***Iran [Military Action Thread]***[See Staff Note in OP]

627,383 Views | 3329 Replies | Last: 29 min ago by jwhaby
CaptnCarl
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah the ideology is the real war. I guess we may never eliminate the ideology, but we can eliminate their access to traditional and nuclear warfare.
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BBRex said:

Ag with kids said:

KentK93 said:

GAC06 said:

Iran has apparently had some success targeting our most sophisticated radars in the region. Not a great look to let a $30,000 drone take out a basically irreplaceable (in the near term) $300,000,000 system.

https://www.twz.com/news-features/iranian-attacks-on-critical-missile-defense-radars-are-a-wake-up-call

Saturation will happen on systems if there are more targets than the system can handle. It will be interesting to see how the USA in the future protects these RADARs. Need more layers and more capacity to track targets and target management.

My guess is, in the future, they'll deploy the LPWS (Land Phalanx Weapon System) to protect assets like that.

It's basically the Phalanx CWIS system that the Navy uses...


I mentioned this before, but that system used heavy ammunition that has to fall somewhere. I don't think you're going to want those in populated areas.


They use explosive rounds that detonate before falling
KentK93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

KentK93 said:

GAC06 said:

Iran has apparently had some success targeting our most sophisticated radars in the region. Not a great look to let a $30,000 drone take out a basically irreplaceable (in the near term) $300,000,000 system.

https://www.twz.com/news-features/iranian-attacks-on-critical-missile-defense-radars-are-a-wake-up-call

Saturation will happen on systems if there are more targets than the system can handle. It will be interesting to see how the USA in the future protects these RADARs. Need more layers and more capacity to track targets and target management.

My guess is, in the future, they'll deploy the LPWS (Land Phalanx Weapon System) to protect assets like that.

It's basically the Phalanx CWIS system that the Navy uses...

Agree but I think a Cargo Net built around it might be a great last defense. It would have to be engineered such not to impact the radar ability.
Dan Scott
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Guess it's official. We had the Pahlavi dynasty, now it's the Khamenei dynasty.
Gaeilge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'll put the O/U at 72hrs.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Somewhere in Israel, a GBU is having "For Seyed" written on it.
bmks270
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
KentK93 said:

Ag with kids said:

KentK93 said:

GAC06 said:

Iran has apparently had some success targeting our most sophisticated radars in the region. Not a great look to let a $30,000 drone take out a basically irreplaceable (in the near term) $300,000,000 system.

https://www.twz.com/news-features/iranian-attacks-on-critical-missile-defense-radars-are-a-wake-up-call

Saturation will happen on systems if there are more targets than the system can handle. It will be interesting to see how the USA in the future protects these RADARs. Need more layers and more capacity to track targets and target management.

My guess is, in the future, they'll deploy the LPWS (Land Phalanx Weapon System) to protect assets like that.

It's basically the Phalanx CWIS system that the Navy uses...

Agree but I think a Cargo Net built around it might be a great last defense. It would have to be engineered such not to impact the radar ability.


Massive jet engine exhaust to just blow them off target.
Dan Scott
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Part of me is thinking we allowed this. We could declare the war over and Trump call it a win and Iran call it a win. Nuclear and military is practically destroyed a win for the US and Islamic republic still alive is a win for Iran. And Iranians are going to be too busy rebuilding to care about anything outside their borders.
Gaeilge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can't leave until the IRGC capitulates and exiles or is dead. If we don't free the Persians, this will be viewed as an abject failure. Trump, as well as anyone that supported him, will be dragged. Bloodbath midterms for the GOP.

Also, we aren't leaving without the Uranium. Every freaking gram of it.

I am a hardline conservative and that's how I feel as well.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We could have Trump step off the plane and declare "Peace in Our Time!"

You are dangerously naive. Unconditional surrender is the proper end point from Iran's side.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Uhmm? NY Post reported this a few days ago.

Quote:

That's one rocket he won't be launching.
The son of Iran's slain Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, who is reportedly the favorite to succeed his despotic father in power was treated for "impotency" so severe that he had to be hospitalized numerous times, diplomatic leaks show.

Mojtaba Khamenei, 56, underwent several stints of treatment at the Wellington and Cromwell Hospitals in London after having a hard time conceiving with his wife, US diplomatic cables published by WikiLeaks in the late 2000s showed.
The regime hardliner was reportedly so soft that he checked into the clinics at least four times including a stay that lasted two months before he was finally able to knock up his wife.

Quote:

That ordeal also came after Mojtaba went through two "temporary marriages" allowed under Islamic law so men and women can have non-committal sex in good religious standing so he could get some practice in the sack.
"His marriage, to the daughter of former Majles Speaker Hadad Adel, followed two 'temporary marriages' and occurred relatively late in life, reportedly due to an impotency problem treated and eventually resolved during three extended visits to the UK," the cable continued, though it remains unclear how many children he ended up siring.

LINK
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Iranian citizens are unimpressed by this choice.
Dan Scott
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gaeilge said:

Can't leave until the IRGC capitulates and exiles or is dead. If we don't free the Persians, this will be viewed as an abject failure. Trump, as well as anyone that supported him, will be dragged. Bloodbath midterms for the GOP.

Also, we aren't leaving without the Uranium. Every freaking gram of it.

I am a hardline conservative and that's how I feel as well.


I could be giving way too much credit to Iranians.

Khameneis behavior was wierd the last few weeks like he knew the end was coming was coming soon and was getting ready for it. The day he died he wasn't hiding, he was home at home. If we wanted the IRGC we'd have taken the the father and son. We had to have known the son was next in line. I thought it was weird how we killed the wife of the son but not the son. So these guys that are heavy on martyrdom maybe sacrificed themselves to get the son in secure spot to lead.

Unless they agree to export the uranium and inspections, you got to go in.

Crude oil up 15% as I type this. Its risky to continue when there is a nice off ramp
The Fall Guy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
US orders diplomats out of Saudi Arabia

https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/us-said-to-order-diplomats-in-saudi-arabia-to-exit-the-country-nyt/
Dan Scott
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dan Scott
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Fall Guy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bahrain hit again.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/bahrain-says-civilians-injured-buildings-damaged-in-iranian-drone-attack/
knj2417
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Should smoke that whole square and eliminate a pile of hardline extremists
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
KentK93 said:

Ag with kids said:

KentK93 said:

GAC06 said:

Iran has apparently had some success targeting our most sophisticated radars in the region. Not a great look to let a $30,000 drone take out a basically irreplaceable (in the near term) $300,000,000 system.

https://www.twz.com/news-features/iranian-attacks-on-critical-missile-defense-radars-are-a-wake-up-call

Saturation will happen on systems if there are more targets than the system can handle. It will be interesting to see how the USA in the future protects these RADARs. Need more layers and more capacity to track targets and target management.

My guess is, in the future, they'll deploy the LPWS (Land Phalanx Weapon System) to protect assets like that.

It's basically the Phalanx CWIS system that the Navy uses...

Agree but I think a Cargo Net built around it might be a great last defense. It would have to be engineered such not to impact the radar ability.


I've wondered why we don't see computer vision targeting systems for the stuff that is too small for radar or too low and slow.
Psych
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
knj2417 said:

Should smoke that whole square and eliminate a pile of hardline extremists


Those are most likely regular citizens forced to take to the streets "in support" of the government.
Science Denier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gaeilge said:

I'll put the O/U at 72hrs.



I'll take the under.
hsjnlssmith89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dan Scott said:

Part of me is thinking we allowed this. We could declare the war over and Trump call it a win and Iran call it a win. Nuclear and military is practically destroyed a win for the US and Islamic republic still alive is a win for Iran. And Iranians are going to be too busy rebuilding to care about anything outside their borders.


Islamic Republic still alive!!! How the F is that a win?!!! WTF are you smoking?
FCBlitz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am surprise the isn't more reporting how those storage facilities that are torches flaming away are causing really major concerns in China….not only is oil prices rising but there crack dealer and his supply just got destroyed.

Pretty soon China will be acting like Jack Blacks character on "Tropic Thunder" during his cocaine withdrawal.
The Fall Guy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
All of Iran's Allies in Iraq and Houthis say new Leader is welcome and calls it a victory
The Fall Guy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FCBlitz said:

I am surprise the isn't more reporting how those storage facilities that are torches flaming away are causing really major concerns in China….not only is oil prices rising but there crack dealer and his supply just got destroyed.

Pretty soon China will be acting like Jack Blacks character on "Tropic Thunder" during his cocaine withdrawal.


The oil refinery in Tehran was not Chinas oil. The Island is and Trump said he is not going to hit the refinery. In fact Iran said tankers are still going thru.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I swear I've seen on this very thread multiple times that son was killed days ago.
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I thought Khomenis kid was already killed. Guess not
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

I swear I've seen on this very thread multiple times that son was killed days ago.

I thought the same thing.
Psycho Bunny
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Translation

The Iranians are already demanding the head of the new Ayatollah in Tehran, shouts of "Death to Mojtaba!" can be heard.

Can't decide if I want to be cute and cuddly, or go blow some sh*t up.
Decisions decisions
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mathguy64 said:

YouBet said:

I swear I've seen on this very thread multiple times that son was killed days ago.

I thought the same thing.


There were reports that he didn't want the gig and the mullahs forced it upon him and then we had reports that he had been killed within just a few hours of being named.

Guess that was all crap.
Cowbird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thought that was his eldest son.
Fightin_Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Iranian citizens are unimpressed by this choice.



I don't believe this is anything more than AI slop

Not that a lot of Iranians don't want him dead and gone

I just don't see how you can hear a person shouting and clearly make it out coming from different directions in a loud noisy city with lots of buildings to block sound
FCBlitz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Fall Guy said:

FCBlitz said:

I am surprise the isn't more reporting how those storage facilities that are torches flaming away are causing really major concerns in China….not only is oil prices rising but there crack dealer and his supply just got destroyed.

Pretty soon China will be acting like Jack Blacks character on "Tropic Thunder" during his cocaine withdrawal.


The oil refinery in Tehran was not Chinas oil. The Island is and Trump said he is not going to hit the refinery. In fact Iran said tankers are still going thru.


There were storage facilities hit. I can guarantee no more sweet price per bbl will occur. Between Iran/Venezuela/ Russia …..China will take severe swift kick in the sack that one year ago…they never saw coming.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What?
Dan Scott
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lindsey Graham kinda confirms report that US was not happy about Israel hitting the oil infrastructure.



 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.