value of the structure that is referred to as a Substantial Improvement. Consequently if you're doing damage repairs and the total in damages is >50% of the value of the structure of the home it's considered Substantially Damaged. (This applies to flooding damage as well).
When this occurs the ENTIRE structure must be brought up to code and the cost can explode. This is why if you're flooded and in the 100yr flood plain and have been Sub Dammed you have to physically lift/elevate the home above the 100yr flood plain.
Now IF these homes have wildfire coverage they will receive the max the policy allows BUT it may not be calculated correctly for current rebuild costs, because the assessed value was never reported to either the assessors office or the carrier. This they are under insured. Unless the person said, i want to pay for higher coverage because they knew the policy couldnt cover the rebuild cost. But insurance is usually something people under pay for and roll the dice theyll never need it. Same for flood, if you do not have FEMA flood insurance you're SOL. But the feds do not provide separate wildfire coverage like they do for floods.
Insurance carriers in recent years have been canceling wildfire riders and theres a very high probability the majority of homes lost will have zero coverage even if covered by a homeowners policy. They'll be denied.
Before the last fire is extinguished, this will be a major news story since 99.9% of homes will be a total loss.
Edit: the above is for normal homes.
Those on the coast that have to deal with the Coastal Commission, they are truly ****ed. They will not be allowed to rebuild. They may own the lots, but the CC can deny permits. Wow, this is going to get so spicy.
They passed a $7B bond to pay for water storage to prevent runoff into the ocean several years ago and have built exactly nothing. Criminal levels of negligence IMO.fixer said:
They are running out of water for this?
Wow.
With criminal levels of taxation, they don't have the facilities for this?
Newsome's trips to French Laundrie could have paid for an engineering assessment of their system.
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass makes blunder during wildfire press conference.
— Oli London (@OliLondonTV) January 9, 2025
“All of this can be found at URL.”
pic.twitter.com/2htQaCynQ5
Yep. Lenin's old "who, whom" in practice.Who?mikejones! said:
Its not about whether the tanks are full and the firefighters are competent....
Its about who fills the tanks and who wears the uniform
Quote:
LA Department of Water and Power CEO Janisse Quinone
- enjoys a $750,000 a year salary
- strong proponent of DEI and Women's rights
- focused on using recycled water using a $428 Million grant of Federal Funds.
- expanded our "carbon free power supply" with a "64 percent clean energy" profile.
- supported the poor through the " Powered by Equity initiative", "Customer Support Saturdays" and "Cool LA Heat Relief for Seniors events"
BREAKING: JANISSE QUINONES is the New Head of L.A. Department of WATER and Power.
— Ann Vandersteel™️ (@annvandersteel) January 9, 2025
She was recommended to the position by Mayor Karen Bass back in May 2024.
She makes $750,000 a year — nearly TWICE as much as her MALE predecessor.
And almost ONE year later, LA is OUT OF WATER… pic.twitter.com/bGYTgUu1xE
Remember W's infamous 'You're doing a heckuva job, Brownie!' In Louisiana?Quote:
The project features treating wastewater from the existing water reclamation plant in the Van Nuys neighborhood of Los Angeles using microfiltration, reverse osmosis and ultraviolet and advanced oxidation.
The facility will also feature electrical, maintenance and warehouse facilities to help produce and convey the purified water from Tillman 10 miles northeast to L.A. County's Hansen Spreading Grounds. There the purified water will recharge the San Fernando Groundwater Basin and provide a new drought-resistant source of drinking water as it fills the groundwater aquifer. The water will then get delivered through taps into homes after additional testing and treatment.
The city has used recycled water for over 40 years. The new plant will be the third for the city and the largest, bigger than the 12 million gallons per day at the Terminal Island Water Reclamation Plant and the 1.5 million gallons per day at the Hyperion Water Reclamation Plant. This is the first facility in Los Angeles to use recycled water for in-home taps as drinking water.
Nanomachines son said:Dan Scott said:
It's the natural cycle of regulation. As your advancing and growing you tighten. Once area is established, you regulate to try to maintain.Hey Internet - what’s happening in LA is not a “natural disaster” it’s eco-terrorism taking advantage of woke leaders and idiot DEI policies.
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) January 9, 2025
There are hundreds of reports of this.
If you care about the victims of the LA fires — look at the cause.
Please be high IQ right now. https://t.co/Fi7uXQEyOp
It's also obviously arson.
Wait until you hear about their high-speed rail project!powerbelly said:They passed a $7B bond to pay for water storage to prevent runoff into the ocean several years ago and have built exactly nothing. Criminal levels of negligence IMO.fixer said:
They are running out of water for this?
Wow.
With criminal levels of taxation, they don't have the facilities for this?
Newsome's trips to French Laundrie could have paid for an engineering assessment of their system.
Don't get me started on the waste of high speed rail in the US.aezmvp said:Wait until you hear about their high-speed rail project!powerbelly said:They passed a $7B bond to pay for water storage to prevent runoff into the ocean several years ago and have built exactly nothing. Criminal levels of negligence IMO.fixer said:
They are running out of water for this?
Wow.
With criminal levels of taxation, they don't have the facilities for this?
Newsome's trips to French Laundrie could have paid for an engineering assessment of their system.
This is the leadership team at the Los Angeles Fire Department. pic.twitter.com/x8c0tH5MKC
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) January 8, 2025
I used to double hat as a pseudo PM just to assist my actual PM when I was contracting there just to keep even with the atrocious amounts of regulations and paperwork we had to keep abreast of.Bird Poo said:
The water they do have is not safe to drink. They just issued a boil water notice.
What's insane to me, having to deal with LA County and City fire departments in a previous career, is that every business has to have a permit and submit thousands of dollars, with annual reports, to the local governements for simply storing a barrel of oil or a barrel of anything flammable/combustible. The FDs generate hundreds of millions from these "Hazardous Materials Business Plans" that businesses have to submit by law. They send inspectors out to take a look at your barrel. You have to draw maps of your entire facilitiy locating all utilities and storage areas. You have to have a "contingnecy plan" that outlines where the nearest emergency facility is located and their contact information. All of your employees have to be trained on hazardous material storage, annually, to simply store a barrel of oil, paint, or even propane.
I have no doubt that CA will double down on these idiotic regulations in an effort to prove that these agencies have a purpose.
And yet, here we are.
I don't get this. Am I supposed to believe that someone who has 22 years on the job and rose through the ranks starting as a Firefighter, then Paramedic, Engineer, Fire Inspector, Captain I, Captain II, Battalion Chief, Assistant Chief, Deputy Chief, Chief Deputy, and now Fire Chief is not qualified for the job because they're gay?Raiderjay said:This is the leadership team at the Los Angeles Fire Department. pic.twitter.com/x8c0tH5MKC
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) January 8, 2025